Music Music Music Music Music Music Music Thank you. I'm sorry. Thank you. With the work session if we can, if council members take your seats. Would like to get started. I think we have a quorum present. One, two, three, four, five, seven, eight, nine. Thank you. This is the Tuesday, January 4th, 2017, Urban County Council work session. Welcome everybody. First item on the agenda is public comment for issues not on the agenda. I don't believe anybody has signed up for items not on the agenda. I'm sorry, this is items on the agenda. Yes. Get it straight. And I believe, are you signed up? Is this on an agenda item? On the agenda item. If so, please proceed. Give us your name and your address. Greetings. My name is Ben Armstrong, 400 East 5th Street, Lexington, Kentucky, 40508, mailing address. No residential address. The item that I'm communicating about with the item that just had been passed, my old Richmond roll of that property. Mr. Armstrong, I'm going to have to interrupt. That item, that was a special meeting and that meeting has been concluded. That item is no longer on our agenda. Then I do apologize. That's the only item on the agenda that I wanted to communicate about. Thank you. then you may comment later at the end of the meeting as usual on items that are not on the agenda if you have further comment. And that would be appropriate to talk about that or any other issue at that time. Thank you. That would allow us to move to requested rezonings and docket approval. There's none, no docket this week. That brings us to approval of the summary. Motion to approve. Second. Second. Motion and a second to approve the summary. Any discussion on the motion? Seeing none, all in favor, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? That motion carries. Next item on the agenda is budget amendments. There are no budget amendments. That brings us to new business. Is there a motion to approve? Second. I have a motion and a second to approve new business. Discussion on the motion? If you have discussion on new business, please log in. Councilmember Evans. I have a question. I have a motion to place an item on the docket. Is this the appropriate time? I can't hear. Thank you. I'm sorry. I think, yeah, council reports would be a good time to do that. Okay. So the answer's no right now. I'm sorry. It's okay. Thank you. Any further discussion on the motion? Seeing none, all those in favor, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? That motion carries. That brings us to continuing business and presentations. The first item is NDF. Is there a motion to approve? So moved. Second. Motion to approve the NDFs. Any discussion on the motion? Seeing none, all in favor, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? That motion carries. Next is the summary from Environmental Quality and Public Works. Council Member Farmer. Thank you, Vice Mayor. These are the notes, beginning on page 18 of our packet. This is the November 15th meeting. We approved our summary and then continue with the presentation and conversation we had been having about private streets, an issue that Council Member Mazzotti had put in in this form and committee. The focus of the conversation had to do with denoting where private streets are and where maintenance does or doesn't take place on behalf of the government at large. After a fine discussion, a motion was made by Council Member Vizzotti to approve the proposed text amendment requiring developers to install a permanent sign denoting, quote, end of public maintenance, unquote, at each location where a private street intersects or otherwise abuts a public street and refer the item to the full council. This was seconded by Palomen and at the time passed without dissent. I would so move on behalf of the committee at this time. I have a motion. Is there a second? Second. I have a motion and a second. Discussion on the motion? Seeing none, all in favor, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? That motion carries. The resolution that goes along with this will appear before our council meeting, but it's not present in the packet today. Thank you. Then we had a really great discussion about street trees, something that's still an emerging process and opportunity for the city. We asked for some additional information to come back to us. Then we had really a great conversation about some of the funding and some of the opportunity and some of the cost-share things. This item will remain in committee because there's a lot to be done there, and it was a fine discussion. We looked over our items removed to committee and made a couple of changes there, but there was no other actions at this meeting, and that would complete my report. Thank you, Vice Mayor. Thank you. That would bring us down to, I think that's it for continuing business and presentations. It allows us to go to Council Reports. If you have a Council Report, please log in. Council Member Evans. This is where my make my motion, okay. I move to place on the docket for Tuesday, January the 31st, 2017, a resolution authorizing and directing the Division of Traffic Engineering pursuant to code of ordinances, Section 18-51 to install traffic calming devices on Highcrest Drive between Wayland Drive and Brinell Drive. So moved. We have a motion, is there a second? Second. Motion and second. Discussion on the motion? Council Member Farmer. So staff has approved these and these have met the warrant for that type of activity? They have. Thank you very much. Thank you, Vice Mayor. Thank you. Further discussion? Seeing none, all in favor, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? That motion carries. Council Member Evans, anything else? Looks like not. Council Member James Brown. Thank you, Vice Mayor. I just want to continue to pat the