# Water Quality Fees Board - October 14, 2021 > Auto-transcribed civic record · October 14, 2021 - **Permalink**: https://meetings.lexingtonky.news/meeting/5453 - **Source video**: https://lfucg.granicus.com/player/clip/5453?view_id=14&redirect=true - **Date**: 2021-10-14 - **Last revised**: October 14, 2021 - **Length**: 11,981 words > ⚠️ **Auto-generated content.** Audio from the official Granicus video was auto-transcribed with OpenAI's open-source Whisper large-v3-turbo model, run locally by The Lexington Times. Structured facts were extracted with GPT-4o; the narrative summary was written by Anthropic Claude. Verbatim wording may contain errors. See [methodology](https://meetings.lexingtonky.news/about/methodology) or [report a correction](mailto:editor@lexingtonky.news). --- ## Meeting Overview The Water Quality Fees Board met on October 14, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. in the North Elkhorn Conference Room at the Tate Building, 125 Lisle Industrial Avenue, Suite 180. George Woolwine presided over the meeting. The board addressed five agenda items, including approval of minutes from a previous meeting and consideration of infrastructure grant selections for fiscal year 2022. The board took eight votes during the meeting and heard no public comments. The meeting included two items requiring board approval and three informational items covering remaining funds recommendations, grant status updates, and other matters. ## Attendance The following individuals were present at the meeting on October 14, 2021: * Harry Clarke * George Ely * Donna Fogle * David Lowe * George Woolwine No absences or late arrivals were recorded. ## Votes and Decisions **Approval of July 8, 2021 Minutes** [timestamp: 0:07:01] Motion by George Ely, seconded by Harry Clarke. Passed unanimously 5-0. **BI-APP1-2022: Grant approval for Beaver Creek Hydrology, LLC** [timestamp: 0:27:39] Motion by George Ely, seconded by Donna Fogle. Passed unanimously 5-0. Full funding with stipulations. **BI-APP2-2022: Deny grant for Blue Grass Stockyards** [timestamp: 0:33:31] Motion by Harry Clarke, seconded by David Lowe. Passed unanimously 5-0. **BI-APP3-2022: Grant approval for Colt Engineering, Inc.** [timestamp: 0:38:07] Motion by Harry Clarke, seconded by George Ely. Passed unanimously 5-0. Partial funding with stipulations. **BI-APP4-2022: Grant approval for Community Montessori School, Inc.** [timestamp: 0:42:54] Motion by David Lowe, seconded by Harry Clarke. Passed unanimously 5-0. Full funding with stipulations. **BI-APP5-2022: Grant approval for Lakeshore Village, Inc.** [timestamp: 0:46:10] Motion by George Ely, seconded by Donna Fogle. Passed unanimously 5-0. Full funding with stipulations. **BI-APP6-2022: Grant approval for Lexington Center Corporation** [timestamp: 0:50:36] Motion by Harry Clarke, seconded by David Lowe. Passed unanimously 5-0. Full funding with stipulations. **BI-APP7-2022: Grant approval for Unitarian Universalist Church of Lexington** [timestamp: 0:52:48] Motion by Harry Clarke, seconded by David Lowe. Passed 4-0 with 1 abstention on roll call vote. Full funding with stipulations. Voting in favor: Harry Clarke, Donna Fogle, David Lowe, and George Woolwine. Abstaining: George Ely. ## Budget and Financial Actions The meeting included action on the following financial item: **FY 2022 Class B Infrastructure Grant Awards** The body approved FY 2022 Class B Infrastructure Grant Awards totaling $1,418,008.60. This grant funding supports infrastructure projects as designated for the fiscal year 2022 cycle. ## Appointments The following personnel actions were taken regarding the Water Quality Fees Board: * **George Ely** resigned from the Water Quality Fees Board * **George Woolwine** was reappointed to the Water Quality Fees Board ## Contested Items **Blue Grass Stockyards Grant Application** The Blue Grass Stockyards grant application emerged as a contested item during the meeting. The application faced community opposition and was ultimately denied due to non-compliance issues and questions regarding the project's viability. The decision reflected concerns about whether the applicant had met required standards and whether the proposed project could be successfully implemented as presented. ## Approval of 7/8/21 Minutes [timestamp: 07:01] The board reviewed and approved the minutes from the July 8, 2021 meeting. George Woolwine led this agenda item. The minutes were approved without noted objections or concerns. ## FY 2022 Class B Infrastructure Grant Selection [timestamp: 00:08:09] The board discussed and voted on grant applications submitted for the FY 2022 Class B Infrastructure Grants program. **Key Participants** Frank Mabson and George Woolwine led the discussion on this agenda item. **Outcome** The board approved the FY 2022 Class B Infrastructure Grant selections. ## Remaining Funds Recommendation / Discussion [timestamp: 0:54:18] The board discussed the remaining funds from the FY 2022 Class B Infrastructure Grant Awards. Key speakers in this discussion included Frank Mabson and George Woolwine. The board decided to reallocate the remaining funds for Fiscal Year 2023. This discussion was informational in nature, providing the board with an update on how unspent grant funds would be handled going forward rather than requiring a formal decision or vote. ## Incentive Grant Status Update [timestamp: 1:01:38] Frank Mabson and Scott Southall presented an