# Board of Architectural Review - June 12, 2019 > Auto-transcribed civic record · June 12, 2019 - **Permalink**: https://meetings.lexingtonky.news/meeting/4772 - **Source video**: https://lfucg.granicus.com/player/clip/4772?view_id=14&redirect=true - **Date**: 2019-06-12 - **Last revised**: June 12, 2019 - **Length**: 3,448 words > ⚠️ **Auto-generated content.** Audio from the official Granicus video was auto-transcribed with OpenAI's open-source Whisper large-v3-turbo model, run locally by The Lexington Times. Structured facts were extracted with GPT-4o; the narrative summary was written by Anthropic Claude. Verbatim wording may contain errors. See [methodology](https://meetings.lexingtonky.news/about/methodology) or [report a correction](mailto:editor@lexingtonky.news). --- ## Meeting Overview The Board of Architectural Review held a meeting on June 12, 2019. The meeting addressed 10 agenda items, all consisting of architectural review applications for various properties throughout the jurisdiction. The board took 10 votes during the session, with all agenda items receiving approval. No public comments were heard during this meeting. The board successfully processed a full slate of architectural review applications, demonstrating efficient handling of the community's development and renovation projects. ## Votes and Decisions The meeting included ten Certificate of Appropriateness (C.O.A.) applications, all of which were approved by voice vote. No specific vote counts or individual member votes were recorded for any of the applications. The following C.O.A. applications were approved: • **Application 10980238-d** for 328 Lafayette Avenue - Approved with standard two conditions as read into meeting minutes • **Application 08760141-g** for 141 South Hanover Avenue - Motion by Mr. Chairman, approved with standard two conditions • **Application 02510410-g** for 410 South Broadway - Motion by Mr. Chair, approved with standard two conditions and submission of corrected drawings • **Application for 248 South Hanover Avenue** - Motion by Mr. Chairman, approved with condition that any increase in height be submitted for review and standard two conditions • **Application 08760250-8** for 250 South Hanover Avenue - Motion by Mr. Chair, approved with condition that any increase in height be submitted for review and standard two conditions • **Application 05450262-e** for 262 Delmar Avenue - Motion by Mr. Chair, approved with standard two conditions • **Application for 303 Desha Road** - Approved with condition to infill with brick to match existing and standard conditions • **Application 21030338-l** for 338 Woodland Avenue - Motion by Mr. Chair, approved with standard two conditions • **Application 06510611-f** for 611 Elsmere Park - Motion by Mr. Chairman, approved with standard two conditions • **Application 02500516-f** for 516 North Broadway - Motion by Mr. Chair, approved with condition to submit final door details and standard two conditions All applications passed unanimously by voice vote. No transcript timestamps were available for the voting portions of the meeting. ## 328 Lafayette Avenue The board reviewed an application for 328 Lafayette Avenue to refresh the gravel driveway at the property. Rebecca Adams served as the key speaker during this discussion. The application involved maintenance work on the existing gravel driveway, which required board approval. During the review process, the applicant agreed to comply with the standard conditions typically imposed for such projects. The board found the application to be straightforward and approved the request to refresh the gravel driveway. No significant concerns or objections were raised during the discussion, and the matter proceeded smoothly through the approval process. The outcome was an approval for the gravel driveway refresh project at 328 Lafayette Avenue, with the applicant's agreement to adhere to standard conditions. ## 141 South Hanover Avenue The board reviewed an application for the construction of ornamental iron fence segments at 141 South Hanover Avenue. The discussion involved key speakers Robert and Mary Ann, who participated in the review of the proposed fencing project. During the meeting, the applicants presented their plans for installing ornamental iron fence segments on the property. The board examined the application details and discussed the proposed construction with the applicants. The applicants demonstrated their willingness to comply with the board's requirements by agreeing to the standard conditions typically imposed on such projects. This agreement helped facilitate the approval process and addressed any potential concerns the board may have had regarding the installation. Following the discussion and the applicants' acceptance of the standard conditions, the board approved the application for the ornamental iron fence segments at 141 South Hanover Avenue. The approval allows the property owners to proceed with their planned fencing installation in accordance with the agreed-upon conditions. ## 410 South Broadway The board reviewed an application