fire department on their back for their efforts in recruiting and engaging the community. I know I was in church Sunday and happened to turn to my left, and the chief was sitting next to me, Chief Chilton. And in the lobby of the church, the diversity officer, Mr. Lucas, and the chief was out there, and they were actually recruiting. They had a table set up. They were taking applicants. So I know I said it last week, but it seems like every time I turn around, I see the fire department out aggressively recruiting new applicants. And then I'd also like to announce that I'm having a neighborhood leaders meeting tomorrow at the new senior center over in Adelow Park. I know we're going to be joined by Council Member Farmer, who's going to welcome us to the 5th District. then Commissioner Ford is going to introduce us and let Christy give us a tour of the facility and answer any questions and expose some more residents to the benefits and the amenities of the Senior Center. Thank you. Thank you. Council Member Gibbs. Thank you, Vice Mayor. You may have noticed I'm not a woman, but I did go to the Women's Rally in March on Saturday, and it made me very proud of my city. It's estimated 5,000 to 10,000 people there. Whatever the number, everyone was in a good mood, kind and respectful, and it was a whole lot of fun. And there were a lot of really clever signs that put me in a very good mood. Among the kind and respectful people were dozens of our police officers. The crowd was much bigger than expected, and our police just did a marvelous job, and they're being commended. So thank you to the police, and thank you to all the citizens who attended. It was just a marvelous event, very uplifting. Thank you, Vice Mayor. Thank you. Councilmember Plowman. Thank you, Vice Mayor. I just wanted to share last night I attended the first in a series of community conversations, and it's organized by Together Lexington, which you might have seen promoted in the Herald later. The topic last night was race relations, and we had a good cross-section of folks from our community, and we broke into small groups, and I thought it was very effective. There's going to be another one on race relations on February the 2nd. These were held at the Legends in one of the rooms down there at the Legends ballpark. But the next one is February 2nd, and it's race relations. February 6th and 13th, gentrification. February 16th and 20th, police crime. March 2nd and 6th, drugs and heroin. March 7th, I'm sure you can Google this and get all these dates. But affordable housing and homelessness. and then April 25th and 27th, LGBT inclusion. But I thought it was well done, a lot of good dialogue, a lot of new folks that I really had not been at the table with, so I'd encourage you to find the dates and join us. It was from 5.30 until about 7.15. Thank you. Thank you. Council Member Bledsoe. Thank you, Vice Mayor. Last week, Vice Mayor and I hosted Councilor Xu Min, who is a representative from the Chinese Embassy in D.C., and they were here meeting with people from Frankfurt and in Lexington about the importance of cultural exchanges. And it was a really interesting meeting, and I hope we do get to go to China one day, Vice Mayor. It would be a fascinating trip. What I really want to do is invite you all to join me at the Chinese New Year celebration, which is Saturday, February 4th at the Lexington Opera House. It's at 7 p.m. It's hosted by the Chinese American Association. There's a number of events that day. It's a lot of fun, a lot of family things, a lot of presentations and holiday markets. So that's from 4 to 645 on that Saturday. There's also an NDF going around council for this event. I'd like to show the Kentucky Chinese American Association that we do continue to support what they do for our community. It's the largest growing international community in Lexington. So thank you. Thank you. Council Member Lamb. Thank you, Vice Mayor. I have to last Tuesday I gave the report out of the General Government Social Services Committee for November 1st, and I need to make an additional part of that report out. Obviously, I don't have a habit of looking at the back of my page, and I missed a whole section on security cameras in the parks. in the parks. So with my colleagues allowing me to go through this today as it should have been last week. So at the November 1st, 2016 General Government and Social Services Committee, we also discussed about security cameras in the parks. And Council Member Fred Brown introduced Mr. Dean Markham, who presented the item. Mr. Markham discussed the current security cameras in place at parks and recreation locations. He reviewed the advantages and disadvantages of installing security cameras and stated that the pilot project for Berry Hill Park will consist of four high-resolution cameras and a DVR. Mr. Markham reviewed the installation requirements and costs related to that project. Council Member James Brown stated that the cameras will not address all issues and concerns, but will be a tool for law enforcement to use to help prevent incidences in parks. Ms. Akers, Council Member Akers asked if the $30,000 cost was per camera, and Mr. Markham stated that the cost was all four cameras, including installation. Council Member Akers asked if this park was chosen based on crime data. Mr. Markham said Chief Barnard and the Division of Parks chose the park as a pilot based on data. Council Member Evans stated that this may not be the most cost-effective way of dealing with kids in the park after dark and brought up potential constitutional issues with installing surveillance. Council Member Bledsoe asked if they looked at displacement of crime, and Mr. Markham responded that this is a possibility. Council Member Lamb asked about private property shown