We now have a quorum, and it is 3.30, and I'm going to call the meeting to order. We do have a couple of announcements. Nick Carter has moved up from his extension office position to work full-time in the Ag Department at UK. His new replacement will be Bo Neal at the extension office, but the mayor's office has not filled in all the paperwork for Bo yet, so Nick, of course, is excused and Bo is not formally with us yet, but I just wanted you to know that Bo will be here in the future. And Zach is excused today because Natalie's grandmother died on Monday and the funeral is today, and Elizabeth Jensen, and I believe those are all excused absences, and we haven't heard from anyone else. I haven't. Have you? No. All right. When everybody has a minute, I would like to know if everyone has looked at the minutes and had a chance to review those, and if yes, the chair will entertain a motion. Motion has been made by Council Member Massotti, seconded by Margaret Graves. Are there any additions, changes, comments? If not, all in favor, please signify by saying aye and try to vote. Aye. Second, Margaret. Margaret is the second. We don't have a screen. I don't have a screen. Do you have one? Not that I can show you. Well, that's okay. All in favor? Aye. Any opposition? Great. I'm going to try to move this right along quickly today. We have a couple of requests from our PDR property easement holders, and we're going to go into closed session, and I really encourage everyone to stay to be here so we have enough definitely for a quorum for vote because our new appraisals are all back, and Beth will be sharing those with us during the closed session. Let me make one comment before we do that, and that is we had a couple of requests from you all when the appraisals came out. Could they have a copy of the appraisals? Our general policy has always been to not discuss these or pass them out to anyone. I personally do not even have a copy. Beth has our only copies because we don't give those to you or anyone else until after we've had a chance to discuss those in closed session to decide if we're going to make offers or not. So for those of you who requested don't take that personally, we don't give them to anybody. All right. Unfinished business. Our conservation easement program update, Beth. So with NRCS, the four farms that we closed this summer, we have received the reimbursement from them. That was for approximately $660,000, and that was direct deposited back into the city's accounts on October 2nd, and that concludes all of the money we will be, that we need from the closings this year. So that is taken care of, and also the local staff, and I think across the country, the NRCS offices are going to receive some training the week of December 9th on the new farm bill, and we'll have more information for us, and then we should be able to provide an update for you all either at our December or January meeting about some of the changes in the farm bill. And I'll add to that, we've already commented, but I'll tell you for sure, there is a new easement template coming for our easements from this farm bill. I've talked to our NRCS partners, and they assured me there are not a lot of changes like there were in the 2014, so it should not take very long. That's going, I've already spoken to Margaret, that's going into her committee to look at, and copies are going to Tracy and Dede Delaney and John Watts, who both worked on that last time formalizing the 2014 easement. So they will be looking at that, and we'll be bringing that to you. The NRCS, the appraisals that the appraiser has right now, will require that new template. So we'll need to rush that along to make sure we have it ready in time for those closings. Internal audit, Beth. Okay. So the, our audit was issued in October of last year. One year later, they do what's called in the city government a MAPR, which stands for Management Action Plan Progress Report. That is going to be issued any day now. Gloria and Sally Hamilton and I met with the internal audit director, Bruce Sali, last week, and he gave us a draft of that. It's very good. It shows all of the work we've been doing and all these committees have been doing, and there are only a few items left, and they're all in committees. And so we have a space on that where we respond, and we have done that, and Sally has concurred and we've sent that on. So that will be sent out to the mayor and the council, and we expect that to be out any day now, and we will forward it to you all. And that is what we are scheduled on November 12th to go to the council's planning and public safety committee that is chaired by Councilwoman Massotti. And that is where, so we expect that report to come out before then, which will be great. And we'll make our report brief and should answer a lot of questions. So we're excited for it to come out because the day that Gloria and Sally and I met, we all agreed it's really good and shows how much work is going on and how involved the board is in these committees. So I think it will all be very positive. So we will send that out electronically to you all when it's published. Any questions about either of those items on your agenda? If not, we'll move right along to our new business items. We have had requests, and Beth has forwarded those to you in your packets. Again, I will encourage you all to please download those ahead so you have an opportunity. Beth goes to a good bit of trouble to put that information together and make sure it goes out on Friday so you all have the weekend before this meeting and several days to review these in case you have any questions. So hopefully you've had an opportunity to look over those easements. And I know that the balls are here, and you may be the architect for the other people. Are you? Good. Okay. So you're up first. I'm going to let Beth explain that, and then you can answer any questions