# Planning Commission Subdivision Items - June 14, 2018 > Auto-transcribed civic record · June 14, 2018 - **Permalink**: https://meetings.lexingtonky.news/meeting/4540 - **Source video**: https://lfucg.granicus.com/player/clip/4540?view_id=14&redirect=true - **Date**: 2018-06-14 - **Last revised**: June 14, 2018 - **Length**: 4,365 words > ⚠️ **Auto-generated content.** Audio from the official Granicus video was auto-transcribed with OpenAI's open-source Whisper large-v3-turbo model, run locally by The Lexington Times. Structured facts were extracted with GPT-4o; the narrative summary was written by Anthropic Claude. Verbatim wording may contain errors. See [methodology](https://meetings.lexingtonky.news/about/methodology) or [report a correction](mailto:editor@lexingtonky.news). --- ## Meeting Overview The Urban County Planning Commission convened on June 14, 2018, at 1:32 PM in the Council Chambers of the Urban County Government Building at 200 East Main Street in Lexington, Kentucky, with Chairman Penn presiding. The commission addressed eight agenda items during the session, taking a total of nine votes on various planning and development matters. The meeting saw mixed outcomes, with six items approved, one item withdrawn, and one item postponed for future consideration. No public comments were heard during this session, and no presentations were given to the commission. ## Attendance The following members were present at the June 14, 2018 meeting: • Will Berkley • Headley Bell (arrived late) • Mike Cravens • Larry Forester • Karen Mundy • Mike Owens • Carolyn Plumlee • Frank Penn • Carolyn Richardson **Absent:** • Patrick Brewer • William Wilson **Late Arrival:** • Headley Bell Nine members were present for the meeting, with two members absent. Headley Bell arrived after the meeting had begun. ## Votes and Decisions The commission took action on nine items during the June 14, 2018 meeting, with all votes passing unanimously. **Minutes Approval** [timestamp: 00:30] Carolyn Plumlee motioned to approve the minutes of the May 10, 2018 meeting, seconded by Karen Mundy. The motion passed unanimously 9-0 with all commissioners voting in favor: Will Berkley, Headley Bell, Mike Cravens, Larry Forester, Karen Mundy, Mike Owens, Carolyn Plumlee, Frank Penn, and Carolyn Richardson. **Case Withdrawals and Postponements** Karen Mundy motioned to withdraw PLN-MJDP-18-00017 (Pappert Property amendment), seconded by Carolyn Plumlee. The withdrawal was approved unanimously 9-0. [timestamp: 02:00] Mike Cravens motioned to postpone PLN-MJDP-18-00047 (Cave Hill Place Townhomes amendment) to the July 12, 2018 meeting, seconded by Mike Owens. The postponement was approved unanimously 9-0. [timestamp: 04:00] **Consent Agenda** [timestamp: 06:00] Mike Owens motioned to approve all Consent Agenda items, seconded by Larry Forester. The motion passed unanimously 9-0. **Development Cases** PLN-MJDP-18-00040 (Interstate Service Center/McDonald's amendment) was approved unanimously 9-0 on a motion by Karen Mundy, seconded by Carolyn Richardson, with Condition #19 changed to "Resolve vehicular and pedestrian access to Stanton Way." [timestamp: 10:00] PLN-MJDP-18-00041 (Hillenmeyer Property - West amendment) was approved unanimously 9-0 on a motion by Will Berkley, seconded by Carolyn Richardson. [timestamp: 15:00] A related waiver for the same property was also approved unanimously 8-0. [timestamp: 18:00] PLN-MJDP-18-00049 (South Farm Marketplace, Outlot 4 amendment) was approved unanimously 9-0 on a motion by Mike Cravens, seconded by Mike Owens. [timestamp: 22:00] **Bond Actions** [timestamp: 25:00] Mike Cravens motioned to approve the release and call of bonds, seconded by Karen Mundy. The motion passed unanimously 8-0. ## Appointments The commission made three appointments to the Nominating Committee for Commission Officers during the June 14, 2018 meeting. The following individuals were appointed to serve on the Nominating Committee for Commission Officers: • **Carolyn Plumlee** - appointed to the Nominating Committee for Commission Officers • **Headley Bell** - appointed to the Nominating Committee for Commission Officers • **Larry Forester** - appointed to the Nominating Committee for Commission Officers All three appointments involved the same action of appointing members to the Nominating Committee for Commission Officers, which is responsible for selecting candidates for leadership positions within the commission. ## Approval of Minutes [timestamp: 00:30] The board reviewed the minutes from the May 10, 2018, meeting for approval. Carolyn Plumlee and Karen Mundy participated in the discussion of the minutes. The minutes were approved without any recorded objections or amendments to the previous meeting's record. ## Pappert Property Amendment The Pappert Property Amendment (PLN-MJDP-18-00017) was addressed during the meeting, with the primary outcome being the withdrawal of the proposed amendment [timestamp: 02:00]. Karen Mundy and Carolyn Plumlee served as the key speakers for this agenda item. The discussion centered on the feasibility challenges that had emerged regarding the Pappert Property project. The amendment was ultimately withdrawn due to determinations that the project was not feasible to proceed as originally