on the installation map and stated her concern that the cameras may record beyond public property. A motion was made by Council Member Fred Brown to move the security cameras and parks item forward to the full council for consideration, including a pilot program at Berry Hill Park contingent on funding. Seconded by Council Member Gibbs, and the motion passed on an 8-1 vote. And I so moved. Well, hold on. Let me get through these. And the motion was made by Evans to amend the motion to remove Berry Hill Parks as the location of the pilot program. That motion failed for lack of a second. Then a motion was made by Council Member Aloni to amend the motion to provide for mobility of installed cameras, and that was seconded by Council Member Henson. That motion failed by a vote of 3 to 7. So the motion that I need to move forward to my colleagues today is the motion that was made by Fred Brown to move the security cameras and parks item forward to the full council for consideration, including a pilot program at Berry Hill Park contingent on funding, and that was seconded by Gibbs. I so move. Motion and a second. Discussion on the motion? So what will it do? That's a good question. It will allow this pilot program at Berry Hill Park, and I believe the funding had already passed through a couple of maybe last week's work session through budget amendments. So does that answer your question, sir? It does, and thank you for illuminating that part of it. I, uh, may I, may I please, um, having not been a part of the committee, the committee at that time, and I am now a part of it. Um, I'm just personally really uncomfortable with the idea of placing, uh, cameras in parks. That's just a personal thing of mine. And I will not vote against, uh, I will vote against this motion just because I feel like there are other answers before surveillance. Thank you. Anybody else wish to speak to the motion? Council Member Maloney. I do have concerns about parks, and there was a lot of good questions. And one thing is, after dark, the park's supposed to be closed. And to me, is Berry Hill closed after dark? And if it is, why are we putting cameras out there? It's Barry Hill closed after dark. And is there a reason, I mean, have you had problems out there that you know of that would be the reason we're putting it out there? Is this? Good afternoon. There certainly have been some issues at Berry Hill Park. The park is stated to close at dark. So I know we've got the new skateboard there. Do people come there at dark at night and use the skateboard? Certainly. So this would be a reason why we want to put it there so we can monitor, temper, and see how that works. I have, okay, I understand now. Thank you. You're welcome. Further discussion on the motion? Council Member Evans. My initial concern, or I believe the initial concern was the crime. And, again, I would just reiterate that we don't have the statistics over at Berry Hill, and that was my initial issue, was that we don't know if this is the most appropriate part to put these cameras in. although I do just generally disagree with doing this, but the bigger issue was that this park was really just picked at random. And I think we should, if it would pass, that would perhaps consider just giving the authority for a park that is perhaps more in need for true security safety issues, if we're going to go that route. I'm not in agreement with this, but that was really my concern is that this one was just kind of picked out of the air just based on the district that the council member lives in, understandably. But, again, the general issue was about safety, and I just don't think that this park is perhaps the one that needs the most attention. Thank you. Thank you. Councilman Mascuchfield. Thank you, Vice Mayor. I just was going to, I know when we discussed this, one of the things that we did discuss was this was kind of a pilot. As we look at whether we want to continue to do this and the cameras that we were going to use were going to be able to be used at other areas in the future. So it wouldn't necessarily be the one park. I don't serve on that committee anymore, but that's what I remember the discussion as. Commissioner? This park was, you're correct. I think everybody that's spoken is pretty much correct on this topic. This has been an ongoing conversation within parks for two or three years, as a matter of fact. If Peck Ambers were going to be part of our security plan. The reason that Berry Hill was chosen was because it's a park in a small condensed area. We don't have money in a pilot project to put in a lot of cameras. This would be basically one installation that can cover the area where a whole lot of activity goes on with the new skate park. you all passed a banning program where it allows parks to ban people. The first time we used it was in Berry Hill because of some conflicts that occurred and a police officer got assaulted. So I can't say that it's the most, the highest crime rate or the data would speak to that, but what's occurred over the past year coupled with how the park is set up made it the most logical to be a pilot park that we had available to us. Thank you. Any additional comment? Seeing none, all those in favor of the motion, please say aye. Any opposed? No. Okay. If we can, if you would register your vote electronically. I think I got it. Here we go. I believe that reflects passage of the motion. Thank you. I see Council Member Lamb. Thank you for allowing me to. That was the report out that I needed to correct from last week, and if my colleagues would allow me now to have my council comments, I would really appreciate that. So I wanted to congratulate Ms. Joanna Rhodes and the director and her staff at the Family Care Center. Last week, we were notified that the early child