they might have. Right. Okay. So this is Paul Lee, who is the architect for the Aranis that own the farm on 4635 Mount Hoard Pike. And that's in your packet. Yes. And if you look at the maps I gave you, in blue up at the top where it says 6-2004, that is the farm we are discussing right now. It's on Mount Hoard, and it is 76 acres. It's a horse farm that was placed in PDR in 2005 by Frank and Rita Penn, and the Aranis purchased it in 2005. It is a federal easement, but it does not have any protected structures or an impervious surface limit in it. And it does have two tenant houses. One is 1,248 square feet, and the other is 624 square feet. The reason that one only has two tenant houses is because it was partially subdivided, and Mr. and Ms. Penn wanted to have a smaller track with their house for someday when they were ready to sell the rest of the farm. And so what the Aranis are requesting now is a primary residence with 4,912 square feet of living area, 816 square foot garage, two front porches equaling 405 square feet, and a 500 square foot covered deck. The total square footage is 6,633 square feet, and the footprint is 130 by 52. They are not requesting any paving. The building plans are attached. It is a permitted use, Section 5 in the reserved rights of their easement, and Item C provides the landowner the right to construct or maintain one primary single-family detached dwelling. The other information is that the Aranis purchased this in March of 2015 and are ready to build a home so that they can live on the farm. And as indicated on the attached map, all of the construction will be at the rear of the farm so it will not impact the scenic viewshed and tree-lined roads that are protected in the easement. The staff recommendation is approval contingent on the approval of the Division of Building Inspection. I did speak with Building Inspection today, and both this request and the next one we're going to hear from the Balls are ready to be approved by Building Inspection. They are only waiting on PDR and on the Rural Land Management Board. The conservation recommendation, Charlie Farmer reviewed both of these and is supportive of the locations that they are building. He is okay with that. Down below I have the entire paragraph of the easement language I cited above. And then on the next page, this is the information from the PVA showing the two current residents and their square footage. Next is an aerial photograph of the property just so you all can see it as a whole. This was not provided by them. They have one showing the drawing. This is just giving you all an idea of the farm as a whole and what's around it. The next one was submitted by Mr. Lee, and it shows how the farm will be, or the house at the back there in blue, and you can see Mount Horb there in the front and how that's going to be in the back with some of the other buildings. And then Mr. Lee provided a drawing of the front of the house and the elevation as well as the rear. And that is all for the staff report, and if you all have any questions, I'm sure he or I will be happy to answer them. Have you all had a chance to look through that? I'll wait just a minute in case you do have questions of their architect or of Beth. Sorry, is the reason that you're not requesting any impervious surfaces because you're going to use existing farm roads? Most of it will be existing, but we do have a little bit of new as well. I think it's demonstrated in the bottom right-hand corner of the site plan as to how much is new. Oh, okay, a concrete sidewalk, okay, and you have the gravel drive, okay, let me get this. Yes, ma'am, yes, the drive, the gravel drive will go straight to the garage. That's before it was required by the feds. All right, okay, I'll let you describe it, and we'll let him get it up for them. They're trying to place it on the overhead, so he can point out and you can see. Those of you here have one in your packet, but folks who are watching this cannot. It's essentially going to be the sidewalk in front, and I'll let him, once you see it. He said it is going to be gravel road, and the NRCS does not consider gravel impervious. And you might note also, Beth, I think you said at the start, but this was an easement that before required that 2%, so this did not have an impervious limit. Yes, the impervious surface lane did not, it was not, did not ease in 2007. So we have the existing gravel road that, of course, starts from Mount Horeb and comes all the way to this barn, and the additional gravel will be from the barn and the loop, and also the dog leg to the garage. So all of that will be gravel. The sidewalk will be concrete, and there's, from the gravel drive, this is for visitors to stop in, and they have a little office entrance here, so that little section there is about 580 square feet of concrete for sidewalk. Thank you for the clarification. Any of the board members have any other questions? Yes, Jennifer. Can you tell me what kind of operation this is? The Iranis have show horses. They have quite a few in the barns right now, and they have a secondary farm, I believe, in Florida, so they have a lot of show horses. Thank you. Robert. The second tenant house that is just west of the proposed residence, how will access be to that? The house, it looks like, is going on the existing driveway. I can show you those two existing homes, if they could pull that back up. So the first one, the larger one, is right up here at the beginning, and then the second one, it's only 600 square feet, and it's right there. It's very tiny. It's like two rooms. So the structure on the bottom left below the proposed house is a barn? Oh, I'm sorry. This structure has already been demolished and gone. It no longer exists. Okay. Thank you. Anybody else? Thank you. The chair will entertain a motion on this. I'll move to approve the request on the agreement in D.C. for one farm for