Just really being able to identify those persons and connect with them. It can be a challenge to find people who are residing outside, and sometimes it can also be a challenge to make sure that they feel comfortable to engage. Oh, that makes sense. Yeah. Well, this is a very unique program. I mean, I would say the majority of our citizens in Lexington, Kentucky, do not know that this goes on. And it's not because you don't try good PR, but I did not realize that this had gone on for as many years as it had. and I think the implication that it has towards funding, which obviously helps the city as well. So I'm sure you need volunteers. We do. Could you talk about that, what you do next in terms of if you want to volunteer? Yeah, absolutely. So we have a lot of information that's available on our Facebook page. That is facebook.com slash Lex End Homelessness. And on our Facebook page, we are posting information as to how people can get involved in this event. That includes if they want to volunteer to conduct the count, there is a sign-up form. There is a mandatory training that's going to be offered the week prior to the count, so that way people can make sure that they have the information. Today we have a Board of Adjustment meeting for March 11, 2019. What I'll do is I'm calling the meeting to order. First, we'll go through the minutes from February 11, 2019. I believe those were distributed. Okay. Those were distributed. I was not here last month, so I will not be participating. Does anyone have any questions or comments to those minutes? Hearing none, then I'll entertain a motion. Thank you. Do I have a second? Second by Mr. Needham. Motion carries. The next item I will go through the agenda for today. have a number of cases but looks like they've all have recommended approval from the staff so what I'll do is I will call each case if there's anyone here in opposition and I will put that case towards the end give you an opportunity if maybe you can work out your issues between the time now until time I call your case so the first item is yeah hello that's really loud Is it still that loud? Okay. I don't have a quiet tone. I've got one tone, and it's loud. So it's PLM B0819-8 David King's request for a variance. Is Mr. King present? Thank you, sir. Is anyone here in opposition to Mr. King's application regarding 673 North Martin Luther King Boulevard? All right. We'll have you heard first. The next item is PLN BOA 19-9 Lexington Habitat for Humanities request for a variance. Is the applicant present? Thank you, sir. Is anyone here in opposition to the application related to 230 East 6th Street? All right. You will be the second case called. The next item is PLN BOA 19-10 Randy and Sharon Gray. One of the grays present. Thank you, sir. Anyone here in opposition to that item? All right. We want opposition. We want that one to be heard. Is there any reason for you guys to maybe go out in the hallway and talk about the case to see if you can resolve? Nope? Oh, you can? Okay. I'd recommend, yeah, maybe you guys can talk about it. Maybe it'll be resolved. All right. The next item is PLM BOA 19-14, Gail and Thomas Williams. I think so. Okay. Okay. The Peninsula, is the applicant present? We are, and we would like to be heard on one of the conditions, so if you could basically put that on the to-be-heard document. Yep, we will. Thank you. In the meantime, is there anyone here related to this application? This is for 440 Squires Road. Okay. The next item is PLM BOA 19-13, On a Basis, LLC. Applicant present? Anyone here in opposition to this matter? This is for 2750 Meadows Street Lane. All right, we'll have this one to be no opposition. And that, I believe, is the last case of the day. Is anyone here on a case that wasn't listed? I've got a lot of people in the audience. Okay. Works for me. So the next item is if you plan on today speaking for support or an opposition of any cases, I need you to stand now so I can square you in. And please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Thank you guys. So I'm going to call up PLNBOA 19-8, David King's application. Please state your name for the record. David King. Thank you, sir. The staff has recommended approval with two conditions. Have you seen those conditions? I have. And you agree to abide by those conditions? I do. Okay. Does anyone have any questions for Mr. King? I believe this is the adjacent property that we heard a couple months ago. Mr. Chair, I would just like to ask Mr. King about parking. I think we talked about that the last time that adjoining lot came up. What's the situation with parking in that lot? There is street parking in front of the lot, but there's a retaining wall about four feet high. So parking in a lot that's 20 by 100 feet is blocked in all around by properties. I see. Okay, thank you, sir. I have one question. Is that going to be the front design? Not that we really have any comment about it, but that's quite a bit different. I was just trying to attempt to do a replication of a later Victorian kind of federal style, which is consistent with the clay house. So I'm wondering if I can do it at a reasonable cost and make something a minuscule version of the style of those houses. Well, there's a lot of progress going on in that corner, so it looks like you're working hard. Yeah, I'm trying. Okay. Any additional comments or questions? Well, hearing none, then the chair will entertain a motion. Mr. Chair, I move to approve PLNBOA 19-8 David King's request for variances to reduce the required front yard from 20 feet to 12 feet and to increase the allowable height of a building from 24 feet