care program received an achievement of five stars by the state's Division of Child Care and Department of Education. And just a little knowledge about that is Kentucky All-Stars is our state's expanded five-star quality rating and improvement system for early care and education programs. The STARS system recognizes programs that have made a commitment to continuous quality improvement. The five stars is the highest rating that a program can receive and is granted based on high scores in the following domains, classroom and instructional quality staff qualifications and professional development family and community engagement administrative and leadership practices and i just want to do a major kudos to the child care team and miss joanna rhodes for their work and of course commissioner ford for recognizing them i received this email last week and meant to read it last tuesday at work session but obviously that didn't happen either so the other thing i want to mention is is that we are having the fourth district is having its first district-wide meeting this Thursday night at 7 p.m. at the Tates Creek Public Library branch, and we're going to have Director Ken Armstrong there to speak and address questions about code enforcement, and I am encouraging all my fourth district constituents and anybody else that wants to come along. We always have a great question and answer session, and I hope that I see a lot of my constituents at this meeting. The last item is as a result of this zoning ordinance that had to be changed today. I just want to express my concern with the fact that this clerical error happened in our law department, and I know that a lot of other people are upset and worried. But I just, this is one of those things as a seasoned government employee and now council member that I have said all along, and perhaps I didn't say it loud enough, but now I'm going to say it loud enough, and now I'm in a position where I can actually make it happen as long as my colleagues will join me on this. We, as a government, when we have tenured employees, and I mean people that have been here 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 years, and they have a huge, a vast amount of knowledge and experience in their belt and in their head, it is a shame that we don't have a process for our employees to have some type of a transition where that the person coming in can gain some of that knowledge and experience from the person leaving, whether they're retiring or resigning. It doesn't matter. I feel like that as a result of not having proper transitions in the past is probably one of the reasons that this happened with this ordinance. So what I am going to do is move it into my committee, General Government Social Services Committee, to discuss creating a transitional process for this urban county government when you have a tenured employee with specialized knowledge and experience so that we can have continuity for our employees and their replacements. I so move. Second. I have a motion and a second. Discussion on the motion? Aye. Council Member Massotti. Thank you, Council Member Lamb, and I certainly can appreciate what you're trying to do here. I think there was a lot of frustration last week. However, I don't want to micromanage anyone, and I think that the message was certainly given that there were some issues as far as transitioning, and I think it's up to each department or division head or whatever to make sure that their employees are experienced or groomed or whatever they are, what needs to be done as far as the educational process in order to afford us the best decisions. So I get the gist of what you're trying to do, but, again, I don't want to micromanage. So that's my thought on that. Thank you. Thank you. Any further comments on the motion? Council Member Lamb. I will, with respect to Council Member Mazzotti's comment. I don't consider what I'm talking about micromanaging. I consider there being a process being put in place for when this situation arises, and I don't consider that micromanaging, and I would appreciate my colleagues' support in this. Thank you. Thank you. Further comment? Councilmember Evans. Probably as one who was a state employee and was hired specifically to replace someone who had been in my position for probably a good 20-plus years. And then me leaving to take another job and she having to come back because that was the one person in the state that could do what needed to be done. So I appreciate Councilmember Lamb's thoughts and understanding where that comes from, because as a government employee, it is a sad thing to see so many years of knowledge walk out that door, because transitions are tough just in general. But I've experienced that myself and know how difficult that is. I think perhaps what Council Member Lamb is talking about is perhaps setting some kind of policy. I'm not opposed to that idea. I don't necessarily consider it micromanaging because we don't know what's going to come out of it. It could certainly just be, you know, end up just being, well, this is what we think, and just a request for all of government in the future. So I don't think it hurts to talk about what perhaps the options are and what policy could come out of it. I don't know. I'm not in human resources. It might be something where we could create a transition position. I don't know. But I'm certainly willing and interested to have that conversation because I do agree. It is, it's a unnerving thing for everyone. Um, when someone with so much knowledge, uh, walks out the door and, and people make do and, and get by. And a lot of the time it's left up to that person leaving to transfer that knowledge. And I was lucky enough to have someone who was willing to do that and actually had time to, um, have a year to