Oh, I do. Thank you. Thank you. ¶¶ ¶¶ ¶¶ Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. and seconded for the approval of the minutes from October 9th, 2014. Please vote when it comes up on the screen. Motion passes. Thank you. Any postponements or withdrawals from today's agenda? Mr. Cayley. Mr. Chairman, members of the board, on page 2, Plan B, Plan 2014-93F Harvey property, request a one-month postponement to the December 11th meeting. Anyone in the audience wish to speak to this request for postponement? Commission members, seeing none, I'll entertain a motion. Mr. Chairman. Yes, ma'am. Move the postponement of Plan 2014-93F Harvey property to December 11th. Second. Motion's been made and seconded for postponement of the Harvey property until December 11th, 2014. Please vote when it comes up on the screen. That motion passes. Thank you, sir. Other requests for postponements or withdrawals? Yes. Ms. Mundy? I'd like to propose a motion to continue ZODA 2014-4 Recreation and Tourism Land Uses to January 29th of 2015. Thank you. Motion's been made and seconded for the continuance of the Zoda Recreational Text Amendment until January the 29th, did you say? 29th, 2015. Motion was seconded. Please vote when it comes up on the screen. That motion passes also. Any other requests for postponements or withdrawals? If not, I'll ask Mr. Salee to walk us through the consent agenda. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Try this again. Okay. Sorry, I was worried about feedback. We were inquiring about the affidavits that are shown on your consent agenda and there is an issue with one of them. There are several items though that do appear on your consent agenda With the first item being postponed, the first item eligible is a final subdivision plan recommended for conditional approval by your subdivision committee. It appears on page 2, item D of your meeting agenda. Plan 2014-95F, an amended final plat for Ellerslie Place, also known as Midland Crossing. This involves property with an address of 222 Midland Avenue and 225 Walton Avenue. There are a number of development plans recommended for conditional approval by your subdivision committee, which also appear in your consent agenda. The very first one, Mr. Chairman, we understand the affidavit has not been submitted. We would recommend that you pull that in the hopes that we could discuss that and give the applicant time to bring the affidavit for that item. That would leave then the first item eligible being on page 3, item B of your meeting agenda. DP 2014-87, a final development plan for the Miller-Bird Commercial Park Unit 2. This involves property with an address of 2532 Regency Road. You will note on the consent agenda that the commission is required to make specific findings for the approval of this plan, and those have been provided to you by the staff on a white sheet along with a letter submitted by the applicant with this plan name. The next item on the consent agenda is on page 4, item D of your meeting agenda, DP 2014-89, Hamburg East Lot 2. This involves property with an address of 2500 Polo Club Boulevard. This item, like the last, requires the commission to make findings, and the staff has prepared for you an EAMP compliance report for this plan. In addition, the staff has received the affidavit for the signposting, and that sign does advertise today's meeting date and time. We'll submit that for the record. There are three additional development plans on your consent agenda. Page 5, item G, is DP 2014-98, an amended final development plan for Griffongate Farm. This involves property with an address of 1800 Newtown Pike. The next item on your meeting agenda is also on the consent agenda. Page 5, item H, DP 2014-99, Coventry, Lot 5, also known as Belmont Farm. This is for property located on Remington Way. The final item on your consent agenda is the final development plan on your meeting agenda. Page 5, item I, DP 2014-100, Brighton Place Shops, Lot 2. This is an amended final development plan for property with an address of 3090 Helmsdale Place. Mr. Chairman, at this time, unless a member of the Commission, a member of the audience today, an applicant, or anyone else would wish to remove one of these items to allow further discussion, there are a total of six items eligible for approval at this time as part of your consent agenda approval. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Sally. Anyone in the audience wish to pull and hear any one of the remaining items left on the consent agenda? Any Commission member? If not, I'll entertain a motion for the consent agenda as presented with the exception of the Harvey property and then Morningside property being pulled from the consent agenda. Mr. Chairman, I move to approve the consent agenda with the postponement of the Harvey plan and the Morningside market plan. That would be just pulling, not postponement. Second. Motion has been made and seconded for the amended consent agenda as read, pulling Harvey property and Morningside property. Please vote when he comes up on the screen. Motion passes. Thank you. We'll move on to our first item on the agenda. It's at the bottom of page one under final subdivision plans. is Plan 2014-70F, Sam's property and Larkin property. You do have a revision before you, which is on a blue sheet, and also a waiver that's on a white sheet. Mr. Martin. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, members of the Planning Commission. First item is on page one of your agenda. Plan 2014-70F, Sam's property and Larkin property, also known as Kentucky Eagle Lot 1. This is a final plan for property located on Spur Road, Innovation Drive in this location, and Greendale Road. You've got the Norfolk Southern Railroad boarding the property in this location. They are proposing to subdivide Lot 1 in this location, 2.7 acres, and create Lot 2 in this location. Now, Lot 1 currently has a recording studio on it. There's no development on the Sam's property at present. This is Eagle Creek Beer Distributing. It's located here on Innovation Drive. There's a development plan that governs this property from 2008. There's a development plan that governs this property from 2008. Originally, as proposed, they were going to have three lots. Lot one, they were going to have a reconfiguration of lot two, and they were going to maintain a lot in this location. There was considerable concern expressed about the public infrastructure in this location, specifically sanitary sewer being a very large concern in this area and the requirement that they provide public sewer to these properties in conformance with your land subdivision regulations. the revised plan now addresses that situation now it by combining lot two with the two development plan areas the eagle beer distributor has a pump station that does provide the sewer service to that facility. In 2003, when this property was initially developed on this development plan, it was restricted to the recording studio only unless sewer was provided. At that time, they were provided with a septic tank, which is contained in its entirety, the tank and the drain field, on this proposed lot one. In order to put sewer these properties and the challenge that exists is why they have a pump station. There's a force main over here across Spur Road. And again, Spur Road and the difficulty, it would require a tremendous amount of work and expense to provide another pump station or an extremely long gravity line and a lot of work to actually serve this property. Now, this was recognized in 2003, and it's been carried forward in a recommendation that you have before you today that this be limited to no development until such time as public sewer is available. There's also a condition, it's been a long-standing condition, that lot one be hooked up to public sewer once it is available. And it will become available with the development of this property. And we don't know when that's going to be, neither does the applicant. That is the circumstances that concern the waiver request today because your subdivision regulations require that a septic system can be approved on a 10-acre or larger tract. Obviously, with this proposal, tract lot one will be 2.7 acres, and of course that's less than 10 acres. However, the septic system is on that lot, as I stated, in its entirety. According to information we've received, it functions just fine. One of the conditions of the waiver approval as well as the plan approval that we have in front of you today is verification of that by the Board of Health prior to plan certification. We would like to have that verified before we do certify this plan. So your staff is recommending approval of this modified and amended plan that you see before you, and we are recommending approval of the waiver as well. And if you have any questions for me, I'll be happy to try to answer them. Questions for Mr. Martin? Tom, let me see if I can clarify something. You said that the corner lot, that they're subdividing connection to the sewer would wait until the other piece of property is developed? Yes, that would be the most likely scenario. Now, there may be some other scenario over time that would develop that would make public sewer available to this lot, but it is currently not available without the construction. So if they develop the other track, the fronts on Greendale, if they develop it, they will have to provide service to the corner? Yes. They will have to have. They'll have to come back in with amended plan. They will have to provide public sewer. To that and then also connect. Yes, they will have to cooperate with each other. Okay. Is there a note somewhere that says that? There are notes, and we are recommending those notes on both your waiver report and on your blue sheet, as I stated, as well as Board of Health approval of the existing septic system. Very good. Any other questions? Yeah, Mike. Yes, sir. Tom, how big is lot one? 2.7 acres. It's 2.7, and yet it's septic tanked. When it was originally approved. I understand that, but my point now is the waiver is to let them continue to do that? Yes, sir. Yes, sir. It is, because it exists solely on proposed lot one. So we're granting them a waiver of the 10 acres? Yes, sir. You are indeed. Thank you. Other questions? If not, applicant, anything to