housing and infrastructure, Farm 6, 2004. That motion has been made by Margaret Graves. Is there a second? Second. Two seconds. Coordination there, Phil Myers and Robert James. Third. All in favor, let's see if you can. There you go. She's learning. She's learning, too. Okay. Now you can vote. Let's see. And Jennifer's up there, but she doesn't get to vote in this. Two of our partners are NRCS and our extension agent Jennifer are non-voting members. So all right. That passes unanimously. Thank you. Thank you, everyone. And Beth will be sending a letter to them letting them know this. I'll send it to you by email, too, so you can have it. Okay. Thank you so much. You're welcome. Thank you. All right. So our next one, if you'll flip to the next page in your packets, this is the farm owned by Kelly and David Ball, who are here in the audience today. And this is farm 27-2002. That is at 5644, 5645, and 5695 Sulphur Well Road. It is 86 acres. It is a horse farm. The Balls bought it in October of 2017. The date of the easement was October 2003, and Elizabeth and Herman Playforth put it into PDR. It is a federal easement that does not have an impervious surface limit in it. There are no protected structures, but there is a cemetery that is protected, and the Balls are well aware of that and know where it is and are not building near that. And there is one tenant house that was built in 1930 and a modular home on that. They will remove a barn in order to build the primary residence, and they notified the Board of that action in October 2017. The Balls actually came to us as soon as they bought the property in October 2017 and requested permission to build a primary residence on the farm of 3,000 square feet, and it was approved by the Board. And it's in the exact location as they are still building in. The only difference is they have increased the size, and so they're coming back to us with a size increase rather than a brand-new request. So the new size that they would like to do is a ranch-style house with 4,272 square feet on the first floor, a 575-square-foot basement, a 733-square-foot garage, and a 623-square-foot bonus playroom above the garage. The total square footage will be 6,203, and they will be able to tell us the footprint of the new structure. They are not requesting any paving right now, and we do have the building map attached in your packets. This is a permitted use. This easement has the exact same language as the Arani's, so it provides the landowner the right to construct or maintain one primary single-family detached dwelling. And Section K also allows landowners to remove barns, so that applies to the barn they are removing that's right by their building location. And they purchased the farm in 2017 and have also since then come to us and obtained permission to build a riding arena. Their daughter is an international, I believe, or national for sure, very accomplished inventor, and that is one of the reasons that they are here in Lexington. Yes, so the staff recommendation is approval contingent on the approval of the Division of Building Inspection. I did again speak with them today, and they are ready to approve just waiting on this board's approval. And Charlie Farmer is still supportive of this just as he was in 2017. And the language from the easement, the entire paragraph is below, and also on the next page. So you have the language that allows landowners to remove and rebuild farm equipment. And that's one. Some of you who own farms probably know this. Some others may not, but it is Kentucky state law. You do not have to have building permits to build barns, running sheds, any kind of building, even riding arenas if they are not for commercial use, if they're for your personal use. So those do not require, yes, building permits. So landowners do have that right reserved. On the next page, this shows the house that was built in 1930 that's 2,192 square feet. They actually do not have the modular home on this, but it is there. And Charlie was familiar with the location. And on the next page, they show that the modular home is the existing tenant house up in the left corner, and the older house is there at the bottom where it says existing tenant house near the entrance of Sulphur Well. And then the riding arena has not been built yet, but they have obtained permission from us, and the existing horse barn will stay. And then in yellow, they have their proposed main house and the barn beside that that will be torn down. And then on the next page, they provided us a survey because this farm is actually in three tracks, and so they were showing us the view of the entire parcel, plus it tells some of the neighbors that are around them. And the farm below them, Hermann, that was also owned by Hermann and Elizabeth, has since been sold, but that is also PDR. And we approved something on that one not too long ago. So that is all. Oh, yes, Gloria reminded me to show you all where this is on the large map. So it is over on your right-hand side in blue ink, Farm 27-2002 on Sulphur Well, and you can see how it's in several parcels. And so that is where they are located. And then if you all have any questions for the boss or me, we'll be happy to answer. Everybody had a chance to look at it. Thank you for coming. I've got one question. Are the two existing houses on the same track where the proposed house is to be? They are not. We went through a consolidation process last year to consolidate it all into one, and so it's all together. So there's 86 acres all together. Yeah. It was a process, but it's all finally one piece. Just out of curiosity, where is the cemetery? It's actually – It's – if you're looking at the – Maybe we can put that in the overhead. Can we hand that to them and – since you gave the other one, Beth can hand them that and they can put it on the overhead and they can – we can kind of – that will give you a location