to 28 feet in order to construct a single-family residence within the defined infill and redevelopment area in a planned neighborhood residential R3 zone. at 673 North Martin Luther King Boulevard for the reasons summarized by staff in the case report and for the reasons recommended by staff. It's subject to the two conditions. Thank you, sir. Second. Any discussion on the motion? Hearing none, I'll call a vote. Motion carries. Good luck with your project. Thank you so much. You're welcome. The next case with no opposition was PLM BOA 19-9 Lexington Habitat for Humanity. Good afternoon. Good afternoon. If you could state your name for the record. Peter Carew. And you are with Lexington Habitat for Humanity? and Habitat for Humanity? Yes, sir. What's your position? Construction director. Oh, excuse me. Thank you, sir. Construction director. The staff has recommended approval based upon, looks like two conditions. Have you read those? Yes, sir. And Habitat's agreeable to abide by those? Yes, sir. All right, thank you. At this point, I'll open it up for any discussion or questions from the board. Hearing none, I will entertain a motion. Mr. Chair, I move that we approve PLN VOA 19-9 Lexington Habitat for Humanity's request for a variance to reduce the required side yard setback from 8 feet to 3 feet in order to construct a single-family residence within the defined infill and redevelopment area at a planned neighborhood residential zone at 230 East 6th Street for the reasons outlined by staff and subject to the two conditions. Thank you. Do I have a second? We have a first and a second. Any discussion on the motion? Oh, the second is actually Mr. Clark. Any discussion on the motion? We're hearing none. I'll put it to the vote. Motion passes. Good luck with your project. Thank you very much. Thank you. The next item on our agenda with no opposition is PLMBOA 19-14, Gale and Thomas Williams. Good afternoon. If you could state your name for the record. Nick Kites, Kites Construction. General contractor. Okay. Staff has recommended approval for this item. Did you just pass out something for us? One letter of support. Okay. Thank you. So we have one letter of support which we will pass down the line. The staff has recommended approval with two conditions. Has your client read those? Yes, sir. And they're agreeable to abide by those? Yes. Thank you. Any questions? or discussions from the board at this time. I was just curious. It's essentially a, it'll have a roof on it, the carport, but no sides. Correct. Okay, almost like an, and then a garage door. Correct. Okay. Is that a gabled roof or a flat roof or what is that? Gable. Gable roof, okay. Is this the final step? Correct. Yep. It's historic preservation approved in December. Thank you. I had a question for staff. Any exterior change of the property is subject to review by Division of Historic Preservation and the BOAR. So is that a new thing? Is it always? Since the property is in a historic overlay zone, they're required to get approval from the historic preservation and possibly BOAR. And then possibly BOAR. Okay. That's one. Okay. But if it wasn't an issue with the BOAR, then it would not have to be reviewed by us. That's the way it read to me. The issue we're dealing with is separate from the BOAR. Right. Yeah. I'm aware of that. Okay. Thank you. Any other questions? Hearing none, I will entertain a motion. Mr. Chair, I recommend approval of PLNBOA 19-14 Galen Thomas Williams, requesting a variance to reduce the required setback from an alley for an accessory structure to four feet in order to construct a new carport within the defined infill and redevelopment area in a high-density apartment R4 zone in the historic overlay district zone at 620 West Short Street, based on the recommendations of the staff and subject to two conditions listed. So move. Thank you. I'll second. I have a second for Mr. Glover. Any discussion on the motion? Hearing none, I'll call for a vote. motion passes good luck with your project thank you guys thank you the next item unopposed is PLM BOA 19-13 on a basis LLC. Thank you sir. State your name for the record. Nick Nicholson here on behalf of Antibasis LLC. We have read the staff report and the conditions and we have no objections. Thank you. Makes my job easy. Any questions or comments from the board on this application? Hearing none, then the chair will entertain a motion. I recommend approval of PLN BOA 19-13 Antibasis LLC's request for a conditional use permit for a non-commercial swimming pool in a high-density apartment zone at 2750 Meadows Suite Lane. based on the staff's recommendations and subject to the three listed conditions. Thank you. Do I have a second? I second the motion. Any discussion on the motion? Hearing none, I'll call it to a vote. Application has been approved. Thank you. Wait a second, Mr. Nicholson. I do not see yet the parties for the grays back in the room. No. So I guess against my better judgment, if you want to, I will call your case next. Well, how long will you think you'll be? Ten minutes, five minutes, something like that. I think we can go ahead and call it. So I'm now going to call the case of PLMBOA 19-5, the Peninsula. If you can state your name for the record. Nick Nicholson here on behalf of the applicants. I've also submitted a copy of my PowerPoint presentation to the staff for the record here. And Lori Kaley is also here with me. We are in general agreement with the staff's recommendation. There is just one objection to condition number two, which is prohibiting the amplification of outdoor live music. In kind of summary fashion, our objection