update on the status of Incentive Grants covering the period from fiscal year 2016 through fiscal year 2021. The presentation included comments on select projects within this timeframe. This agenda item was presented as an informational update to the body. No debate or formal action was required as part of this item. ## Other Matters [timestamp: 1:22:23] Frank Mabson led a discussion covering two informational items. The first topic addressed FY20 Andover Neighborhood Association, Inc. matters. Details regarding the specific nature of this discussion were not specified in the available meeting materials. The second item involved setting meeting dates for 2022. The group discussed and determined the schedule for upcoming meetings in the following calendar year. This agenda item was presented for informational purposes, with no formal action or decision required beyond establishing the 2022 meeting calendar. --- ## Decisions - **Motion** — passed (5-0): Approval of July 8, 2021 Minutes - **BI-APP1-2022** — passed (5-0): Grant approval for Beaver Creek Hydrology, LLC - **BI-APP2-2022** — passed (5-0): Deny grant for Blue Grass Stockyards - **BI-APP3-2022** — passed (5-0): Grant approval for Colt Engineering, Inc. - **BI-APP4-2022** — passed (5-0): Grant approval for Community Montessori School, Inc. - **BI-APP5-2022** — passed (5-0): Grant approval for Lakeshore Village, Inc. - **BI-APP6-2022** — passed (5-0): Grant approval for Lexington Center Corporation - **BI-APP7-2022** — passed (4-0): Grant approval for Unitarian Universalist Church of Lexington --- ## Full transcript Well, I wouldn't call it a job, I'd call it a role of adventure. An adventure. Yeah. I love that. That's fine. Well, isn't every job an adventure? Yes. Because at different levels. Yeah. Mr. Ailey. Can we get down in here? Yeah, Lee. How are you? We've got kind of a squeeze in today. Yeah. Yeah, maybe we can give ARPA money to build a bigger comp. Or something like that. See, I think we should have a good table now. Just about another foot. We're all in it out there. They're utilizing space. They are expecting a new crowd today. That's one side. They're expecting a new crowd. Yeah. I know. My wife was looking in the OLLI book of forces coming up and saw that you're coming or are coming to some concert with OLLI. We play out at Senior Citizens, I think it's a night. Right. And I checked and they're going to go out at 81. Oh, okay. We'd love to have a big spring out in the parking lot so people can see it. That's usually our biggest. We usually got two or three hundred. Is that right? No, no. That's awesome. That's awesome. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Hey, here are y'all ready. Hey. Hey. You're on a high-end truck. I don't know. Everything's kind of subject to change these days. You play two. You play two. You play 14. Mm-hmm. All right. How you doing, son? What's up? I was a little sure in Spanish, but I thought it was a good idea. I think the Indian Bowl will be over here. No, don't worry about that. I know we're catching up and getting different perspectives. I think it's been a lot different out of course. I would say that's true. Yeah. I'll check if I put your phone number. Oh, I'll put your phone number. All right. I'll take my desk. I got some. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I was retired from the Coast Guard. I was retired from the Coast Guard. I was retired from the field. I was retired from the Coast Guard. I was retired from the Coast Guard. I was retired from the state. I was retired from the state. Good to see everyone. It's good to be here. Happy to live in the country. Living the dream. Yes, I just told him. I don't believe so. My understanding is that he was, he and evil were always like, working up his head. He got out of skiing when he was fishing. He was by himself. And they don't know what happened. I get in there every weekend. Yeah, John was a good friend, just a really good engineer. He worked with them. I worked with them at Bell and worked with them at West HDR. students here again yeah we work together we had a joint venture work general project on it together so we had a lot of fun time who knows some of the first people I met when I came here in 1999 those George and John yeah working as a team on Trump's with you yeah been here 22 years? Yeah, it seems like 50. Just like it was yesterday. Now when I came here was when when PTH was just beginning it's what looks like PTH. So I think that was the year that you guys moved off and you got out. I haven't worked this century. Lucky you. You brag it or what? Time moves faster to go longer, I'll tell you that. I'm finding that out. Yeah. All right. The clock says 9 o'clock. Yeah, let's make sure we record. Okay. I'm meeting to order. Thank you everybody for being here. Appreciate your interest and participation. The first order of the business is approval of the July 8th, 2021 minutes. I want you to copy that in the packet. Any corrections, additions by the rec operators? Very thorough, very well done. On move, we approve. It's been moved by George. Is there a second? Seconded by Gary. All in favor, motion signified by saying aye. Aye. Opposed like Senate. Motion carries. There are little postponements or withdrawals. So we're down to item 4. FY 2022 Class B and the structure grant for selection. So for this part, as we typically do, you will read grant determination forms. And just kind of