for 410 South Broadway involving the installation of signage and construction of a guardrail at the property. Key speakers during the discussion included Jared Gabbard and Tim Doneson, who presented details about the proposed improvements to the board members. The application centered on two main components: new signage installation and guardrail construction at the South Broadway location. During the review process, the applicant demonstrated cooperation with the board's requirements and agreed to comply with standard conditions typically imposed for such projects. One notable development during the discussion was the applicant's commitment to submit corrected drawings. This suggests that the initial plans required modifications to meet the board's standards or address specific concerns that arose during the review process. The board ultimately approved the application for 410 South Broadway. The approval came after the applicant's agreement to both the standard conditions and the submission of revised drawings, indicating that any initial concerns were satisfactorily addressed through the collaborative review process. This agenda item represents a typical property improvement review where the board worked with the applicant to ensure compliance with local requirements while facilitating the proposed enhancements to the South Broadway property. ## 248 South Hanover Avenue The board reviewed an application for the installation of solar panels on the rear roof at 248 South Hanover Avenue. John Miller served as a key speaker during the discussion of this agenda item. The proposal involved mounting solar panels specifically on the rear portion of the roof at the residential property. During the review process, the applicant demonstrated willingness to comply with the board's requirements by agreeing to conditions related to the height specifications of the installation as well as standard regulatory conditions typically applied to such projects. The board's discussion focused on ensuring the solar panel installation would meet appropriate standards and guidelines. The applicant's cooperation in accepting the proposed conditions appeared to facilitate the review process and address any potential concerns regarding the project's compliance with local regulations. Following the presentation and discussion, the board approved the application for the solar panel installation at 248 South Hanover Avenue. The approval was granted with the understanding that the applicant would adhere to the agreed-upon conditions regarding height restrictions and other standard requirements for solar panel installations in the jurisdiction. ## 250 South Hanover Avenue The board reviewed an application for the installation of solar panels on the rear roof at 250 South Hanover Avenue during agenda item 5. David Jakewidth served as a key speaker during the discussion of this proposal. The application involved installing solar panels specifically on the rear portion of the building's roof. During the review process, the board established certain conditions that needed to be met for approval, including requirements related to the height of the installation and adherence to standard regulatory conditions. The applicant demonstrated cooperation with the board's requirements by agreeing to comply with all specified conditions, including the height restrictions and standard conditions set forth by the board. This agreement helped facilitate the approval process. Following the discussion and the applicant's acceptance of the proposed conditions, the board approved the solar panel installation application for 250 South Hanover Avenue. The approval allows the property owner to proceed with the installation of solar panels on the rear roof section, subject to meeting the agreed-upon height and standard regulatory requirements. ## 262 Delmar Avenue The board reviewed an application for modifications at 262 Delmar Avenue during agenda item 6. The proposed work involved changing openings and replacing siding on the property. Greg Abernathy served as the key speaker for this agenda item, presenting the application to the board for consideration. The discussion proceeded smoothly, with the applicant demonstrating willingness to comply with the board's requirements. Specifically, the applicant agreed to accept the standard conditions typically imposed for this type of work. No significant concerns or objections were raised during the review process, and the board found the proposed changes acceptable for the property. The application was approved by the board. *Note: Specific transcript timestamps are not available for this agenda item.