is quite frankly very straightforward. There is no other pool in Lexington that has this condition on it. Further, there is no, I think, justification for this particular pool to receive this type of condition. It is a very small-scale apartment pool similar to the other pools that Ball Homes has built in its apartment complex. They are allowed the amplification of live music throughout Lexington, throughout all of all homes properties, and throughout even the larger scale kind of commercial operations that some pools have. The reason why we kind of object to this condition besides the disparate treatment for this particular pool is that we found it's a very nice amenity to be able to offer. Our management kind of companies will oftentimes have a guy playing guitar for a nice summer day. It's similar to what has occurred in other pools around town. We also offer the ability for any of the apartment residents to basically reserve the pool area if they want to have a birthday party. And occasionally that will also have some form of live music there. This isn't a, you know, there's no incentive to have any type of large-scale musicians, concerts, or anything like this. It's just the straight prohibition entirely would take away from a needed amenity and also we think is a very different treatment than any other pool in town. um to kind of show you where we are in in the grand scheme of things here is where the pool site is located on the property here is richmond road and squires road is coming down right here it is not remotely close to any existing residential uses as i'll show you here in a minute and it is part of an approved development plan. This is the site that is here that we are kind of here to discuss and this is the main apartment complex for the peninsula. This development plan I can confidently say has been arguably the most scrutinized development plan in the history of Lexington. Any concerns about music has never been brought up in the 18 plus hours of public hearings I've stood at this podium and talked about this very development plan the reason why I think this has come up at the last minute is what I'm going to chalk up to a marketing mistake the site plan that got put in place here contained one word entertainment it says outdoor entertainment pavilion I think that that was merely the marketing team of ball homes how they describe a certain amenity that they offer at the pool as opposed to an indication that we are going to have a amphitheater out there for concerts. Here is what the outdoor entertainment facility looks like at the other pools that Ball Homes has done. It is simply a way to get out of the shade while still being or get in the shade out of the sun while still being at the pool. As you can see this is not set up in any way to have a concert or have any type of kind of large loud event that would cause any type of issues with any residents here's another facility you can tell they are very similar in nature it is kind of a pergola like facility this is one that has a TV on there and I guess that is how we get away with calling it an entertainment pavilion Now, this is the distance to the nearest resident. It is 800 feet away across a large body of water and with a conditionally restricted 50-foot buffer area off the water itself. The next closest house is over 1,000 feet away, and across the river to the Denton area, it is over 2,000 feet away, and the only documented complaint that I've been able to find where someone actually left a name about a concern for this is almost 3,000 feet away at 2,800. And again, you will be able to see this large buffer area, which is on the Denton property, which is required to be there. And so there is significant buffer, not just in distance, but also in the existing kind of landscape. Now, I bring up the Signature Club because that is a commercial operation. It is a very large-scale commercial operation. I believe they have membership of 500 people, and it is not unusual to have 200 to 300 people at the pool. They are allowed specifically by this body to be able to have live music that has been amplified. It is a commercial bar. It is a restaurant with food service. When it got its permit, it was only 150 feet away from the nearest property. And so to have a commercial operation with specifically authorized to do this when it's 150 feet away and a non-commercial recreational facility that's for apartment residents that is over 800 feet away from any existing neighborhood, we did not feel was very fair. Because of the desire to have that, that is kind of why we are here today. And the last thing I do want to point out is there already is a rule in place to restrict this exact type of use. So if there is any concern, we do have a noise ordinance that deals with this exact use, the amplification of music across property lines. So any further restriction, we just don't see any justification. In talking to the staff, the kind of concern was the reason why this is being put forward was out of an abundance of caution. I don't believe that that is the kind of standard that we need to set when we are trying to restrict a property. There simply is no justification to have this restriction when every pool in town, even the pool earlier today, was approved without this type of music restriction. We're happy to basically rename the outdoor entertainment pavilion as simply a pergola to get out of the sun. but anything that we can do to alleviate what we think is just not a necessary condition we certainly would love to do. I do want to point out that specifically this is a non-commercial facility. So, you