reiterate, and then probably that will go to discussion. Any time to do this? Okay. The first application goes to Beaver Creek Hydrology. The requested grant amount is $127,050, the cost share amount is $2550, the project budget is $159,600. Grant project loans are number one, retrofit and existing parking lot with perennial pavers approximately 95 inches to 10 feet, unweighted stone aggregate, subgrade for filtration and temporary storage and to reduce stormwater windoff before driving its unknowing tributary two-time grant. Number two, install permanent signage as a stormwater educational tool. The signage will be placed on the property nearest to the San Luis Obel Road. It will highlight the plan of construction and performance of the stormwater facilities and will be visible as well as accessible to the public. Recommendations of the Director of the District of Autonomy. Advocate and proposed project new program and new requirements. The project score is 72.50. Approve the grant pitch for a full amount of $1107,000. $31,762.50 in the cost share. Approved the grant application requirements that we license. Applications shall obtain written approval, written prior to the birth name that our property does not know about that. Permanent payments shall not be installed within 10 feet beside the existing sanitary sewer and measures taken to the main infiltration, infiltrating water from entering into the sanitary sewer shop and the stoner trench. Number three, the operation of the plan shall preclude storage of certain materials on the permeable pavement. Operation of the plan shall be provided at the conclusion of the project. Number four, because of modifications to the market area, applicants will need to work with LFU-CG division planning to verify the regulatory of the projects. Number five, the project shall not proceed with fieldwork until the program to proceed is obtained from the branch administrator or greater water quality because of the potential for conflict in which LFU-CG practices. Number 6, the budget in the application is based on no underdrain applicant to provide results from the soil test. If the underlying soils have infiltration rate of less than 0.5 inches per hour, underdrains will be required. An applicant will be required to submit a revised budget that includes the design and materials cost for the underdrain system as cost share for inclusion and available attachment. Number 7, the budget in the application did not include funding for the proposed educational signage. Applicant's assessment provides budget that includes funding for the educational sign as car share for the board for inclusion in the grant award-winning attachment. The rate, the organization proposes a larger car share. Beyond that, required by the grant program, budget share reflected the 20.4% car share offering application, application. Departement of budget $2,550. Application number two is Bluegrass Stockyards. Requested $45,025. Car share $12,800. Total project budget $58,275. The rent-counter billings are number one, installed a 1,000-gallon tank with 2,800 pounds of side pellets, pumped and hosted. Water will be pumped into the tank from the bottom and rise to the top of the water where we're headed back into the car, recycling the water while it is being used. A continued stormwater education in the form of development of the brochure to educate people on new trip pollution, urban stormwater and agro. And a host of webinars by EPA scientist, Dr. Leek Kawana Nakununaf. Thank you very much. The recommendations included from the director of the board is required. The proposed project details be required. The applicant does not be appropriate as required. The project score is 70.4, not recommended for funding. If the grant application is approved by the board, approve and follow the information. Applicants shall produce the application of the individual who submit the application is authorized to act on the application of the new license. Number two, the inspection operation of the maintenance plan shall be provided with a project and shall clearly determine who is responsible for maintenance, including pellet replacement and frequency. Number three, the organization shall also provide an evaluation of ammonia and phosphorus reductions resulting from the site pellets for years two through five. Number 4, organizations shall maintain the system including the placement of the site codes based on sampling data for the 15 year maintenance expectations, including in the attachment data of the grant code. Number 5, organizations propose a larger cost share beyond that part of the program, but it shall reflect 21.96% cost share offering the application of parking in 12,000. Case number three, public engineering, no business at Sturrock Engineering, cost of rent amount of $124,000, cost of $46,000, total project production of $230,000. The grant project elements include number one, design and construction for the infiltration basin, number two, retrofit of the existing asphalt parking area with a permeable pavement, 3. Installed Rainbows, under 4. Permanent signage near the rain garden and front side wall of the building. Recommendations over the direct over visual water quality, applicant and proposed project meets program of the building requirements for the project score of 71.5%. Approved the application for the partial amount of $178.675, requiring a minimum of $44,668.75. Approved