from month to month, but the net profit looks to me like it usually varies quite a bit from month to month. Well, actually... Did you factor that into your $5 million in the whole? What we have looked at, the payroll end of the net profit, of the occupational license fee, you know, we're pretty dependent on some big government entities in Lexington like Fayette County Public Schools and University of Kentucky. So with the state budget looking the way it's looking, I think for FY09, if teachers don't get raises and if UK actually has to lay off 700 people, that is all going to be directly related. We're going to see that directly in our payroll occupational license. Yeah, my question wasn't about the occupational license fee. It was about net profits. My question was, have you included under license and permits the net profit? Yes, sir. But it varies from month to month and it's not a constant, a relatively constant source of income. That's exactly right. And it looks like in April is the biggest month, according to these colored bar graphs. Right. But we factored in the fact that April is usually a really strong month. We're looking at this on a month to month basis over 10 years. So we're not just saying we're behind where we need to be today. We're projecting out where we think we're going to be at the end of the year based on the fact that we know we still have some strong months, but those strong months are not going to be as strong. We were projecting that they're not going to be as strong as they need to be to not be short. So are you still think that this minus number will hold for net profits through the year? Well, actually, it's not Or is that to date? What I gave you, just a second, is what we think it's going to actually do to date, which is, I mean, what we think it's actually going to do to the end of the year, which is going to be slightly under where we were last year. Okay. So that's an end of the year. Yes, sir. That's an end of the year projection. That's not a current. No, sir. Okay. And I agree with Council Member Blevins. If you can give us, in past, we've had this report come every month from the budgeting. Right. And it would include what the past months, I mean, the past year would have. So we can get an idea looking at it. Right. And also, that would help us understand which sources of revenue fluctuate throughout the year and not just go on a steady state somewhat like the OLF, which maybe is a steady state going down, which is not so good. Let me apologize for not having those reports. The Division of Budgeting usually doesn't run those until after we have closed the month. And because we haven't closed January, they haven't run that report yet. So I kind of wanted to get something to you that was in draft form so you would have something. But clearly, once we get all the data cleanup done with STARS, we intend to start closing by the 10th of the month. So those reports would be available to you by the time budget finance meets each month. Okay. And when you get this one done for this month, you don't need to wait until the next budget finance meeting. Okay. Are there any other questions regarding these reports? Mr. Beard has a question. Thank you, Dr. Stephens. I guess one of my hopes and desires, dreams maybe for STARS, was that we would be able to get data out by, if I might use outdated terms, SIC codes or economic segments and be able to tell if we're having expansion or contraction in whatever segments we might have and how we might address those from an economic development point of view. And that might be a question. Maybe the bill has probably chewed on more than you may have, because I think I've mentioned this to him a couple or three years ago. I think that's one of the things that we hope that the task force, the finance task force that's been put together... Okay. Just a second. Excuse me. I can address the SIC or currently it's NAICS, I believe, North American Industry Standard, whatever. And we try to track those within the license fee system, which has not gravitated over to STARS yet. However, we're limited as to what we can classify, such as Walmart is the leading grocer, leading tire, leading retailer, and so we can only assign one number to someone like Walmart. And so we have challenges as far as classifying different entities by NAICS code, and we're trying to look at expanding that. And if we have a replacement system, they all seem to have that already embedded into off-the-shelf programs, but we have been working toward being able to slice and dice by industry code. Something Commissioner Cove mentioned concerning University of Kentucky and losing 700 employees, but at the same time, Dr. Karp's over there hiring doctors right and left at three and four X the salaries. So maybe the net result from the university is going to be a plus rather than a minus just because the headcount might change. The salaries may still go up. Is that a fair assumption? And would we know that, I guess, is the question. I'm not sure we would know that type of detail, and actually, I'm hesitating here because of confidentiality. I'm not sure that I could share that with counsel. University of Kentucky could share that because it's their business, but as far as that level of detail within the occupational tax, I'm not sure that I could discuss it. But to answer your question, I don't think we would know the answer. Chairman, they're subject to open records just like we are. Well, I'm talking about withholdings and individual withholdings. Well, not individuals yet. I'm still thinking about groups like the hospital as a group. Hospitals as groups we can report on. Specifics for a taxing entity, I have to have reasonable confidentiality of tax returns. Okay, Bill, thank you. Okay. If there are further questions, I'm informed that the electronic machine is now working. So if anybody has a question, when I see a blank, is there any further business to come before the committee? Yes. Ms. James. Do you see my name on there? I just wonder. I do have a question, but I just want to make sure it was working. Oh, okay. I got the name James right here. Okay, perfect. That's me. I have a question for Commissioner Coe. The personnel, the FY08-09 projections where you have 16.9, you ran down the list of what that included, and I think I missed a couple. Can you go down that list again? Sure. It was 3.8 million in sick checks, 2% increase in police and fire retirement fund, 1.1 million for the new police class in June, 4.9 million in health insurance, 6.6 million in retirement payouts. And I don't have the number, but it's the steps for the police and fire and the corrections contract. Okay. And 6.6 for retirement, is that, regardless of anything, is that automatically something that has to go in annually? No, it's not. This is a one-time. One-time. This is a one-time. Well, every time someone retires, we have a payout, but this is a one-time deal because of the window of opportunity closing for some people. So across government, both our government and in state government, we expect a large number of employees who can retire to retire this within the next 10 months. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Commissioner, several of the members of the committee asked if you would be kind enough to email the list of expenditures that you, to answer Mrs. James' question. Sure. Is there any further business to come before the committee? Hearing none, we are adjourned. Thank you very much. Oh, baby.