planned. The specific details of what made the project unfeasible were not elaborated upon in the available materials, but the decision to withdraw represented a definitive conclusion to this particular development proposal. The withdrawal of PLN-MJDP-18-00017 effectively removed the Pappert Property Amendment from further consideration, concluding this agenda item without the need for formal voting or additional deliberation on the merits of the original proposal. ## Cave Hill Place Townhomes Amendment [timestamp: 04:00] The Cave Hill Place Townhomes Amendment (PLN-MJDP-18-00047) was briefly addressed during the meeting, with Mike Cravens and Mike Owens serving as key speakers on the item. Rather than proceeding with a full discussion or presentation of the amendment, the item was postponed to allow for additional preparation time. The decision was made to move the Cave Hill Place Townhomes Amendment to the July 12, 2018 meeting agenda. No substantive details about the proposed amendment were presented during this meeting, as the focus was on scheduling the item for future consideration. The postponement suggests that additional information, documentation, or stakeholder input may have been needed before the amendment could be properly reviewed and discussed by the body. The outcome of this agenda item was a postponement, with the understanding that the Cave Hill Place Townhomes Amendment would receive full consideration at the July 12, 2018 meeting. ## Consent Agenda [timestamp: 06:00] The consent agenda was presented for approval during the meeting, with several development plans included for consideration. Mike Owens and Larry Forester served as key speakers during the discussion of these items. The consent agenda contained multiple development plans that were grouped together for efficient processing. This procedural approach allows routine or non-controversial items to be approved collectively, streamlining the meeting process. The agenda items were ultimately approved as presented, indicating that no significant concerns were raised that would require individual consideration or extended debate of the development plans included in the consent agenda. ## Interstate Service Center (McDonald's) Amendment [timestamp: 10:00] The Planning Commission reviewed agenda item PLN-MJDP-18-00040, an amendment to the Interstate Service Center development plan to redevelop Lots 1 & 1A for restaurant use. Karen Mundy and Carolyn Richardson served as key speakers during the discussion of this McDonald's development proposal. The amendment focused on modifying the existing development plan to accommodate restaurant operations on the specified lots within the Interstate Service Center. The Commission ultimately approved the Interstate Service Center (McDonald's) Amendment with conditions. The approval allows for the redevelopment of Lots 1 & 1A specifically for restaurant use as requested in the application. While the extracted data indicates this was a discussion item that resulted in conditional approval, the specific details of the conditions imposed, any concerns raised by commissioners, or the nature of the debate that occurred during the review process are not available in the provided materials. The approval of PLN-MJDP-18-00040 represents the Commission's decision to move forward with the proposed restaurant development at the Interstate Service Center location, subject to whatever conditions were established during the meeting proceedings. ## Hillenmeyer Property - West Amendment [timestamp: 15:00] The commission reviewed agenda item PLN-MJDP-18-00041, an amendment to the Hillenmeyer Property development plan focusing on revisions to Lot 160. Will Berkley and Carolyn Richardson served as the key speakers during the discussion of this amendment. The proposal involved modifications to the previously approved development plan, specifically targeting changes to Lot 160 within the Hillenmeyer Property development. A significant component of the amendment included a request for a waiver regarding access spacing requirements. This waiver was necessary to accommodate the proposed revisions to the lot configuration and ensure proper vehicular access to the development. The commission ultimately approved both the amendment to revise Lot 160 and granted the requested waiver for access spacing. The approval allows the development to proceed with the modified lot design while providing the necessary flexibility for access requirements that may not have strictly conformed to standard spacing regulations. This action represents a continuation of the ongoing development of the Hillenmeyer Property, with the amendment addressing specific design and access needs that arose during the planning process. ## South Farm Marketplace, Outlot 4 Amendment [timestamp: 22:00] The Planning Commission reviewed application PLN-MJDP-18-00049 for the South Farm Marketplace, Outlot 4 Amendment. The proposal involved adding building square footage to Lot 4, Outparcel 4 of the South Farm Marketplace development. Key speakers during the discussion included Mike Cravens and Mike Owens, who presented details about the proposed amendment to the existing development plan. The amendment was approved by the Planning Commission, allowing for the