the application to follow this information. Happily, shall obtain written approval prior to work being done on properties not owned by that. The two would be, so the modifications being proposed to the Department of the Appetit will need to work with the LFCCC. There's a plan to verify the regulatory requirements. Number three, since the property being located in a historical district, the Appetit will need to work with the LFCCC in historic preservation to obtain a certificate of appropriateness prior to the project. Number four, the permeable pavement shall not be installed within 10 feet either side of the existing sanitary sewer and measures taken to be with infiltration of infiltrating water in terms of the sanitary sewer stone and the tribulation. Number five, the operation and maintenance plan shall include storage of certain materials when the permeable pavement. The operation and maintenance plan shall be provided for the completion of the project. 6. EMP locations to be modified to provide the minimum setback distance and distances stipulated through the engineering name of the college regulations and the process. 7. Underbroad detention is provided properly and will be required to perform to LFECG code coordinates in Chapter 16 on the list of division 2. 8. Since the cost of educational assignments exceeds what is typically approved by the Waterloo and Food Board, I can provide more detail about the site which includes an intimitability on the budget of the Capturement Act. The 9th is part of funding of the award. The application provides a budget to have the approved funds and associated costs shared will be allocated for inclusion in the grant work of the Capturement Act. The brick papers are $5,325 are line number 2 on the proposed payments in the budget shelf for the minute on the revised budget. Application number 4. The building Montessori collected a grant amount of $300,000, cost share amount of $75,000. The total project was $375,000. The building project must include number one, designing and construction of hernival paper, a positive $15,000. Number two, stonewater education by adding hernival paper project to the BMP list of stonewater education components already installed at the New York Montessori School. and previous LCC2 stormwater quality projects, including the stream restoration, rainwater harvesting, rainwater, power, swell, and weapons projects. The recommendation of the Director of Visual Water Quality applicant proposed project meet appropriate eligibility requirements with project scores of 70.7. Improve the grant application for the full amount of $30,000 in a quarter, a minimum of $75,008 in cost share. Improve the grant application with the following stipulations. shall not proceed with the full work until the written approval to proceed is obtained from the ground administrator with the director of water quality because of potential conflict with the future and of these in the current. Number two, permeable pavement should not be installed within two sides of the existing cemetery sewer and measures taken from infiltrated water entering into the cemetery sewer stone and trench. Number three, the operation maintenance plan shall conclude storage of certain materials on the permable pavement operation makes going to be provided with clues in the project. Number four applicants according to the Division of Planning that forget the project. Five applicants provide details of how they plan to avoid the rain garden, buffer wetland area, and the outlet structure constructed as part of the previously funded NFECG, a fiscal year 12 stormwater quality project, and a plan of action to restore items damaged from the construction of the proposed peritory permable pavement. Number 6, both electronic and hard copies of all newly developed education materials as well as the current project element of the program to LFCCC for its use as part of the grant. Here's number 5. Edesha Village, requested grant amount $212,932, cost share amount $53,233. Total project budget $266,165. The project elements are, number one, retrofilling into the existing sidewalks of the Pundal Road and Delon County containers. Number two, redirect existing down spots toward the proposed main infrastructure for storage and infrastructure. We provide underground detention as needed. Number four, stormwater education. Recommendation of the director of the Division of the Home, applicant and proposed project elite eligibility program eligibility requirements. The project scores 7. Approved the grant application with a full amount of $212,922, requiring a minimum of $53,230 in cost. Approved the grant application with the following stipulations. Number one, the project should not receive the fieldwork until written proof of the receipt obtained from the grant administrator or director of water quality because of the potential for conflict with future LFEC2 projects. Attempted permit of the statement should not be installed within 10 feet beside the existing sanitary sewer and measures taken to prevent infiltrating water from the interlink into the cemetery and sewer storm and trench. Number three, the operation will make this plan to store the materials on the permanent pavement. The operation will make this plan to be provided to the conclusion of the project. Number four, because of modifications to the parking area, applicants will need to work with LFACG official