* ## 303 Desha Road The board reviewed an application for modifications to 303 Desha Road, which involved changing openings and reconstructing the front walkway of the property. Brian Birch served as the key speaker for this agenda item, presenting the details of the proposed changes to the board members. The discussion centered on the specific alterations planned for the property's facade and entrance area. The application included plans to modify existing openings in the structure and completely reconstruct the front walkway leading to the building. During the review process, the board established certain conditions that would need to be met for approval. These conditions specifically addressed requirements for brick infill work and adherence to standard regulatory conditions typically applied to such modifications. The applicant demonstrated cooperation with the board's requirements by agreeing to comply with all the specified conditions, including both the brick infill specifications and the standard conditions outlined by the board. Following the presentation and discussion of the proposed modifications, along with the applicant's agreement to meet the established conditions, the board voted to approve the application for 303 Desha Road. The approval allows the property owner to proceed with the planned changes to the openings and front walk reconstruction, provided they adhere to the agreed-upon conditions regarding materials and construction standards. The successful resolution of this agenda item demonstrates the collaborative process between applicants and the board in ensuring that property modifications meet both the owner's needs and the community's standards for construction and design. ## 338 Woodland Avenue The board reviewed an application for 338 Woodland Avenue during agenda item 8. The proposal involved enclosing a window at the property. Sandra served as the key speaker during the discussion of this application. The board considered the request and evaluated it against applicable standards and regulations. The applicant demonstrated cooperation with the board's requirements by agreeing to accept the standard conditions typically associated with such modifications. This agreement helped facilitate the review process and addressed any regulatory concerns the board may have had regarding the window enclosure project. Following the discussion, the board approved the application for 338 Woodland Avenue. The approval allows the property owner to proceed with enclosing the window as requested, subject to the standard conditions that were agreed upon during the meeting. The straightforward nature of this agenda item, combined with the applicant's willingness to comply with standard requirements, contributed to a smooth approval process for this property modification request. ## 611 Elsmere Park The board reviewed an application for 611 Elsmere Park to enlarge an existing screened porch. George Hammock served as the key speaker presenting the proposal to the board. During the discussion, the board identified issues with the submitted drawings that required correction before approval could be granted. The applicant acknowledged these concerns and agreed to submit revised drawings that would address the board's requirements. As part of the approval process, the applicant also agreed to comply with the standard conditions typically applied to such modifications. These conditions ensure that the proposed enlargement meets local building codes and design standards. Following the presentation and discussion of the necessary corrections, the board approved the application for the screened porch enlargement at 611 Elsmere Park, contingent upon the submission of the corrected drawings and adherence to standard conditions. The approval allows the property owner to proceed with enlarging their screened porch once the revised documentation is provided and meets the board's specifications. ## 516 North Broadway The board reviewed an application for construction work at 516 North Broadway during agenda item 10. The proposed project involved constructing a rear deck, stairs, and making changes to existing openings in the building. Robert Garrison served as the key speaker for this agenda item, presenting the application details to the board. The discussion focused on the specific construction elements requested by the applicant. During the review process, the applicant agreed to submit final door details as part of their application materials. This agreement addressed the board's need for complete architectural specifications before final approval could be granted. The board also applied standard conditions to the approval, which are typical requirements for construction projects of this nature. These standard conditions likely include compliance with local building codes, proper permitting procedures, and adherence to approved construction timelines. Following the discussion and the applicant's agreement to provide the additional door details, the board approved the application for 516 North Broadway. The approval allows the applicant to proceed with constructing the rear deck, stairs, and making the proposed changes to the building's openings, subject to the standard conditions and submission of the final door specifications. The straightforward nature of this approval suggests the proposed construction work was consistent with local zoning requirements and building standards, with only minor documentation needed to complete the application process. --- ## Decisions - **10980238-d** — passed (0-0): Approve C.O.A. Application for 328 Lafayette Avenue - **08760141-g** — passed (0-0): Approve C.O.A. Application for 141 South Hanover Avenue - **02510410-g** — passed (0-0): Approve C.O.A. Application for 410 South Broadway - **Motion** — passed (0-0): Approve C.O.A. Application for 248 South Hanover Avenue - **08760250-8** — passed (0-0): Approve C.O.A. Application for 250 South Hanover Avenue - **05450262-e** — passed (0-0): Approve C.O.A. Application for 262 Delmar Avenue - **Motion** — passed (0-0): Approve C.O.A. Application for 303 Desha Road - **21030338-l** — passed (0-0): Approve C.O.A. Application for 338 Woodland Avenue - **06510611-f** — passed (0-0): Approve C.O.A. Application for 611 Elsmere Park - **02500516-f** — passed (0-0): Approve C.O.A. Application for 516 North Broadway --- ## Full transcript and we now have a total of 15 historic districts. The board, which is appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the Urban County Council, is a part of the Division of Historic Preservation. The Historic Preservation Office maintains a full-time staff to assist you with your projects. The board encourages and recommends that applicants use them as a resource. The Historic Preservation Office is located at 101 East Vine Street, Room 220. It is our procedure to consider applications in the order in which they're listed in our agenda. In each case, we'll have a presentation by the staff and we'll hear any additional comments from the applicant. The board will then ask questions or make comments regarding the application and then hear comments from any other interested parties. The chair will then ask the board members to enter a motion. If you wish to address the board, please come to the microphone and state your name and address for the public record. We also ask that you write your name on the sign-in sheet by the door so that the information can be recorded correctly. I would like to note the following staff approvals before we begin our review of the applications. There are certain items the staff can approve, eliminating the necessity for all applicants to appear before the board. There are a total of 27 approved applications noted on today's agenda. They are as follows. In the Ashland Park Histoire District at 1014 Fontaine Road, install Rubbermaid Shud. in the South Ashland Central Avenue Historic District at 244 South Ashland Avenue, remove, replace pin oak tree. At 707 Central Avenue, renovate structure. At 710 Central Avenue, install and replace fencing. Again, at 710 Central Avenue, install patio. In the Ellsworth Historic District at 222 Clay Avenue, restore curbing. 419 East High Street, repaved driveway parking area. 136 Kentucky Avenue renovate chimneys, 141 Old Lafayette Avenue replace roof, 311 Lafayette Avenue renovate structure, 381 Oldham Avenue replace fence, 385 Oldham Avenue replace fence, 325 Transylvania Park install patio, 347 Transylvania Park renovate porch. In the Belcourt Historic District at 146 East Belcourt, replace fencing and paving. 216 East Belcourt, renovate chimneys. 257 Belcourt, restructure. 260 Belcourt, repair rear landing and stairs. In the Constitution Historic District at 114 Constitution Street, repair Belcourt door. At 137 Constitution Street, repair dead tree. In the South Hill Historic District at 102 West High Street, renovate storefront, 211 West Maxwell Street, reroute structure, 253 South Limestone and renovate structure and site, and 275 South Limestone, 225 restore windows. In the western suburbs historic district at 736 West Short Street, installed chimney caps. At 706 West Maxwell Street in the Woodward Heights historic district, repair gutters. And finally, at 320 Marino Street, renovate structure. We will now turn to our first application, that being at 328 Lafayette Avenue. The scope of work is refresh the gravel driveway. Is the applicant here? Come on. I caught your cough. Thank you. Sorry about that. If you state your name for the record, please. Rebecca Adams. Okay. The staff has reviewed your application, and they recommend approval with what I've been referring to as the standard conditions, and they are as follows. I'll read them once into the record. Once reviewed by the other LFUCG divisions, resubmitting changes to staff or board for review and approval prior to start of work, And secondly, if any changes are made that alter the information submitted, resubmit the changes to staff for review and approval prior to start of work. Are you in agreement with those? Yes, sir. Okay, any questions or comments? Any questions or comments from the audience? If not, the Chair is ready for a motion. Chair, Chair, I move to approve the COA application for case number 10980238-D at 328 Lafayette Avenue with the standard two conditions as read into the meeting minutes. Okay. Is there a second? Second. Any further discussion on the motion? If not, the chair will call the question. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Motion passes and your certificate of appropriateness is approved as conditioned. Thank you ma'am. All right turning now to 141 South Avenue, I can't talk today, South Hanover Avenue. Scope of work is construct ornamental iron fence segments at boundary corners and the applicants on this way. Sure. It's Robert and Marianne Nolan. All right Mr. Nolan. The staff has reviewed your application. They have recommended approval, I believe, subject to the standard conditions. Are you in agreement with them? Yes. All right. Any questions or comments from the board members? Any questions or comments from the audience? I believe the chair is ready for a motion then. Mr. Chairman, I move to approve the application for a certificate of appropriateness on case number 08760141-G at 141 South Hanover Avenue. with the two standard conditions. Okay. Do I have a second? I second. All right. Any further discussion on the motion? Chair calls the question. All those in favor of the motion say aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed, nay. Motion passes, and the certificate of appropriateness is approved as condition. Thank you. Thank you. Got it. All right. Turning now to case number three at 410 South Broadway in the South Hill Historic District. Scope of work is install signing and construct card way. Come on. Good afternoon. Good afternoon, sir. How to state your name for the record, please. Jared Gabbard. Okay, Mr. Gabbard. The staff has reviewed your application and I believe, yes, they have approved it subject to the standard conditions. Are you in agreement with those conditions? I am. All right. Any questions or comments from the board members? I have one really picky comment because these drawings become part of the record. Okay. And it is on sheet A4. There's a note that says, it's not a big deal, that says poplar wood siding and it points to the sidewalk. If we could get that corrected. So it actually points to the poplar wood siding. And sir, would you state your name please? Hi, I'm Tim Dobson. Okay. I think maybe that was an old PDF that I sent her and I'd resend her to her. Can I submit these to you now or do you need to? Give them to you. As long as the staff has the most current copy. I sent an email and I think I'd send it back to Amelia. Excellent, just so we have it accurate, thank you. This is why the board has a reputation for eagle eyes. Should you need anything else, we're happy to provide it. That's it. happy to send those in pdf back to you guys if that would be helpful no so long as it's a record we're fine okay great anything else then that's it any comments or questions from the audience any questions or comments from the audience if not the chair is ready for a motion mr chair i move to approve the coa application for case number 02510410-g at 410 South Broadway with standard two conditions. Do I have a second? Second. Any further discussion on the motion? Along with the submitted, the correct drawings. The chair will call the question. All those in favor of the motion say aye. Aye. Opposed, nay. All right, the motion passes and the certificate of appropriateness is approved, as conditioned. Thank you so much. Thank you all so much. Have a great evening. All right, you too. okay turning now to attachment number four 248 south hanover avenue scope of work is install solar panels on the rear roof applicant here my name is john winn miller all right mr miller the staff has reviewed your application they have in addition to the standard two conditions one condition of some substance and i'll read it into the record that any increase in height shall be submitted to staff or review an approval prior to the start of work. Are you in agreement with that condition? Yes. All right any questions or comments from the board members? Any questions or comments from the audience? If not then the chair is ready for a motion. Mr. Chairman I move to approve the application for a certificate of appropriateness for case number 08760248-E at 248 South Hanover Avenue with the following conditions. Number one, that any increase in height shall be submitted to staff for review and approval prior to the start of work, as well as number two and three being our standard conditions. All right. Do I have a second? Second. Okay. Any further discussion on the motion? If not, the chair will call the question. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed nay. All right. The motion has passed. The COA is approved. As condition. thank you thank you mr miller all right and we have actually neighbors having solar panels uh coming up at 250 south hanover avenue install solar panels on the rear roof and i believe mr david jake with jacob okay and i believe it has the same conditions that we had discussed before i read the one of substance excuse me any increase in height shall be submitted to staff for review and approval prior to the start of work are we in agreement with that i am all right any questions or comments from the board members i don't questions or comments from the audience if not then the chair will ask for a motion mr chair i move to approve the coa application for case number 08760250-8 at 250 south hanover avenue with