additional building square footage on the specified lot within the South Farm Marketplace project. ## Performance Bonds and Letters of Credit [timestamp: 25:00] The meeting addressed the release and call of performance bonds and letters of credit as outlined in a staff memorandum. Mike Cravens and Karen Mundy served as the key speakers for this agenda item. The discussion focused on routine administrative matters related to contractor performance bonds and letters of credit that required board action. The speakers presented details from the prepared memorandum regarding which bonds were recommended for release and any calls that needed to be made on existing financial instruments. The board reviewed the staff recommendations without significant debate or concerns raised during the discussion. The straightforward nature of the bond releases and calls appeared to be standard administrative business that followed established procedures and protocols. Following the presentation and brief discussion, the board approved the release and call of bonds as detailed in the staff memorandum. The approval allows staff to proceed with the recommended actions regarding the various performance bonds and letters of credit under consideration. This agenda item represents typical municipal business where local governments manage financial instruments that ensure contractor performance on public projects. The bonds and letters of credit serve as financial guarantees that work will be completed according to contract specifications, and their release indicates satisfactory project completion or other contractual milestones have been met. --- ## Decisions - **Motion** — passed (9-0): Approval of the minutes of the May 10, 2018, meeting - **PLN-MJDP-18-00017** — withdrawn (9-0): Withdrawal of Pappert Property amendment - **PLN-MJDP-18-00047** — postponed (9-0): Postponement of Cave Hill Place Townhomes amendment - **Motion** — passed (9-0): Approval of Consent Agenda items - **PLN-MJDP-18-00040** — passed (9-0): Approval of Interstate Service Center (McDonald's) amendment - **PLN-MJDP-18-00041** — passed (9-0): Approval of Hillenmeyer Property - West amendment - **Motion** — passed (8-0): Approval of waiver for Hillenmeyer Property - West - **PLN-MJDP-18-00049** — passed (9-0): Approval of South Farm Marketplace, Outlot 4 amendment - **Motion** — passed (8-0): Approval of release and call of bonds --- ## Full transcript To the heart, I've got news for you. Baby, I'm not so smart, but I know that it's cool. I know that it's cool, yeah. Yeah, I know that it's cool, baby. I know that it's cool, yeah. I know that it's cool, yeah. I know that it's cool, yeah. This is the best. I know it all. Thank you. That may not wait for this single year Watch and see your nights are clear Hey, even the sky's so very dear, yeah You're a shining star, no matter who you are Shining bright to see what you can truly be, what you can truly be Yeah Without your love I'm nothing but a mega Without your love A dog without a bone What can I do I'm sleeping in this bed alone Baby, you're my angel Come and save me tonight You're my angel Come and make it alright Come and save me tonight guitar solo When I break down and cry Don't even know is it why Baby, baby, baby You're my angel Come and see me tonight You're my angel Yeah, yeah, come and make it all right. You're my end. Yeah, come and save me tonight. Yeah, you're missing out. You're my end. Yeah, come and save me tonight. Come and save me tonight Thank you. I sit there with a blank expression I say you can't go on anymore It's not like me to come out and help you Maybe I've been down this road before Been living in the shadows And you come out slow Now you're in the shadow Got to ride along Now the dream is shining These days are through Maybe something matters It's not just for you So you're gonna go far But it's time to lay down I've been too long Standing still is all I know Wherever you need me You reach out and set me in motion Looking out on that long wind valley You're telling me I've come so far And you're the reason I finally got there You're the reason it's been so hard You've been living in the shadows Now you're here at the car Now you're in the saddle You've got to ride a far Now you're pushing a little harder I can show you too Every day we're calling We're looking to be you Somewhere gonna go far broke Somewhere down I've been too long Standing still All I know Whenever you need me You need a job To set me in motion guitar solo Thank you. I'm not shy I will kick you up when I stumble ¶¶ ¶¶ ¶¶ ¶¶ Thank you. The End ¶¶ Thank you. Thank you. ¶¶ Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. ORCHESTRA PLAYS ¶¶ Thank you. ¶¶ ¶¶ ¶¶ Thank you. ¶¶ We'll call the meeting the Planning Commission to order. Approval of the minutes. Is there any corrections or additions to the minutes? If not, the chair will entertain a motion. Go ahead, Karen. Mr. Chair, I move approval of May 10th meetings as corrected when they were sent to commission earlier. Okay. Second. Motion has been made and seconded for the May 10th minutes. Vote when it comes up. passes thank you postponements and withdrawals do have any postponements withdrawals mr chairman members plan commission rory caley with ea partners