add? steward spencer representing this property nothing to add tom did a great job we've read the conditions and we're okay with them and i would like to request conditional approval any questions for the applicant yes sir thank you hold on one second mr spencer are all through all three of those lots owned by the same party they are owned by two different entities but it's the same person that's a part of each of those entities. They will be recombined into one entity. Okay, so you're reconfiguring it and it's going to be all under one ownership? It will all be owned by one entity, yes. Thank you. Any other questions? Anyone else in the audience wish to speak on this plan? Seeing none. If there's no further questions, I'll close this part of it and open it up for any discussion and or motion. We'd have two separate motions, one for the subdivision plan itself and then the other for the waiver. Yeah, I'm ready. Mr. Penn? I move for approval of Plan 2014 Day 70-F as proposed by staff. With revised conditions? We put the revised conditions, and I understand we're going to do a second motion. Yes, sir. All right. A motion has been made for approval with the revised 11 conditions. Do we have a second? Second. Yes. A second has been made. If there's no further discussion, please vote when it comes up on the screen. That motion passes. Mr. Penn? I further move Plan 2014-70F granting the waiver of the land subdivision regulations. Thank you. Do we have a second? Motion's been made and seconded for approval of the waiver associated with Plan 2014-70F for the reasons listed by staff. Please vote when it comes up on the screen. That motion passes. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Spencer. Let's see where we need to. Next, on page two, to be planned 2014-94 Elf Coventry Belmont Farm. You do have a waiver before you that's also on a white sheet. Mr. Chairman, members of the Planning Commission, the next item is item C on page 2. It is Plan 2014-94F Coventry, also known as Belmont Farm. This is a proposed final record plat sub-dividing property in this location. This is Citation Boulevard. Georgetown is a relatively short distance in this direction. Coldstream is here. Here we have the extension of Remington Way and the little bit of R4 development that currently exists. On this plan, they are showing an extension of Remington Way, along with Gatton Way, to this location here. This is a 30-acre tract that they are proposing. This is a 13.8-acre tract. This is P1. There are no plans to develop this property at this time. They do intend to build this section of Remington as well as this portion of Gatton Way, and they intend to do that with the development of this 30 acres. And this is the development plan that you just approved on your consent agenda, and we wanted you to see this for informational purposes. Again, Remington Way, Gatton, you can see the access off Gatton. Here's Remington Way, access off of Remington Way to serve this development. It is a large, about 10 acres under roof, 520,000 square foot industrial facility is planned for this site, this 30-acre site. You can see from the scope of this construction as well as the need for them to move forward as expeditiously, as quickly as possible on this development is the reason they have requested the waiver that you see before you today. They would like to coordinate the construction of these public improvements, and it's the street improvements, with the development of this site. And, of course, obviously it's going to be a very large construction project. Your staff and your subdivision committee recommended approval of this plat, subject to, of course, the granting of a waiver to Article 4-7 of the land subdivision regulations. That is the substantial completion requirement of your subregs that requires that these public improvements be built or a surety be placed. Your subregs generally call for a surety to be a letter of credit or a similar mechanism. There is some flexibility in the type of mechanism they use to post their sureties, including cash. We wanted you all to be aware that there is some discussion about the appropriate surety, but it will be a surety 100% to cover the cost of the public improvements. I believe they may even be required to post above that to cover the cost of the public improvements. apparently, as you all are aware, Mr. Haymaker has been requesting these types of waivers frequently with his school sites because they, too, coordinate that development with the school sites. In this case, their intent is to coordinate with the construction of this large industrial facility. So that's the reason for your waiver. Staff is recommending approval of the waiver along with the final development plan. If you have any questions, I'll be happy to try to answer them. Mr. Pym. Tom, I assume that's just not scale, but if that building is 10 acres, where's the other 20? Well, it should be to scale, and it's a very, you're right, it's, I don't know the word I want to use right now, but it looks bigger than what it is relative to the property. I think some of it's the configuration of the site. Well, as a country guy, I used to looking at acres. That just doesn't jive with me. Mr. Penn, it's 520,000 square feet. It's probably closer to 15 acres than now. Say 10,000. 