planning to verify the regular term requirements. Number five, if undergone detentions are provided, the property owner will be required to conform to the LFACG code of ordinance chapter 16, article 10, and the official check. Number 6, applicant to clarify the educational performance of the project and associated costs to provide a revised budget for inclusion in the grant award-winning attachment aid market. Number 7, both electronic and hard copies of all materials to be provided to elevate the system for its use as part of the grant award. Page number 6, Lexington Center Corporation, request a grand amount of $299,874. Cost share amount of $75,030. Code project budget $374,944. Grand project elements are, number 1, pavement removed. move approximately 20,000 square feet of the Curtis area, replaced with large open-line landscape areas and part of the network of sidewalks to support the town branch of the park. The net reduction of the Curtis area to be removed is approximately 16,000 square feet in 80% extra. Number two, manufacturer treatment area. Modified the Reno Street junction structure to direct base flow into the Northern Colbert and the downtown diversion structures direct flow towards the end of the road. Number three create a bioswale. Route the converted base flow from the manufacturing treatment unit through the bioswale area before outflow into town. The recommendations of the director of the Division of Art Quality applicant and proposed project new program eligibility requirements. Project score Approve the gratification for the full amount of $299,874, requiring a member of $74,960, and the consent of caution. Approve the gratification of the following statements. Number one, the project shall not proceed for the bill work until written approval proceeds to obtain the revenue, regular, regular, or quality because the potential for power will help the future LFCCC graduates. Applicants shall verify the need and ensure all permits are received prior to any string bank stipulation. Number three, tree plantings shall be coordinated with existing utility private plans and, if possible, the tree shall not be planted within 10 feet of existing utilities. The encroachment agreement shall be obtained and worked within many private utility areas. Number four, the operation of the maintenance plan shall be provided to the complete project. Number five, because of modifications, the partnering applicant will need to work with LFUCG division planning to verify the editorial requirements. Number six, the organization proposes a larger cost share beyond that requirement program. The budget shall reflect the 20.01 percent cost share offered in the application, approximately $75,030. application number seven unitarian universalist church budget requested grant amount of $299,477.66 cost share amount of $74,869.46 total project budget of $374,847 grant project elements are number one remove purpose as far parking space 36-inch mature oak tree. Number two, remove a dead cipro tree and mainline and add for permeable parking spaces to increase the level of parking spaces, but still not for infiltration. Number three, convert gravel area east of the mainline pervious concrete for an old fort apartment while still lying for infiltration. This expansion will include a painted labyrinth area on the purpose of concrete for aesthetics and construction. Number four, install bioinfiltration skills in the entryway culvert on the north side to do a slow runoff and provide infiltration. Number five, prepare to entry drive culvert and walls and stabilized drainage channels with the bioinfiltration church. Number six, install vegetating swells along the main driveway and between the new purpose canopy installed parking bays. Number seven, install canopy treatments in the market. Recommendation with the Director of Division of Water Colony, applicant and proposed project meets program eligibility requirements. Project score is 67.91. Approved the grant application for the full amount of $299,000, $477.067. Required then of $74,8369,46 in caution. Approved the grant application with the following instructions. Number one, the project shall not proceed with the fieldwork until it includes the proceedings of the tank from the main material as director of the Department of Department of the Potential for the Profit of the Future of the ECCT Projects. Number two, the permanent plan should not be installed within 10 feet inside of the existing sanitary sewer and measures taken to prevent the transport trains of the water from the center of the cemetery's sewer and the stone research. Number three, the operation of maintenance plan should include storage of certain materials on the permanent pavement and the operation of maintenance plan should be provided to the project. Four, because of the modifications being proposed to the partners, African will need to work with the LFCC Division Plain to verify the records of urban markets. Five, because the Sycamore trees are proposed to be removed with the oak tree, other trees may be impacted in addition of new canopy trees after they will need to work with the LFCC Urban Forest. Six, if the underground detention is provided, the property owner will be required to conform with the LFCC report ordinance of chapter 10 and part 10 Division Plain. Seven BMP locations to be modified to apply with a minimum setback instances stipulated in the engineering