page one item one papert property mjdp 18-17 we'd like to withdraw this plan Okay. Is there a reason for the withdrawal? I don't think it's feasible anymore. That's fine. Thank you. Motion. Mr. Chair. Yes, ma'am. I move for approval of the withdrawal for PLN-MJDP 18-17, Paffert property amended for the reason stated by the applicant. Is there a second? character by Carolyn Plumlee. Vote when it comes up on the screen. Yes, sir. Thank you. Any other postponements with draws? Mr. Chairman, members of the commission, my name is Matt Carter with Vision Engineering. If you turn in your agenda to page 4, item H, MJDP 18-47 Cave Hill Place Town Homes. I'd like to have a one month postponement. I believe that would be for July 12th and the reason being we want to first we're going to move the entrance back to where we originally had it but there is some additional changes to the buildings we want to work on and so we would like to keep this plan active and have it be heard on the July 12th. Okay, sir. You've heard the reasons. Chair will entertain a motion. Mr. Chair. Mr. Craven. Move postponement of Plan 18-47, Cave Hill Place, for one month. July 12th. July 12th, yes, sir. Okay, motion must have been made in a second. Vote when it comes up on the screen. Thank you, Mr. Carver. Any further postponements of withdrawals? If not, we'll move the consent agenda. Ms. Wade. Thank you, Chairman Penn. There are several items that qualify today for the consent agenda, and they are listed on the tan sheet that's at your place, and this is available in the back of the room as well. I will read through those, and if there is anyone in the audience that wishes to have one of those items removed from the consent agenda, if you'll just raise your hand when I read that and let me know, we'll have a full presentation on those cases. In addition, any of the Planning Commission members may also ask to have an item removed from the consent agenda for a full presentation. All four of the items this afternoon are development plans that were recommended for approval by the subdivision committee. The first appears on page 2 of your agenda. It is item B, PLN MJDP 18-36. The application is Lansdowne Subdivision Unit 18-D, Section 1, also known as Red Coach Trail. This is an amended final development plan for property located at 409 Laredo Court. the next item on our consent agenda this afternoon is just below that on our regular agenda page two item c it is pln mjdp 18-38 and the application is for bluegrass business park lot four also known as pemberton farm or burke hawkinsmith and maggard and the applicant is wayne supply this is also an amended final development plan for property located at 1900 jaggy fox way third item on the consent agenda appears on page three of the regular agenda it is item d pln mjdp 18-39 application for bluegrass executive park unit 1c block e sections 1 and 2 also an amended final development plan and that property is located at 2205 thunder stick drive and then the last item on our consent agenda this afternoon appears on page four of the regular agenda it is item g this property is also located in the expansion area so there are a few extra items i will note with it it is a development plan pln mjdp 18-43 for new market property unit 6 and that property is located at 1263 angus trail because it's in the expansion area it does require an expansion area master plan compliance statement and the planning commission does have a memo from the division of planning located at your seat the purpose of this particular development plan was not to change any of the overall physical development but to amend the design standards and so we made a finding that that did not change their previously identified compliance with the expansion area master plan so the planning commission is not in need of making any new findings related to that on this case that property did require a sign to be posted again because it's in the expansion area and the engineer associated with said plan has provided an affidavit and a photo of the sign that was posted on the property again I will ask if there's anyone present in the audience today or if any of the Planning Commission members would like to have any of those four items pulled from the plan from the consent agenda and have a full public hearing on those. Seeing none, I believe the Commission can act on all four collectively. Thank you. Is there any questions about the consent agenda? If not, the Chair will entertain a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented. Mr. Chair, Mr. Owens. I'll move for approval as consent agenda is read, taking note of the compliance statement on the new market property plan, MJDP Thank you. Second by Larry Forrester. Vote when it comes up on the screen. It's an agenda approved. I guess we'll get ready for our first development. Yes, sir. We'll move to our first item. We'll get the presentation slides up, and it does start on page, I believe, three of our agenda today good afternoon we are looking at major development plan 18-40 interstate service center for McDonald's this property is located off of Stanton Way the Stanton Way and Newtown Pike loop for the 7564 interchange McDonald's is currently located down here in the rear portion of