um the following condition an increase in height shall be submitted to staff for review and approval prior to the start of work plus the standard two conditions all right do you have a second second any further discussion on the motion if not then the chair will call the question all those in favor of the motion say aye aye aye opposed nay the motion has passed the COA has approved its condition. Thank you sir. Thank you. Alright. Turning now to attachment number 7, 303 Deshaies Road scope of work change openings reconstruct front walk. Number 6 Del Mar Avenue. I apologize. I was going too quickly. Excuse me. At 262 Del Mar Avenue scope of work change openings replace siding. Any applicants before me, state your name for the record, please. Greg Abernathy. All right. I believe the staff has reviewed your application and recommends approval subject to the standard two conditions. Are you in agreement with them? I am. All right. Any questions or comments from the staff and the board members? I don't think so. Any questions or comments from the audience? If not, then the chair will ask for a motion. I'm ready for the motion. Go ahead. Don't fight among yourselves. Mr. Chair, I move to approve the COA application for case number 05450262-E at 262 Delmar Avenue with the standard two conditions. All right. Do I have a second? Second. Any further discussion on the motion? If not, then the Chair will call the question. All those in favor of the motion say aye. Aye. Opposed, nay. Motion passes and the certificate of appropriateness is approved as conditioned. Thank you very much. Thank you, sir. I appreciate it. Okay, turning now. No problem. All right, I'm turning now to 303 Deshaies Road. Scope of work is change openings, reconstruct the front walk. If you'll state your name for the record, please. Brian Burch, 303 to Shea. How are you today? Very good, thank you. All right, the staff has reviewed your application. They recommend approval subject to what I've been calling the standard conditions plus a condition that's substantive. And that is, that's the first condition, infill the window opening with brick to match the existing brick set back from the existing brick face two to six inches and retain the window seals. agreement with that condition yes all right do you have any questions from the board members any questions or comments from the audience if not then the chair will ask for i'm ready for a motion mr chairman i move to approve the application for a certificate of appropriateness on case number 05550303-C at 303 Deshay Road with the following conditions. Number one, infill the window opening with brick to match the existing brick set back from the existing brick face two to six inches and retain the window sills as well as conditions two and three being our standard conditions. okay do i have a second i second all right uh any further discussion on the motion if not the chair will call the question all those in favor say aye aye opposed nay motion passes then the certificate of appropriateness is approved as conditioned thank you thank you sir all right turning now to attachment number eight which is 338 woodland avenue scope of work is in closed window and ma'am if you'll state your name for the record please Sandra Aranava all right I believe the staff has recommended approval of your application subject to why I've been referring to is the standard two conditions have you read them yes and are you in agreement with them all right do I have any questions or comments from the staff board members Any questions or comments from the audience? If not, then the Chair is ready for a motion. Mr. Chair, I move to approve case number 21030338-L at 338 Woodland Avenue with the standard two conditions. All right. Do I have a second? Second. Any further comments or discussion about the motion? Not then. The chair calls the motion. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed, nay. Motion passes and your application is approved as conditioned. Thank you. Okay, turning now to attachment number nine, which is 611 Ellesmere Park. Scope of work is to enlarge the screen porch. Is the applicant here? george hammock all right mr hammock uh the staff has reviewed your application and has recommended approval subject to what i call the standard conditions are you agreeing with them yes sir all right any questions or comments from the board members i just have a couple drawing questions once again just trying to always make sure we have the most accurate thing in the response um so on the um i noticed that you're moving the door adding a door on the wall that's to remain and as the wall that's being pushed out to the edge of the deck will be without a door that is correct okay so on the drawing that shows the proposed first floor plan there is a little section of the existing i assume it's the existing deck that still shows on the plan doesn't show on the elevations it's a funky little piece that stands on the edge is that going to remain no that that will that will the existing uh screened in deck uh line will extend on through and the