manuals code regulations and performances. The main tree planting should be coordinated with existing utilities prior to planting and the possible tree should not be planted within 10 feet of an existing utility. Encroachment of buildings shall be obtained and working with the green private utility Okay. So, we are going through the discussion of that. Okay. The typical of operations take on the school district, what did you say? Yes, in any order that you need to build, you might have a medical order, but that's why I'm very well. I'm not a few buildings, but I'm not a big one. Okay. We can do some money. Sure. Mr. Chairman, the same word as the Frank Ritter. Bigger Creek Hatton. Okay. Retrofitting existence. of the problem of the items. We have a panel for discussion of the Bigfoot Creek I don't know what you're talking about. This is Project OK. No, this is Project, this is Moves. Are you saying it's Bill Road? Yeah, I don't say it's Bill. 2516, Sunday for Loves. I'm sorry, thank you. Thank you. What's the will of Rue? I will approve it. And then, is there a second? I will approve. Second by Don. All in favor of the motion, Siddha by Siddha. Aye. Aye. Those like said. Those who are curious. Bluegrass Stockyard. I guess the first question I have is the history of non-compliance. Yes, sir. Before that, I have a list here in case you guys are interested. I'm just going to say in the same way, I did a great table of the noncompliance. There were a few issues with this application, but we're simply hanging our hats on the noncompliance issues because they've only come into compliance. Unfortunately, when there was a meeting, for example, at the old property here, they were in noncompliance for a while, and then the property went up for sale to KU. KU suddenly had a sense of urgency. We had to lean on top. So they started to kind of get things in order. This was the board over close to the- Yeah. Twice more. Yeah, right. And so the director was going, so I think we were in agreement that. Since they are also in the new location, they have a history of such. Would you guys like to? I mean, if you guys don't leave, how do you guys see it? Yeah, as well as there were questions about the project itself because they were dealing with Water Warriors who was essentially set to be the contractor. And so Water Warriors was basically championing the project more than the applicant. As a matter of fact, they tell you, if you look at the application, it's in Water Warriors They didn't qualify, so we had to let them know that this, that I can add to the U.S. Stockyards. It was signed by one of the gentlemen, Jim Akers, at Stockyards, and that was another issue because currently Jim Akers is not listed with the Secretary of State as an officer. So that's how we certify who we're dealing with, and we know he has involved with their problem, but it's still how we certify it. And so that's why we say in the grant, the grant determination form that the applicant does not need to go to the other department because he's not listed currently and they haven't provided any exclusive sense in contact with him to try to obtain. So they did advise the law this spring? Yes, they have. And they did not give you a satisfaction? Well, I told them the way to certify the application, number one, to qualify the application was to update they're able to report on the Secretary of State, and they came through with that, and today's the meeting, so we passed that deadline. On top of the fact that we had questions about the project, because Water Warriors is a new company. Less than a year old, have a two year contract, two years remaining on their contract with EPA. So if that company goes out of business, we're left with a fancy tank, but no need. So that's why we had several questions about it, But the compliance issue is the one that we were more concerned with, and so that's why we recommend it hopefully. Yeah, Charlie. So background on water lawyers. They are a new company. They have partnered LFUCG on a couple of different occasions trying to enter into the stormwater program to provide B&Ds. They're focused on farm ponds, retention basins, and that sort of thing like that. not successful yet not because they're necessarily not married in their technology it's like with any pilot they want you to pay for it they don't want to put any of their money into it so I only brought that up because you'll probably see them again they're a local company that is starting up and really trying to get something going in Fayette County since that's their home business and I I suspect in reading between lines of reading what Frank had prepared and they had submitted was that Stockyards was one of their potential clients. So they jumped in and said, we'll handle it for you. And Stockyards wasn't really necessarily buying in on this thing. And when Frank reached out to them, nothing. I couldn't figure out what waters they were working on. there's not animal waste is it? It's just off the roof? It's probably some animal waste as well. I haven't gone out there so I don't recollect exactly how their detention and retention is set up but I do think that they are collecting water that comes off of semi covered mucs and skulls. And so that goes into a basin and water warriors, their whole market to us was that they could remove non-point phosphorus levels. Does it take action on our part to endorse? Well, you see the recommendation