know, that's the permit that we are asking. There would be no way to have any type of ticketed event. There would be no way to have some type of large-scale concert because by its very definition of the use, This is a non-commercial recreational use for amenities of that apartment complex. That is it. It is not open large scale to the public or anything like that. I'm happy to answer any questions, but you see why we're here? Well, before we have questions for Mr. Nicholson, I'd like to hear the staff's take. I wanted to ask Mr. Nichols if he had discussions with staff. We did. the discussions at first the last month the original kind of recommendation from planning staff was no music whatsoever and that just then changed to amplification of live music we still would like to have the ability to have a guy and a guitar and have a little amp there if necessary and if other pools in similar situations we're getting this type of treatment I very much would understand but it feels like this is being kind of isolated and without justification because there is no existing residential remotely in the area a guy with an amplified guitar yes mr chair i would like to hear from staff thank you sir take a seat and we'll sure you'll be back absolutely Autumn? All right. In the words of Mr. Glover, what say you? I think as Mr. Nicholson said, this condition was placed sort of out of an abundance of caution. With the labeling on the site plan as an entertainment pavilion, that's something that is not typically seen on this type of establishment. many times the the ball homes pools that mr. Nicholson referred to are considered as an accessory use because they're on the same property as the apartments the difference here that makes this a conditional use is that is on a separate parcel across the street so that is what enables us to place conditions on this use also the the adjacency to a body of water where sound could carry over was a concern that said we're agreeable to make changes to the condition and if that is how the board wants to go forward. May I ask then, what's the difference between live music and recorded music? Because, I mean, to me there's no difference because they're both amplified and both can be exactly the same in terms of acoustics. I guess the level of amplification would be the The determining factor? The Lansdowne Club, as an example, has a condition that refers to limited amplification. That's a little bit vague, but… Mr. Marks? Since there's no objectors here, and fine-tuning the condition with noise issues can be very difficult. If you're more comfortable just deleting condition number two, we're fine with that. If I could ask Mr. Nicholson, if you could give, can we go back to this? Can you give me the idea that sound projects across water, I think is correct. can you give me what buffer there is between the water and this this site so while I do understand that sound can travel across the water we are conditionally restricted to not touch any trees for 50 feet right along this water side so for like a 50-foot buffer all the way around this pool we are not allowed to touch a tree that is there I also have to point out that the polo club is right here it is a pool that has live music often right on the water so it is a use that already is in the very area itself the good news also is there are similar buffers all the way around here and also on the Denton farm which I had talked earlier and with the Denton farm it is a conditional zoning restriction this is actually a hard parcel line that kentucky american water has retained in this area so yes it does travel across music but yes we have restricted all the land around the reservoir to add any type of landscape buffer that's necessary good thank you Any additional questions for staff or the applicant? Okay, so currently we have the staff's report, which has four conditions, but it sounds like they are agreeable to delete number two. So at this point, is there any discussion from the board? Well, hearing none, then I will entertain a motion. Mr. Chair, I recommend approval of PLN BOA 19-5, the peninsula requesting a conditional use permit for a private club in order to construct a clubhouse and high-density apartment zone at 440 Squires Road, based on the recommendations of the staff and subject to the conditions except eliminating condition number two. Thank you, sir. Do I have a second? I second the motion. Ms. Whitman seconds. Any discussion on the motion? Hearing none, then I will call to a vote. Motion is approved. Good luck with the project. All right, so this brings us back to our last case of the day, which is PLM BOA 19-10, Randy and Sharon Gray. Does the applicant press come on up? And I will distribute three letters on this one. Are they in support or? We have two letters of opposition and one letter of support. Okay. Good afternoon, sir. Could you state your name for the record? Yes, Randy Gray. Mr. Gray. We do have some letters here that we need to look at, but in the meantime, the staff has recommended approval based upon one condition. And are you agreeable to abide by that condition? what is the condition sir um says the applicant shall submit as built drawings to the division of building inspection in order to obtain a fence permit in 30 days we've already bought the permit okay all right well sir um give us a couple minutes you want to have a seat we'll look at these letters um in the meantime where you i know there was a gentleman here i had brought some pictures also i don't think you have pictures of okay yeah you want you can hand those and then And then we'll look at those two in the