the property they're proposing to build a new McDonald's closer to the Stanton Way and consolidate the property with the adjacent property and have a larger parking area for those coming in on buses and trailers with this plan well the subdivision committee has reviewed this the first eight conditions are typical sign-offs this plant this property being within the Newtown Springs world aquifer the plan went in front of them on June 5th and they were approved with no other conditions. We have several cleanup conditions on the plan and the last condition number 19 it says discuss the vehicular and pedestrian access to Stanton Way. When this plan was originally filed it had three access points to Stanton Way. They have been in contact with KC Coucher with traffic engineering and they have reduced the number of access points to the two that you see above. Enlarging this one so that they can have both, they took out the one access point in the center that was going to go right to the McDonald's store and combined it with the other one that was going to loop around the outside so they only have two points. So we believe that after talking with Casey, we believe that this condition can be changed to resolve there's still a little bit a couple tweaks that they want them that she has one such as pedestrian access from the hotel into the restaurant going across the property parking lot like in this location a lot of times you have people that are just going to come out of the hotel and go directly there instead of walking around on the sidewalk so casey would still like to work with them on getting that connection as far as a pedestrian if it has to be with steps the ada can go out to the sidewalk and make it into the restaurant with no problems so with that i'll leave it open to you all if you have any other comments or questions any questions from miss gall i have one the in the subdivision committee we talked about the sidewalk outside coming from the hotel to mcdonald's is that in the plan now no that's what we're saying that casey still had a couple items that she wanted to tweak and that being one of them she still wants to see their sidewalk from the hotel to the restaurant within the parking area whether it be crosshatch so that people know that they're going to be crossing the parking lot or the drive lane the access going away from McDonald's does not go through the hotel property on this plane? Correct. No, that is going to be removed. That was something, my understanding was an agreement with McDonald's and the hotel that they remove that access through the parking lot from the hotel. All right. Any other questions from Ms. Gallup? Applicant? Good afternoon. My name is Greg Kowalski. I'm with McElroy D.D. on a Mox, a civil engineer for the development. We do agree with the conditions that have been proposed and wish to continue to work with Ms. Kochner regarding the access from the hotel to the McDonald's restaurant. Are there any other questions that I could answer for the Planning Commission? Any questions for the applicant? You want to ask? If there's not, I'll ask you this question. What about the radius turn off Newtown Pike into the McDonald's? Has that been widened? Is it any farther away from the Town Pike? Yes, the radius has been expanded. The reason for it and the entrance is a little wider than the other access. This is to accommodate large tractor-trailer vehicles to enter to get to the rear parking lot. and also vehicles towing trailers or campers, and also for buses. You will see on, there's the hatched area on the, I don't know, on the left side. You'll see a sidewalk, which is a pull-off that is proposed now for bus passengers. So a bus can pull off and allow traffic to pass into the rear lot, and that way the bus can unload their passengers and they can have access through the ADA stalls, which are hatched in blue, to enter the store. Any other questions for the applicant? Is traffic okay with this, Steve? Okay. He indicates that it is. Anybody in the audience want to comment on this? But if there's no audience participation, then we'll turn it back over to the count to the commission for their pleasure. Should number 19 be resolved? Yeah. So we've changed 19 to resolve instead of discuss. Is that all right, Stat? Okay. Mr. Chair? Yes, ma'am. Mr. Chair, I move for approval of PLN MJDP 18-40 Interstate Service Center amended with the 19 conditions as set forth by staff, however, changing number 19 to resolve vehicular and pedestrian access to Stanton Way. Second by Ms. Richardson. Vote when it comes up on the screen. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Appreciate your work. Thank you. Where are we going now, Tracy? The very next item on your agenda, it's Hillemeyer Property. Bob, page three. Mr. Chairman, members of the Planning Commission, Turn your attention to page three, it's item F. This is a major development plan, 18-41, Hill and Meyer Property West, as amended. This is property that is located out at Sandersville Road in Citation. Here is your area, of course, of the amended plan in this location. Here is Citation. Over here we've had the B4 area that you recently rezoned. It's going to be developed for many warehouses. And then on back here, you just recently approved a subdivision in Sandersville Road. We'll be coming through here and connect at this location. It currently extends on up through here on over into the Masterson Station development. This is Mabel Lane at this location, providing some frontage for the development. This particular amendment is to change this plan. This original lot was proposed for all townhouses. It's just going to be the townhouse part of this development. This amendment, as you can see, is proposing 16 single family lots along Mabel Lane, with the interior being the rest of the townhouses, there are 24 townhouses that you can see within that development. They have an access drive proposed off of Sandersville Road, which will serve the interior of the development. When this was originally approved in 2013 with the townhouses along Mabel Lane, the access actually came off of Mabel Lane into the development to serve all the townhouses. Mabel Lane was originally Sigo Vista, and it went all the way through and was parallel to other streets in the area. It was terminated with a cul-de-sac when the assisted living facility, Magnolia Springs, was approved and constructed. In conjunction with this particular amended plan, there is a waiver request, and we have passed that out to you. And specifically, the waiver request is for this access. From Citation Boulevard to this proposed access point is approximately 350 feet, which meets the access standards. However, from this access point to Mabel Lane, it's approximately 168 feet, and the minimum is 250 on our local street and access standards onto a collector. The townhouse development technically is considered a high-density development, and so it is bound by those access requirements in your subdivision regulations. And those regulations state that they should not access local streets. And as a general rule, that is one that we have followed. In this case, they are allowed access to a collector, but they're supposed to meet the minimum standards. The issue, and again, it is in your waiver report that they have on this site, is one of topography. It's the grade. And as Sandersville and Citation were constructed, there is a 4% grade drop as you go towards Citation. And this, along with the rest of the site that they're developing, creates a problem for them to grade and to build the access drive and the pads for the townhouses without a lot of excessive grading. So by moving this access point closer to Mabel Lane, they actually will have much better line of sight and they will have much better ability to address their grade issues in this particular instance. They could move it closer to citation and meet this particular minimum standard, but in this case it would really create more difficulties with the grading of the entire site. So staff reviewed it with the applicant. We reviewed it with the Division of Engineering as well, and they concurred that there was, in fact, a significant grade issue on this property. And so with that, you see your pretty little pink handout, and these are the revised conditions. The applicant cleaned their conditions up very nicely, and you can see that what we have remaining are your standard sign-off requirements for a development plan, and this is a preliminary subdivision plan as well. And then item 12 is provided that you do grant the waiver to Article 6-8Q, and again, that is the access spacing requirement under your regulations. staff is recommending approval of the waiver to you today and I'll be happy to answer any questions you may have for staff any questions mr. Martin thank you applicant good afternoon mr. chair members of Planning Commission Nick Nicholson here on behalf of the applicant ball homes I think mr. Martin laid out the kind of issues with this plan very nicely and the reasons why a waiver request is required I'm happy to answer any specific questions you may have but this is one that clear hardship was based on this topography of the site and the only logical answer was let's put the access further away from the kind of collector collector intersection and closer to a local collector as opposed to the opposite especially when that intersection is going to be lit I think that this is going to resolve any issues that this may have so happy to answer any questions if you all have it, but we think we have a very good plan. Any questions for the applicant? Anybody in the audience want to comment on this one? If not, we'll turn it over to the commission and see where it goes. Mr. Chair? Yes, sir. I'm going to move for approval of Plan MJDP 18-41 with the 12 conditions. We'll do the waivers. separate uh yeah we probably will okay second the minister all in favor please vote when it comes up hey mr chairman i move for approval of the waiver based on the findings on our report thank you motion made and second to approve the waiver uh we'll vote when it comes up on the screen thank you you mr chair yes sir just to make note i think on the first motion my vote didn't register but i was voting yes if you'll correct that mr owens's vote thank you okay sure we're ready for the next Where are we going, Chair? Well, we're going to pull up the yellow sheets. We have revised conditions for South Farm Marketplace. This is MJDP 1849. This property