10,000 square feet. Yeah. Well, it's 521,000 square feet. Yeah, about 10 acres under roof is what. But it's a large, big building. More than 10. Yeah. Okay. I don't know if we need a math lesson today. Other questions? Applicant? Thank you, Mr. Martin. Mr. Chairman, members of the commission, Rory Kaley, the partners. I have Tim Haymaker here with me, and we're in agreement with Tom's presentation and request approval. Thank you, sir. Any questions for Mr. Kaley or Mr. Haymaker? Anyone else in the audience wish to speak on this plan? Thank you, Mr. Cayley. Seeing none, if there's no further questions, I'll close this part and open it up for discussion or motion. Yes, sir. You want a motion? Yes. Mr. Chairman. Jump in there. Okay, Mr. Chairman, I move approval of Plan 2014-94F Coventry-Bellman Farms, as with the conditions outlined by staff. Thank you. Do we have a second? Second by Mr. Brewer. please vote when it comes up on the screen motion passes and then also a motion for the waiver yes we'd like to request a motion to approve a waiver to article 4-7 d1 of the land subdivision regulations which requires the substantial completion of public improvements prior to the certification of the final record plat thank you do we have a second motion's also been seconded please vote when it comes up on the screen. That motion passes. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Kaley, Mr. Haymaker. Not your math? Page 3, Development Plans, DP 2014-86, Morningside Market. Are we ready to present that? Mr. Chairman, we have receive the affidavit in the intervening time. The sign was posted in a timely fashion with the correct date and time for your meeting today. Do we need to present this then? Can we? A very brief presentation. Okay. Yes, sir. Thank you. This was on the Ksenich and it had to be pulled because there was some doubt as to whether posting of signs had been done. I knew there was a reason you came over here. Good afternoon. We're looking at DP 2014-86 Morningside Market. Try to color up as quickly as possible. This is located over off of National Avenue and then Gribbon Drive. And then we have Walton Drive down here. This is an adaptive reuse project. Some of these here are already buildings that are on the property. They were coming in. They wanted to put in two new buildings right there in the pink. So we had our standard conditions. The first nine are just typical sign-offs from different governmental agencies. We had addition of existing and proposed easements denote the land lease information for the CSX railroad property. They have brought in leases to show that they have an agreement to be able to use part of the railroad for their parking and access property to the rear of these properties here. They've brought that information in, so we just want to have them denote that information on the plan as far as the lease de-book page, that sort of thing. Then we have to note all required public improvements and amenities previous to approve for the adaptive reuse to be completed prior to building permit for 737. There is some crosswalks. There's a garden that's located on there. It's in orange, which you can barely see. we asked for all the striping and parking to be marked prior to the building permit so that we have all those improvements for the adaptive reuse program that was approved when this came in. With that, we had it recommended for approval. Thank you. Is the applicant here? Anything to add? Harvey Johnson, the robbers group. We accept all the conditions and request for approval. Thank you, sir. And once again, this was pulled from the consent agenda simply because there was some question as the posting of the sign and affidavit, but verification and the affidavit did show up. So any questions from the commission? Anyone else in the audience wish to speak on this plan? Thank you, sir. If not, I'll close this part. Do you have something else to add? No? If not, I'll ask for a motion. Yes, ma'am. Mr. Chair, I move for approval of DP 2014-86 Morningside Market with the conditions noted by staff. Thank you. Seconded by Mrs. Plumlee. If there's no further questions, all those in favor, please vote on the computer screen. Thank you. Motion passes. Next, at the bottom of the page, DP 2014-88, James Property, 3025, Blake James Drive. We do have a revision that is on a green sheet that is before you. Good afternoon. Yes, sir. Good afternoon, Mr. Chairman, members of the commission. This is Development Plan 2014-88, an amended final development plan for the James property, a property located at 3025 Blake James Drive. The subject property is located between Manowar Boulevard and Todd's Road along Palumbo Drive, close to the intersection of Manowar. The subdivision committee had recommended approval. the purpose of the amendment was to add a building right here on the plan for an additional 5,000 square feet. We'd received from the applicant on the day of subdivision a revised development plan as well as work that the applicant had completed