meantime. And I know that you spoke with a gentleman outside. Were you guys able to resolve any issues or you still want to speak today? I'm not a lawyer, so I just want to make sure that I have access between the houses and my property. Okay. Well, we'll give you an opportunity to speak when we get the case going. So if you want, give us a couple minutes, and then we'll have you up here. Thank you. Amen. Thank you. Just like you can't have a son of a bitch. You're a great girl. She's doing a little bit good, but... She's a bitch. I love her. Thank you. All right. Mr. Grape, you come up here for a second. Oh, come on up to me. Yeah, I'm going to hand you these back. It may behoove you to, if you give these to the gentleman, He can put them up on the screen. You can explain what some of these photos are. Those photos are neighborhoods. Those are pictures of my neighbors up and down the block. Okay. With all the first five pictures are mine. The new stuff, yes, all that. Yeah, and the rest of them are where my neighbors already have their fences up to the side of their houses. It's like that all in my neighborhood. It's nothing. Really, it's changed except for six people. Okay. Well, here's what I'll do is you need to hand you these back. If you want to show us any while you talk, give them to the audiovisual guy. Show them the specific ones. But you'll need to leave those with staff to be put in the record. Okay. You need to let us know which ones to show when you come to your prison. Okay. Are you ready for my now? Okay. Well, I had the ones in order the way I had them. We apologize. We were, we looked through them, so we got them out of order. I don't mind. I appreciate you looking through them. Thank you. Okay. These first five are of my property on both sides, what I did different. On this particular picture, I enclosed my air conditioning units, and also that's my master bathroom window right there, so people could really get up on those and look in that window. So I really just made it more secure on that one side, and plus I made it more, you know, it looks a lot nicer from the street because you're not looking at those units. that's why I did that. My fence already came up the side of my yard on that side of my house already but I extended it up that much more just to enclose those. And that's another picture of it after I did it from the front of the house where you can't see those units but on that side and plus they enclosed that window which I thought that was, you know, so people don't have access to my house. Plus, the fence, if you see the guys next to me, his fence was already up the side, and so was mine on that side of my house. So I hadn't realized that I had did anything that I wasn't supposed to do there. Go ahead. This is showing you my crawl space on the other side of my house and all the wiring and stuff, the utilities, I enclosed that hole right there on that side of the house so that, you know, nobody would have access to my crawl space other than us. So I moved it from one, go ahead, to the next one. So it was at the backside of this concrete pad where my gate was, and I just moved it up so I could enclose that stuff. I had, you know, I was still on my property line. I had no intent to, you know, bother anyone with what I did there except for just make my house safer. That's really, and more appealing, which it did both of those things. And that shows, you know, I was told by Jonathan and some of the people, the inspectors, that you know access was possibly a problem as far as you know fire departments police utility companies burst lines or anything like that so as you can see really my access never changed any it's the same access as it was before the gate was at the back side of that that cement now so at the front side of the cement so really access nothing ever changed here it's the same access as it was. Okay. Is that all of those? These are just And then I took, you know, I went through my neighborhood taking pictures of people's fences that are on their property lines that come up the side of their houses, and there's several in my neighborhood, I mean a lot of them, I mean probably 25% or more is you know they all come up the side of their houses just like I did there so and plus my access hadn't changed I just I just made my property look a whole lot better so if you guys want to charge me more property taxes this year that'll be fine but they're all the same just different houses different ones of those So, you know, I'd appreciate it if you would consider my variance. Thank you, sir. And then I'll let you, sir, if you want to come up. And you don't need to be a lawyer. We don't bite, don't worry. Oh, and Mr. Gray, real quickly, I don't believe either one of you were sworn in prior. So if you could raise your hands. You too. And then, Mr. Gray, you're going to have a second one. Do you swear to tell the, swear or affirm, tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth? Thank you, gentlemen. Mr. Gray, do you swear and affirm that all the testimony you get today has been truthful so far? Yes. Thank you, sir. Come on up. I guess I'm really here because I didn't. If you just say your name for the record. Okay. Rob Carlisle. Mr. Carlisle, I think we got a letter. Was one of the letters from? From my wife, yes. Okay. Yeah, okay. Yeah. We didn't know if we were going to be able to make it or not, so we wanted to make sure we had some type of. So as it stated in the letter, the main concern was just being able to have access down in between the houses where the walkway was. We've lived there for 19 years, and there's been some