a little better. It's fenced as well, so. It's a pointer. Three, right? Yeah. It's a pointer. We call it Alexander and his brothers. We take care of the stones. The cemetery is roughly right here. Right under the writing. Okay. Yeah. Thank you. It's fenced off. There's trees around it and it's fenced off. Any other questions? Well, I've got – we've got 86 acres. Is that correct on this consolidated tract? Yes. So how many houses are we allowed on 86 acres? The policy that the building inspection – the Division of Building Inspection follows is one primary residence per parcel and one tenant house per 40 acres. So they would be within their limit. Okay. That's all my questions. Anybody else? The Chair will entertain a motion. I'll make a motion to approve the request on Farm 27-2002 on Sulphur Well Road by Kelly and David Baugh. I hope I pronounced that correctly. Perfect. Margaret's made the motion. Margaret's made the motion. Is there a second? Second. Second by Heideli Beth. And all in favor, please signify by trying to punch your button here. She's working on it. Great. Thank you. All right. Thank you very much. Thank you all very much. You're here, so now you know, but Beth will still be sending you an official letter. So you'll have that in hand. All right. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you very much. On to our committee reports. First, application and donation report, Will. Thank you. We'll submit first the minutes from our previous meeting in July. The applications and donations committee met last Tuesday. We had a very good meeting. We talked about a lot of things. The sort of main topic of discussion at our Tuesday meeting was a strategy, developing a strategy for approaching landowners and pitching PDR. We talked about several different things. I'll give you just a brief overview, sort of the difference between approaching landowners that are new to Fayette County and the type of arguments that might bode well for PDR, as well as sort of multi-generational, long-time farm owners. The other primary thing that we discussed, and I'll move to the podium to kind of show this firsthand, is the list that Beth and I have been working on of property tracts and landowners that are eligible for PDR. This might be a little small, but I hope you can sort of get the idea. We have this list broken out into two sheets. There's a sheet of 40-plus acre tracts and then tracts of 20 to 40 acres. There's actually a lot more information that's hidden to the left that has the actual family addresses of all the property owners, but this is kind of the meat of it here. So owner entity, this is what shows up on the PVA. There are a lot of sort of LLCs and incorporated entities, and then we've looked up using Secretary of State and all kinds of other resources, the individuals behind those entities, and then you have the acreage and different things of all these tracts. So what we've devised in our application committee meeting is this form to go through and identify existing relationships among the committee members and the board members to figure out who we can approach and how. Beth has gone through as well and made notes for these property owners, if they've had an experience with PDR, if they've submitted an application, if they've withdrawn an application, all kinds of very useful information. And then what we've come up with is a column for board members to indicate where they could approach a landowner if they feel comfortable doing that. Also, we've realized that maybe we don't know personally a landowner, but we might know someone who does have a very good relationship with that landowner who could act as a liaison on behalf of our program. So we're also going to try to use those relationships. And then finally, just kind of a likelihood, one being most likely, three being least likely, of getting them to submit an application. Just to provide a little context for the rest of the board. And then there's actually one more column to the right that indicates foreign ownership. So in that case, we'd be looking primarily for approaching these landowners about donations. I've sent this out to all the committee members. They're working on going through it and indicating their relationships with these landowners. We'll be sending it out to you all, to the whole board shortly, and ask your help in doing the same. Are there any questions? Will, if I may, it's a very good job to pull it all together and such. You know, critical mass is what we've been trying to build and adjoining properties and such like that. Is there any way to identify whereby we could identify properties that are where they're located and if it might be potential building for critical mass? Yeah, that's a great question. And that's actually something that we've looked at a little bit in an earlier meeting this summer. We've given the board, our committee members rather, everyone's gotten a very sort of large format map of the Fayette County properties over 40 acres. And that's sort of a GIS kind of limitation. But I think we could probably do similar sheets of sections of the county for smaller tracts. But absolutely. Put numbers down or something whereby it's not too cumbersome for you or whatever, but just something where we could identify whom is where. Absolutely. And thus help to identify relationships potentially. And I'd say, because we've already given all those maps out to the committee members, I'm sure we can do the same for the board members as well. Thanks for the question. Anyone else? All right. Thank you. I might just add that Will's committee has worked really hard on this and everybody has been showing up and thank you. We appreciate the work and the time that has gone into this. I will say that after their meeting, Beth and I went to talk to Sally Hamilton, the CAO, about mapping and using GIS for some of the maps. And that has been approved. So