which took care of a significant number of the conditions. The staff therefore reviewed this revised plan and we recommend approval subject to the usual conditions and there are about three remaining conditions here that the relate to the square footage and to an easement and to the pending Board of Adjustment case which will be heard on the 21st of this month. We'll have any questions or comments. Any questions? If If not, applicant, okay with everything? Thumbs up indicates yes. Okay. Thank you, Ms. Jones. Anyone else in the audience wish to speak on this plan? If there's no further questions, I'll entertain a motion. Yes, sir. Mr. Chairman, move approval of DP 2014-88, the revised conditions. Thank you. Motion's been made and seconded for approval with the revised 10 conditions. Please vote when it comes up on the screen. That motion passes. Thank you. Moving on to page 4, middle of the page, it's Williams Property DB 2014-90. there is a waiver to be discussed that's on a white sheet and then also findings on a goldenrod sheet. Mr. Martin. Mr. Chairman, members of the Planning Commission. On page 4, item E, DP 2014-90, Williams Property, Lot 1, This is a final development plan. This is for property located on Todd's Road, which is the frontage in this location. Here is the Andover Golf Course Country Club Clubhouse Pool Parking Lot. There is a Baptist church in this location. Back here, we have the Andover Green and the subdivision in this area. You may recall at the zone change for this property that there was a lot of discussion about this connection, Todd's Road improvements, access to Todd's Road. You can see they are proposing 19 townhouses. There were 20 originally. They've modified it, dropped it down to 19. You can see they are proposing this access with access easements to serve the townhouses. This is a final development plan and a preliminary subdivision plan. They do intend to subdivide these properties. There is an access at this location into the Andover Country Club. This has been reviewed, and the plan has been recommended for approval, subject to a lot of very standard conditions on a final development plan and a preliminary subdivision plan. The only real issue that remained was, of course, the termination of Andover Green into this property. And there is a waiver request before you to end it, as you see here, with no access to Andover Green. You can see the short stub of Andover Green in this location. Staff is always concerned about these types of terminations, about the provision of services and public safety to developments, and to our neighborhoods. In terms of public safety, our fire department folks are pleased to have this access point along with this access point, and they're comfortable that they can serve this development adequately and safely. Now, staff would be remiss if we didn't tell you that we like connections, and not just for public safety, but for the efficient provision of services as well, and because we think it's a good idea for bike and ped and people to be able to move back and forth. However, there are a couple of issues that we've reviewed with the applicant. The grade change from Andover Green, which was discussed at length at your zoning change, impacts the property and impacts the extension of Andover Green into the property. There also would be some issues with some visual blockage of people utilizing that street due to the change in grade. and the fact that it is a small subdivision, Andover Green. There's 33 houses. It's a loop street. Andover Green is. And then this is a 19-unit townhouse development. It's a small development. That helped mitigate a lot of staff's concerns. The Kentucky State Transportation Department is happy with the access point and with the improvements that are being done to Todd's Road. There will be a sidewalk along Todd's Road, And there was a lot of discussion about the need to provide a sidewalk into this property. Staff has consistently discussed interior systems on all these developments. We, again, we like our pedestrian systems. We like our sidewalks for folks to be able to use and not have conflicts with vehicles. The applicants a lot of times don't see the need for that. But that was discussed at your subdivision committee at some length. And, of course, we do have a provision for your pedestrian planner to approve pedestrian facilities on this plan. But your subdivision committee has recommended approval. Staff has reviewed the waiver, and we are recommending approval of the waiver to you today. And if you have any questions for me, I'll be happy to try and answer them. Mr. Wilson. Mr. Martin, how many feet are there between the cutoff there to the left all the way down to the part where there's no entry? Well, over here on this side. I think he's talking about Andover Green. I'm not sure. Again, what? Andover Green here? Right here. Right. Between there? Yeah. About 150 feet. If I didn't get the sign and went down there, how would I turn out? Would I have to back up and turn out of that? Yes, sir. You will. that is one issue that you would have to back up now um and you'd have to it's a wide street and there's