doorway will uh move to one panel off of the existing house so it's in line with the uh hallway door Do the drawings need to be corrected then? The door is shown correctly. It's not included in the notation, but it's very clear in the drawing. I think it was more about the piece of the existing deck. It's got a funky kind of stair-step octagon concept. It does. And we are squaring that off just for the continuity of the screened-in board. So is funky an architectural term that I'm not familiar with? I didn't want to get too technical with you. So I'm assuming then that the deck, the new deck, let me look at this other drawing, yeah. Because the, I'm sorry, the new screen and porch does not go all the way to the corner. It steps off that corner. That's correct. The roof line does not surpass the edge of the house. so that small piece of deck that um is um that is shown to remain will actually be removed that's correct okay thank you that's the clarification i needed and i'll say do we need to have the applicant submit corrected drawings up to the staff whether mr kerb i believe that would be necessary thank you okay uh that falls within if there are changes or alterations you'll submit to the staff this is going to be a change that you're making to your plans okay and just read some myths that way the plans will match up yes your staff review with what you're doing i understand so it's for your own protection i understand okay i have a question real quick sure you're in the kitchen you're demolishing an infill on your plan it says demolish infill and door opening it looks like you're installing a new door in that old opening that's in the old opening and then well I guess right now the opening has been infilled as it exists correct and then you'll be putting a new door taking away the infill and putting a new door in on the screened-in porch it's inside the screen in porch but it's on the actual structure of the house there there was a door from the exterior still visible on the interior it was blocked off okay we've removed the interior from it so that door while it's it's going to become functional it'll it's the door that existed already and you'll continue to use it that's correct okay that's correct it was just screwed off and then covered up from the outside it didn't change it's exactly the same from the inside it's just going to simply become functional. Okay well I only brought it up because if it was a new door we'd want to talk about it. I understand. Yes sir. Thanks. Any other questions or comments from the board members? Any questions or comments from the audience? If not then the chair is ready for a motion. Mr. Chairman, I move to approve the application for a certificate of appropriateness for case number 06510611-F at 611 Ellesmere Park with the two standard conditions. All right. Do I have a second? Second. Any further discussion or comments about the application or motion? All right. Then the Chair will call the question. All those in favor of the motion say aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed? Nay. Motion passes and the certificate appropriateness is approved, sir. Thank you, Chair. Thank you so much. Excuse me. Could you help me spell your name? All right. Turning to our last attachment, number 10, at 516 North Broadway in the north side historic district, scope of work is construct rear deck, stairs, and change openings. Is the applicant here? Yes. All right. Robert Garrison. All right, Mr. Garrison. Staff has reviewed your application, and I believe they have approved it. Subject to the standard two conditions and one other, that first condition being that you submit the final door details and specifications for staff for review and approval prior to the issuance of the COA. Are you in agreement with that? Yes. As well as the two standard conditions? Yes. All right. Any questions or comments from the board members? Anything? I have a very dwindled audience at this point. Do I have any questions or comments from the audience? If not, then the Chair is ready for a motion. Mr. Chair, I move to approve the COA application for case number 02500516-F at 516 North Broadway with the following conditions. number one being submit final door details and specifications to staff for review and approval prior to the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness and the two standard conditions okay do I have a second second all right any further discussion on the motion if not then the chair will call the question all those in favor of the motion say aye aye opposed nay motion passes and the coa as conditioned is approved thank you sir thank you all All right. I believe there's no other action pending before the board. I have no minutes at this point. Okay. Then I believe the chair is ready for a motion to adjourn. So moved. Do you have a second? Second. We stand adjourned at 530. Thank you so much. Thank you, Josh. You're welcome. I could walk on what I would do Believe in me My love is true My love is so true Do I have to walk, walk, walk the world for you If I were to walk, if I were to walk