in coordination with what the question you just asked, we'll be able to do a whole lot of new mapping and it's all been approved. So financially we're in good shape there too. And if I may add, this is an example of these committees really working as far as I'm concerned. I mean, you're strategical, you're breaking this down. This is very helpful, I think, for identifying potential properties and, again, to be strategical. So really well done with that committee and thank you, Gloria, for initiating all that. Do you have something else, Will? No. The one thing I was going to say about this is that Will's committee also talked about that is really important in doing this, the new Farm Bill, and I talked to the NRCS folks about this and the wording is not complete yet, but in the new Farm Bill donations count as part of our match funding. So the committee is going to be looking at some of these and the ones that are less than 40 acres also do qualify and they'll be looking at those to see about donations so we can use that toward our federal match money. So when that wording is complete, they will be getting that to us. Just FYI. And I wanted to add one thing about what Will has done with this. So in addition to running his family's farm, we were able to obtain the general information from GIS that has where the farm owners and the address. But as you all will see, especially when you look at it up close, nearly probably 70% are on by LLCs. Will took his after hour time and went to the Secretary of State and looked up the members of every single LLC and added that in there. And also when you look at the full sheet, when you have access to it, you'll see that it has the farm address as well as the mailing address and several things. So he took the base of it but then really expanded it. So it's really incredible what he's done. Thank you to Will. Yes, a lot of work has gone into this. And I wanted to make sure everybody understands how much time they have spent doing this. Thank you again. As I said, Zach, for our next committee report. Zach is not here today. They have met. And Beth attached the minutes they approved from their last meeting so you know they really are doing things. And they have more meetings scheduled so he will be coming to you with an update. So you have minutes in your packets that she's just given you so you'll know what they voted on and approved. Ordinance review and long-range planning. Margaret. Apologize. Our committee has met once since I agreed to chair this committee. We were not able to meet most recently because we couldn't get enough folks there. But we have a lot of important work to do. We are reviewing the application that Will's committee worked on. There are some suggested changes to the application based on legal input that need to be made to get the application in line with the ordinance. Nothing huge but important changes that do need to be made and changes that we thought were important from a clarification point. So we will be meeting again in November. And we hope to have the revised application for the board for approval at that meeting, at our next meeting, the board's next meeting. Then we also, as Gloria mentioned, are also going to look at the template from the feds. And our goal is to get that revised and updated as quickly as possible so that we can start using that right away. So we are waiting for further information from the feds in order to do that. But that's our goal. So those are kind of our two big projects right now. Anybody have any questions? Bill? Well, you know, Beth says we've gotten some money back and we'll be talking about appraisals. So I think I'll be meeting with Beth in the coming month. But at this point I have nothing to report. I'll quickly sort of give you all a summation of some of what's been going on. Beth and I have been meeting on a regular basis. We do have a lot of papers from the NRCS that require signing, especially if we want to get this money back. And we've done all that. And we got the money. So the one thing Beth and I did that is pretty important is we attended the meeting at the Commerce Lexington, which was requested that we be there for the mayor's financial economic advisory work group. And they wanted an update about where we were and potentials for where we might get some money. We didn't make any suggestions along that line. We just answered their questions for the most part. We did attend the American Bloom Committee and give them the update and are helping with including the rural service area in that updated community profile. We do have a lot of questions coming from easement holders with housing requests. We've taken care of these and others and gotten the maps for upcoming presentations in numerous places, attending the Farm Bureau meeting and the Planning Commission. Healy was there for the presentation, our annual presentation that is required by ordinance. And that seemed to go well. And they did have some questions. We've reviewed some of the trying to coordinate the zoning ordinance with the rural land management plan and KRS and the requests that are coming not just from our property easement owners, but from the NRCS things they want us to specifically look at in this new template. So we will be pulling that together and Margaret's committee will be looking at it. I did talk with our appraisal, Paul Moore, about the status and the timeframe for the appraisals. You'll be seeing some today and he'll have some next month. And it's the next month's one that if you decide to make offers will require the new template. I did talk to our attorney who's doing the closings, and he is working on all those closings and has told us he will have those in a timely manner and did go as Bess already told you to meet with the internal auditor. And it was very positive. And the feedback was really very good and very complimentary on that. So you all