room for you to make a couple of movements and turn around um but uh i would assume it would be wise to put a no outlet sign there but again people do miss that but there is no provision for any kind of turnaround okay thank you other questions applicant Mr. Chairman, members of the commission, Rory Kaley here on behalf of the developers we are in agreement with Tom's presentation and the waiver the one issue I guess we need to have a little clarification on would be number six, the pedestrian planner spoken with him as to what he was looking for as far as his sign off and he was wanting sidewalks brought through and to each and every individual unit. And real quickly, this unit is set up so that your driveway in this inner courtyard here is a private spot and private space. This is also where the essential front door is. So we would like to propose that we can turn the sidewalk from Todd's Road up to the gated system here. But once we go internally, we'd like to leave it up to the individual builders and stuff to figure out where they're going to put their connections. So we're willing to make the connection from the development out to the public streets, but we didn't want to have to run it through the, entirely through the system and try to show on a development plan where all the individual door connections would be. And I guess to follow up with Mr. Wilson's question, Andover Green has been functioning as shown there for more than 15 years. The schools, mail, solid waste, everyone's got a system they've been using for many years. No one has gotten stuck there at that 150-foot end of that street. And that's what we're proposing is to leave it as is so that our development can be unique and unto itself. Mr. Kaley, right now, your proposal, I don't remember it being on the plan, would be to put sidewalks in from Todd's Road to the gated entrance, into the security gate itself. Yeah. Okay. And then internally they'll figure it out as they build. Okay. Questions from the commission? No. Anyone else in the audience wish to speak on this plan? No? Okay. Mr. Sally or Mr. Martin, would we need some sort of condition clarifying the sidewalk issue? Yes, sir. You need to clarify that or else there will be a long discussion with the bike bed planner for this plan to be served. I understand. Tom, while you're up there, what's your opinion on that? staff in general is a strong supporter of pedestrian systems. We like our sidewalks. We think they're necessary. We think they are beneficial to a lot of folks, including the folks that live there, folks that may visit there, folks that may come in to work there, that sort of thing. We also understand, though, that in private developments of this sort, there is strong reluctance to install sidewalks. It is not unusual in townhouse developments for us to deal with that issue. Well, if I understood Rory correctly, they were going to put sidewalks in. They just don't know exactly where they're going right now. Is that right, Rory, or are you contemplating not having any sidewalks? Well, personally, I'd say none are needed. I have 19 units, golf homes oriented, gated community. I don't believe there will be high speeds. I don't think there will be any conflicts, anyone walking to the golf course or to visit their neighbors. there will be some sort of connection points I'm sure as the houses are developed and people start having patios and those connections but we're not looking to run a public sidewalk through the system other questions if there's no other questions I'll close this part of the meeting and open it up for any discussion and or motion. Right now the proposal would be to take the sidewalk system from Todd's Road into the security gate and let it stop there. All right. one way or the other as mr. Martin said when you know I think we need a motion to clarify our emotion needs to clarify that with an with another condition okay I'm ready go yes sir yep I'll make a recommendation of approval of DP 2014 dash 90 with the 16 noted conditions adding the 17th condition that sidewalks be provided from Todd's Road to the security gate. Okay. Second. Motion's been made and seconded for approval with now 17 conditions. Mr. Berkeley, I guess we probably need to change number 16 to denote. Yes. Okay. Are you okay with that? Yes. Second? Mr. Cravens? Yes? Okay. So the motion would be for approval of DP 2014-90 Williams property with now 17 conditions, changing number 16 to denote and 17 adding the language sidewalks up to the security gate. Any questions in regards to the motion? If not, please vote when it comes up on the screen. That motion passes, and we also need a motion for the waiver. And recommendation of approval of the findings of waiver DP 2014-90. The motion has been made and seconded for approval of the waiver DP 2014-90. Please vote when it comes up on the screen. That motion also passes. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Kaley. Next, at the bottom of the page, DP 2014-91 Providence Montessori School. We have eight conditions, no revised conditions, waivers, or anything. Just simply... Mr. Martin. Mr. Chairman, members of the Planning Commission. Item F on page 4 is DP 2014-91 Providence Montessori School amended. This is an amendment for the Montessori School that was recently approved. Here is 4th Street in this location with the access to the old Florence Critton at home. I know you are all very aware with the layout, the parking, the access, the discussions about that access. access. Here are the permaculture and the features that they're going to add as part of their curriculum. The purpose of this amendment is to add or gain approval of an access point to Pilgrim's Court in this location, amend the parking and the dumpster location along with this access point. That's the purpose of the amendment. This is public right-of-way. It's been there for many, many, many years. At one time, it was Fifth Street extended. The plan was reviewed and recommended for improvement. There was an issue, and there was that last condition on your plan about whether or not a waiver was required. Article 21-8 of the zoning ordinance governs the applicability of your subdivision regulations to a development plan. And it states that they apply if there's a need to subdivide the property or an intent to subdivide the property. Those of you on the subdivision committee may recall that Mr. Rochelle, on behalf of his client, stated that they had no intent to subdivide the property. And when you look at the development pattern proposed, you can see that it does not appear to be any need unless there was a significant redevelopment of the property. Staff took the opportunity between your committee and this hearing to discuss this with our council as well, and we have determined that there is no need for a waiver at this time. So we are recommending approval of this amendment. I'd be happy to answer any questions you may have. Any questions for Mr. Martin? Yeah, I've got some. So your recommendation would be we can now delete number nine. Okay. Mr. Wilson? It's not necessary. Mr. Penn? Tom, probably ought to be stated that the traffic flow now will come in off Pervor's Court and try to exit out off 4th Street. Is that still correct? It is staff's understanding, and the applicant could elaborate it, that this is a sort of a secondary entrance for staff and solid waste service and that sort of thing, but not for general use. They do intend to have their children be able to walk through this access point and down the street and go to the park and the area and that sort of thing. Okay. Any other questions, Mr. Martin? Applicant, anything to add? No, you're good. Thank you. Thank you for being here. No, you had your chance. I'm sorry. I've been told to clarify. I turned in the affidavit and the photo that's required as well for the, it's not in, signed. Yes, signs have been posted. Thank you. Okay. Oh, oh, one-way movement. Yes, it is hopeful that the drop-off movements in the morning will be easier. If you come in Pilgrim, kids are getting out on the passenger side next to the school, exit out the front. That's what we're talking about. Yeah. Yeah. The gates will open during those, at the rear of Pilgrim Court, will be open during the school hours, pick up and drop off, and most likely closed up in non-operating hours. Thank you, sir. Okay. Anything else from the commission? I would ask if there's anyone else in the audience, but we've all left. I would just add very briefly, I think it's something you all need to hear. There were two residents from Pilgrim Court here earlier. Staff spoke with them, and then so did the applicant. They saw no reason to remain. But as you know, we, like you, are always happy to see residents and interested citizens show up. And so it's good to know that they were able to communicate with the applicant and are satisfied that any concerns they have will be addressed, which is why they did not remain for this part of the hearing. Thank you for noting that, Mr. Martin. Question from Mr. Penn. Is traffic engineering okay with traffic flow on this? We just don't want to leave you all out back there. Okay. Anything else? If not, I'll close this part and open it up for a motion. Mr. Chairman, I make a motion for approval of DP 2019-91, eliminating condition number 9. Second. motion has been made and seconded for approval with the now eight conditions to lead in number nine no further questions please vote when it comes up on the screen that motion passes thank you we do have a performance bond and letter of credit that we need to address mr. chairman yes sir move approval of the release and call bonds thank you do we have a second motion has been made and seconded for the release and call upon from the memorandum date of November 13th. Please vote when it comes up on the screen. That motion passes. Commission items. You do have an official meeting and filing schedule that has been approved for 2015. It is before you. It seems to be of importance to a lot of people. Other commission items? Staff items? audience item if if y'all don't want to redo this again I'll entertain a motion for adjournment motion been made in second and all in favor please say aye any opposed thank you folks thanks thanks staff for being concise now I got to go back to the