shadow them. And that was my saving grace, so I wasn't so uncomfortable when she left. So I appreciate that and think that there's perhaps some way that we can address that. And again, I don't necessarily consider it micromanaging. And we can just explore it. I think that's all Council Member Liam is asking, and I'm not opposed to that. Thank you. Further discussion? Council Member Maloney. I support what Council Member Lamb is doing. I also want to first of all say that CAO Hamilton and I, we've sat down on this because we've had some people, when I first came on, that threatened to quit and they said how important the job was. And I think CAO Hamilton and I, as a commissioner, we put policies in place for if someone was, And I'm not saying that, but if someone is to die and he's the only person or she's the only one that can do it, we've got to have a plan to make sure that government is being operated. And I think we've got that out there. I just think there are some loose ends, but overall I think we are on the right track. But I think what C.A.L. can bring that to the table and show that we are, that every department is working on a policy and a procedure, and I think she's already been doing that. So I don't think we have a problem presenting that, and I think I support. But what happened the other night, and I've been here a long time, and that was a unique situation. We spent a year and a half changing that from a condition that planning never did before, and we spent years trying to change that. Well, they finally did it. And it was a new program that they did. So there will be mistakes made the first time you do this. And I'm not going to lose any sleep over it, but we learned. And I just want everybody to understand, we make mistakes. And it can be fixed. And this one was fixed today. And we could go on. There will be mistakes made that we can't fix. And those are the kinds that I get a little upset over. So I just want everybody to realize it was the first time we've done a zone change like this. So don't, I wouldn't get up and on. I was a little frustrated, but it was new for us. So I just want to let everybody know that mistake can be made and the mistake can be fixed. So I just want you all to know I thank you for getting it cleaned up today. Thank you. Thank you. Further discussion on the motion? Seeing none, all in favor, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? No. Yes, if I can have a screen, people can reflect their votes. That vote reflects passage of the motion. Anything further, Council Member Lamb? No, that completes it, and thank you so much for the time. Thank you. Council Member Farmer. Thank you, Vice Mayor. I need to strike a similar tone and stir the pot just a little bit differently. Each one of us comes here to do the very best that we can on behalf of the citizens. And the council depends upon those in the audience and the administration to help us. We're on the firing line here. We're making the decision. And as it relates to the zone change and its long iteration and the time it took on Thursday night, we unfortunately as a body ended up in a position where actions or inactions by others placed us in a difficult position of not being able to perform at our best and not being able to perform really at all until we came back to clean up and make better. So I guess mine is a different sort of appeal, not a mentoring one or a transitional one. Mine's more about give the council what it needs. Give the council quality information. Give the council quality advice. Give the council the chance to act rather than have the action taken away from them. Over the course of the last year or more, I mean, there's been some ongoing things in more than one area, and I don't really want to spread the displeasure here, but there have been questions on council about certain areas, and there were questions over this weekend about some help we did or didn't receive. And I just think in the broad form, rather than speaking to a person, a group, a division, a department, I think, as the mayor continues to outline in each of his merged government addresses about making Lexington a great American city, to have that, we need to have great people giving us great advice consistently with authority and knowledge. If we have those tools at our disposal, we can act correctly nearly every time. We have a very collaborative council. People come, people go, but we work together. We make great decisions together, but we need great help to do that. And I ask each of you to redouble your effort in that respect to help us make Lexington a great American city. Thank you, Vice Mayor. Thank you. Council Member Maloney. Thank you. Listen to the Mayor's stated emergency speech today and listen to his concerns about our kids today and the problems we have. I'm excited to hear that we have 25 employees that are going to be mentors. And to me, that's going to be one of the most important things that we've done in a long time because getting out there and hitting those kids young and show that they're the mentor out there, show what their jobs are, they have a chance to get and make it. It's a lot better than what we've been doing lately. So I am tickled to death that Laura Halffield was able to put those folks together, 25, on the first time. That's amazing. And hopefully we'll get a lot more. But I think, and echo what the mayor said, this needs to go citywide. And to me, the most important is to get mentors out there for the kids. And I'm really excited what Laura Halffield has done. And hopefully we'll get a lot more than that. But thank you. Thank you. No one else has signed up to speak, but I do have one thing that I want to add, maybe two. But the first is that I was asked by Council Member Hansen and the Commission for