disputes between the two families, and I found out what one of the problems was in the conversation outside, which I can easily fix. It's long clippings on the pathway. but I didn't know exactly what this meant by moving the variance and all this other stuff and I've always so I'm not educated when it comes to you know where the property lines is I thought there was a property line and there were supposed to be so many feet in between that so I thought it would be and it's always has been a common walkway and I just didn't want to heat where I can't get back there if I want to build a new deck we're going to be putting a new fence in this summer and some other things too so I just want to make sure that I still have access because on the other side of my house it is smaller than that side and there's not enough room to put a gate to be able to allow those types of things in the house back there what kind of distance is there between your house and the property line it's like you and this and the grays then the grays it's it's probably four feet I assume this is a picture you're showing us. This is the walkway coming out of their gate. So his house is on the left. Mine is on the right. My air conditioning units are on the right side. And you can see a little bit of the concrete pad that's up from that where my air conditioning is. So when we purchased the house, our house was one of the first houses built in the neighborhood. and the fence that was there, ours was the first fence that went up. A lot of people tied onto the side of our fence. Randy actually took his tied part of it down and re-put a new post in. I don't dispute the fence. I just want to make sure so where that pole is there now, I'm going to have to move that flower bit, you know, move that back and stuff like that. I don't mind doing that, but I just want to make sure that we have an agreement here that he understands that is my walkway to get to my backyard always has been uh yeah we can't we don't resolve property okay disputes that's why i said i didn't i just came in down here to see what this was about really and what we need to do when you say uh when you say you your concern your main concern is access uh to i guess your backyard or your side yard You're not talking about access over the graze property. You're just talking about access over your property from front to back. Is that right? Correct. Okay. It's really what we're, if we grant this application, the fence can stay. And if we deny it, he's got to take the fence down. And that's really the only thing that we're dealing with today. day um so um i guess the question is is the fence is existing there are you saying that with the fence being there you won't you won't be able to access your yard with right now i'm going to have to move some things around and do some other things to access my yard correct we both actually have like on the sides there's rock that come out i'm gonna have to actually move mine too where i changed it and shortened it a little bit, but he has access to his yard. But you're talking about moving a flower bed, not moving permanent structures? Okay. Correct. Yes. All right. So Mr. Keller, how much, say again, how much room between your house, the wall of your house, and his fence? Probably four, four and a half feet. Okay. That's what I thought you said. Yeah. I have a question for Mr. Gray, if you could. I admit in the letters they reference the HOA a couple of times. So did you receive approval from the HOA? Yes, ma'am. Did you go through that process? Yes, ma'am. We did that prior to. And they approved for the fence to be moved? We sent them diagrams of the whole thing and they did approve that. I'd like to ask the staff if I might, is this a fairly common in that neighborhood that the fences are actually on the line? It is. It appeared to be. We looked at a lot of aerial photos of the neighborhood, and it appeared that there were a number of houses with similar situations. Any additional comments or questions from the board? Well, hearing none, then I will entertain a motion. Mr. Chair, I move we approve PLN BOA 19-10, Randy and Sharon Gray's request for variances to reduce the required side yard setbacks from 3 feet to 0 feet in order to allow a fence to remain as constructed within the required side yard between the principal structure and the side property lines in a planned neighborhood residential R3 zone at 916 Quarter Horse Court for the reasons recommended for the reasons reported by staff for the testimony based on the testimony we've heard today and subject to the one condition contained in the staff case report. Thank you. Do I have a second that was mr. Clark was that mr. Clark again well she keeps wanting to call mr. Clark mr. Needham I mean you guys look just alike so I see the confusion Well, while we're working on the system, any discussion or comments to the motion? We're hearing that I'll call a vote once it pulls up. A motion carries and the application has been approved. Thank you, gentlemen. So that ends our public hearings for the day. I'm presuming that we had a vote for officers last month, and since no one told me to get out of the chair, that I was reappointed the chair for this coming year. So I appreciate that, I think. Very good. Are there any items that anyone from the board wants to have addressed at this time? Any staff items to address at this time? Okay. Well, our next meeting will be April 8, 2019 at 1.30 p.m., which I believe is right after spring break. So hopefully we'll all be able to make it. since there's no further business, I'll adjourn the meeting. Thank you. Thank you.