working on completing those things should get pats on the back for that. And I've met with Kathy Plowman, who's here, by the way, for the record always, wanting to know how to preserve and help our rural hamlets. And they're looking at ways to try to protect them. So she and I have met about that. And that may be an issue that comes to us in some form in the future. And I've been to the education committee and all of the committees, and I'm very appreciative, again, of the work they're doing and the time. Christine, welcome. I think one thing that we're going to kind of work on, Beth and I have talked about having a meeting and coordinating with building inspection. Tracy and I talked a little bit before this meeting started about coordinating some of the things that have to do with these plans and our easements to make sure everybody is on the same page with planning and zoning and building inspection and us. Because we do get a lot of questions that when people call, they're not sure how to use the government website, and they just want questions answered without filling out the application form and getting a password and an account in order to do that. And we're going to talk about that some to see if we can't streamline that process, make it a little easier so it doesn't seem so cumbersome, because we want people to apply for easements, and we want to be as flexible and help them as much as we possibly can. So we'll be working on that. Anything else that I need to say? Okay. Beth. I believe she covered everything. We have been very busy together this last month. The only other reminder I was going to give you all is that our next board meeting is coming fast. It is just three weeks from today on November 20th because of Thanksgiving. So we will meet again on November 20th. And then our last meeting of the year is December 18th. Mark your calendar. Are there any public comments? Council Member Plowman. Good afternoon. This is on, right? Good afternoon. First of all, I want to start off by thanking all of you and Gloria for your leadership, because the committees and the work that's coming out of these committees is really outstanding. I try to attend as many of these committee meetings as I can, but I'm very impressed by the work that's being done. I think it's a great way to take this Rural Land Management Board to the next level. So I appreciate that. With that said, I do want to bring to your attention that there is a Regional Land Use Planning Summit, and it's coming up on December 5th. It's at the Boone Center, and it will take place from 9 to 3. Now, this is a Blue Grass Tomorrow project. I've been working on the executive committee on this. And it's a day where we're looking at we need to be talking to each other as a region. We share borders, and they're getting closer and closer, yet there is a lack of communication. So we have put through a resolution to our council, and it basically addresses that we need to be communicating and that we do share these boundaries and the beautiful sceneries that we have, and we need to be cognizant of protecting those, but also working together. So that has gone through, and that resolution went before our council, and it is now being presented to all the contiguous counties. And thus far we have, I believe, five out of the eight that are seven contiguous that have approved it. And I can get a copy of that resolution, Beth. I'll send that to you. And then also on this summit, the morning is going to be talking about local, state, and national perspectives, including hemp, the housing study, perspectives on agricultural land, the keynote speaker is Mary Berry from the Berry Center advocating for farmers, land-concerning communities, and healthy regional economies. And then the afternoon are four different roundtable discussions, again, back on the same topic, but our own Gloria Martin will be chairing one of those roundtable discussions. So I'm going to go ahead and give this to Beth as well, and she can include that with the resolution and get it all to you. Thank you again for serving. Thank you for working on that. That's a great thing. Any other comments? Having said that, our new appraisals are here, and the chair would entertain a motion to go into closed session. You want to read that just for the record? Let's try on the floor there and see if it comes up on your screen. Yeah, we need to close the doors in there. Jennifer, it's at the top of the screen. Can I make a motion? I guess I can if I can't vote or not. Well, can she make the motion to go into closed session? You can't vote, but you can go into closed session. I don't want to overstep my boundaries. The system won't pick you up. It won't let me choose you as making the motion. That's where it's holding me up. Okay. I'll make the motion. I'll make a motion to enter pursuant to KRS 61.8101B to discuss the potential acquisition of real property, the public discussion of which is likely to affect the value. Do I hear a second? Second. Phil Myers is seconding. And while Beth is closing doors and getting ready, I will pass this out to you. And I will remind you again that when you leave here today, give these back to Beth, please. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. The motion has been made by Margaret Graves, seconded by Christine Stanley. Any discussion or comments before we go for a vote? Can we get this on the screen or do I just need to call for a show of hands? There we go. All in favor, please vote on your screens. And the vote is unanimous. Thank you all very much for attending and for taking such an interest and for getting us out of here at our 5 o'clock deadline. We're moving right along in all kinds of ways. Are there any other comments before I ask for an adjournment? Do I hear a motion to adjourn? Jennifer has moved. Is there a second? Phil is seconding. Thank you all very much. Thank you all very much.