People with Disabilities to appoint an ADA task force. And I am officially doing that. I sent an email to council members, but I'm officially doing that today. And this is a task force which will explore options regarding how the city of Lexington can enforce compliance with the Americans, with Disabilities Act in private businesses and how that aligns with regulations at the state and federal level and consider current building codes as they relate to accessibility. Task Force will forward any recommendations to the full council by October 1st 2017 for further review or action and Jason Jones who is the affiliated with the Kentucky Congress on Spinal Cord Injury will chair that committee. And then if I can, I want to add my comments to those that have been made about the hearing on Thursday night. I think it's already been indicated that this was a rather special circumstance and it was special in a number of ways which I want to lay out briefly. First, because of changes in the zoning regulations, this was the first time since I've been on council, perhaps the first time ever, when an appeal of a decision by the Planning Commission came to the council. It had both a zone change and a conditional use approval. There was some confusion about how to separate those two things. So we'd never done that before. Secondly, the timing of this was such that the issue was resolved in the Planning Commission before our council break, and we were gone for close to five and a half weeks, and so we came up to a calendar problem. The council has 60 days or 90 days, 60 days after a decision by the Planning Commission to take action, or if we do not do that, then the action taken by the Planning Commission stands. We got to within two days of that deadline. So we did not have much room to maneuver. And then there was a clerical error in the ordinance itself, which meant that it had to have a first reading. And without going into all of the detail, instead of a majority of council being able to take action, We needed 10 members of council to suspend the rules and get a second reading before the calendar time lapsed. So all of those things were going on at the same time. We had a four-and-a-half-hour hearing on Thursday night to try and come to a conclusion. because of all of these factors, we ended up with having to have a special meeting this afternoon. But having said all of that, I would like to commend Council for coming to an agreement about how to move forward on this today. It was not what perhaps any one council member thought was a perfect resolution, and it was perhaps not what either of the people who proposed the change or the people who were opposed had hoped would occur. But I believe it was a reasonable solution. And when finally we had to make a decision, we made it fairly amicably. So hopefully that clarifies it for people who are wondering what in the world all the conversation was about. And hopefully we will not be in that combination of circumstances conspiring to make our work more difficult than it needs to be. So my comments. Anybody else wish to be recognized for council comment? Seeing none, that allows us to move on to public comment for issues not on the agenda, and I believe, Mr. Armstrong, you are signed up. City Council members, Mr. Chairman, Mr. President, United Nations. Today I want to address the weapons of mass destruction, the minds of individuals in our community, the liars, the thieves, the homosexuals, the violent promoters, the uneducated, the non-believers, the mentally ill, the physically disabled. I just pointed out all labels that will cause a great nation, such as America, to fall. I learned where the weapons of mass instructions are. They're in our homes, our churches, our schools, our government, our supermarket, our food pantries, our soup kitchen. Mr. Calvin, Mr. Letha. They're in our communities. There is a major question at hand that I have at this moment you may not have the answer to. What are your plans for the weapons of mass destruction? Maybe you want to not answer. It should be read about and only experienced once you're found to be destruction. The guns that Walmart, Cash America, Pawn Shops, Bud Gun Shop, Guns America, Dick's Sporting Goods, just to name a few. This is what most Americans believe to be the weapons of mass destruction. Americans, it is your minds, your brains, your thoughts, your influences that hurt each other and influence others to hurt one another. There is no laughter and pain, whether it be physical or mental. If I knew you and you knew me, if all of us could clearly see with inner sight divine the meaning of your heart and mine, sure we would differ less and clasp our hands in friendliness, our hearts would pleasantly agree if I knew you and you knew me. There are protests being held in our communities and none come weakly to comment on public issues. I believe their protests are in vain. I marched with them. I shouted with them. I shout alone. Most members in these protests are weapons of mass destruction, sparking the flame inside individual's mind and then abandoning them in the movement they created. The individual then marches alone. I march alone. I first marched with Occupy and they abandoned me. The 99% abandoned me. They are your weapons of mass destruction. Integrity is a very important word. It means having the quality of being honest and having strong moral uprightness In front of people and when no one is looking, God is looking. Integrity in a movement means everything. Without it, no one is loyal. And I want to say thank you for letting me speak. You all have a wonderful day. Thank you. I believe there is no one else signed up for public comment. I would entertain a motion to adjourn. Motion and a second. Without exception, we stand adjourned. Thank you.