is located at the corner of Man of War and Mrs. Phil Road. Excuse me, Mr. Goff. This meant we're on the bottom of page four. But we have a yellow sheet for revised conditions. Okay, go right ahead, thank you. At the corner of Manowar and Nicholasville Road, this is Rooster's Restaurant, which is located right behind the shell, coming in off of Manowar. They're coming in to add a, they had a minor plan for a covered patio and now they're wanting to enclose that covered patio, so they're adding building square footage to the building. They have revised the plan, and they have just the typical sign-off conditions for the first seven conditions. And then after reviewing it, they had a few other conditions. I'm sorry. A few other cleanup conditions we needed a little more work done on with the larger plan. This here you can see is a blown-up version of the rooster property. the addition being right here facing man o' war boulevard so we have several cleanup conditions on the large development plan they go to the back we just with this being one large development plan that has been over and over again we're just wanting to have them do some cleanup conditions that's pretty much what's left here on the overall development plan just for their area of the amendment we're not asking them to do the whole development plan but just there so that we can read it better like I said there was nothing else really to be said about this they have worked through and the understanding we brought up at subdivision committee it was where they were and they said that they have not enclosed it they have stopped there so they're only doing the patio roof and walls so they will wait until this is complete and signed and then they'll pro they'll enclose it any questions from this call Any other comments? No question, Ms. Gallagher. You're having an easy day. Thank you. Applicant, Mr. Carter. Matt Carter, Vision Engineering. We've reviewed the 16 staff conditions, and we are in agreement with those, and we'd be happy to make those changes. we we might ask you to put that picture up that'll answer the questions the subdivision committee phenomenal you want to explain mr carter what we're seeing uh yes what this is this is the patio that was previously approved and they have a building permit to cover the patio and what they've done is is where they've got their columns here they've done those in such a way that if they wanted to come back in the future they could enclose the patio and this plan that we have here before you is the plan that would approve them going ahead and enclosing the patio so they've basically just they've built it to a point uh you know where they're permitted right now and they can't go any further but but right now they're just waiting for this plan to get approved to finish the job they could go ahead with it like this and just use it as the open patio but they want to go ahead and finish it the reason i asked him to do that is we had a lot of discussion at the subdivision committee about was this one of these beg forgiveness or ask permission type situations and he brought that picture today to show where we are and to clear that up so Any other questions for the applicant? Anybody in the audience want to comment on this? If not, the chair will turn it over to the commission for discussion and or motion. Mr. Chair. All right. I'll move approval of plan 180049, the revised conditions. okay rise conditions as presented by staff is there a second second by Mike Owens all in favor vote when it comes up on the screen thank you thank you mr. Carter appreciate the picture all right I think this concludes our development plans we have a call of performance bonds mr cravens yes sir move approval of the release and call of bonds motion been made and seconded for release of calling bonds vote when it comes on the screen Motion passes. That concludes our development plans. We've done the performance bonds. Our bylaws state that we were to have a nominating committee for officers for the coming year. is to be done in June and to be presented to the Commission in July so Cheryl entertain three names or volunteers for three people to be on the nominating committee to make a presentation to us in July we have any any volunteers carol and plumley anybody else mr chair yes sir since uh dangers of walking out i'd be willing to nominate mr bell for this as well mr bell you leave you left at the wrong time all right we need another one who wants to be the third one. Mr. Forster. All right that's that's Carolyn Plumlee, Mr. Bell and Mr. Forster will be our nominating committee and they will report back. You all will select a chairman among the three of you and be ready to promote back in July. Mr. Chair, Mr. Chair, if I may add the bylaws actually asked that they report back at their work session with a slate next week. So at the work session on June 21st, they would present the slate, and then the election will take place at the subdivision meeting in July. Thank you for that correction, and it looks like you're all on a short leash. Okay. Is there anything else that needs to come up during this portion of the meeting? If not, we'll stand adjourned and we'll come back, we'll take a break and come back for our work session.