that's mentioned in the credit determination form where we don't recommend funding for the project. So, you know, if you guys would elect to just make one vote, if you want to vote on each one, like we've already started that process. So, can anybody put out a motion to agree with the directive's recommendation tonight? Yes, sir. I will move to agree with the directive's recommendation. We'll move back here. Is there a second? A second. Second. All in favor of the motion, second time I say aye. Aye. Opposed? Opposed? Second. Motion carries. Next project is Coke Engineering and Blue Business as Thorpe Engineering. Designed the structure of the infiltration base of the ring card. I want to follow up on the concerns about high cost in black and pee panels for construction of site demolition. the staffers attention so yeah about the high cost yeah the concern is this high cost like details to destruction and site demolition That was the, under the comments questions, noted on the scoring sheets. Well, they did, Mr. Elder, Joe Elder, I did reach out to them about that. And they did provide more of a breakdown about the general conditions and the construction. I do have a deal, so we didn't have that. That's why staff felt comfortable with the recommendation. So we did reach out to address those concerns just to let you know. So going into, if awarded, we get to the Grand Award Agreement phase, we will have more meat to add to the budget for the taxonetic items. Why did the, why was the project partial split in money? There's from 184 to 178, 675, the difference between 5,000, 325. Because if you look at stipulation number 9 and the grand determination form, we found out that the brick papers that they were proposing for the patio area aren't porous, and so they were going to be under labeled concrete, so we felt like, you know, that wasn't necessarily a storm of our future. Just like we typically don't fund dumpster pads and things of that nature, We just wanted to eliminate that as part of concrete. Did they get to be talked really about this? Yes, they did. They confirmed that they weren't porous. It was more aesthetic. They could modify it so it was porous. Right. Or not have it concrete on the new sort of this. Yes. We'll trade around. Okay. That's our choice. That's right. Okay. Any comments, questions? So, Frank, they did provide more information on the sign. There's two signs, maybe? Yes, sir. It's page 26. It says front yard and rear yard, which makes me think there's two. There are two signs, right. Yeah, because that high-costal sign, we did reach out to them, and they said there was going to be two signs, and I addressed the conservative cost for the signage. And so they plan to provide more details about that. And I think, was this the one that was in the historical? So, you know, they think that the sign may have to reach a certain level for the historical district. It may have to look a certain way. And so that's how we kind of justify it. But we will be managing that going forward. The rent manager will make sure to approve of that or not. We let them know that typically assignment costs $2,500 or something. That's what the board will approve. And so we'll make you an eye on that. Okay. What is the one we want? I'm getting a good vote on it this morning. So, Coal of Engineering, the DBA and third-range union, what's the norm? New approval for partial funding. It's been moved by Harry. Is there a second? I'm second. Seconded by George. All in favor of the motion, signify by saying aye. Aye. I was like to say, curious. Okay, next up is Community Monastery School, Inc. Designed construction of permanent paper watch. A little bit of history on this one. This was a grant that was awarded some years ago, and they terminated that grant because they wanted to complete the whole project. And I spoke with them and gave the option of trying to phase it out, per se, like we've done in the past, like Transylvania, what have you. But I think they wanted to just reset all together. They have a new consultant on board. They were dealing with Ross Torrent. And so now he's going to do it. They're still dealing with Ross Torrent, I think they got Eco-Gro Bridgewater to be involved, more or less to be project manager. They feel a little more comfortable about the city. Let's see why they feel comfortable to be able to find for the full lot this time. Did they have a feasibility grant? I don't believe so. But they did do some work out there. I believe we had some stormwater grants. As I mentioned, the grant determination for me. back at 512. I think we did a bio-intention out there. Power-technical work here. Everyone's back and they did some work with the stream, didn't they? They did some work with the stream. And then they put some neandrews in that. Right. Or something, something like the floodplain. Yeah, and that's why we spoke to number five here where we warned them to avoid those areas that we had previously flooded. construction out there we felt like it was kind of going to be close especially for a staging area and probably going to bring it down a little bit we're still going to get the stone those areas and to advise the pain to try to avoid it any other comments questions Yes, sir. Frank, is this the point you want to discuss the issue about the new parking lines versus retrofitting parking lines? Yes. Yes. So, you know, Charlie had the concern that, you know, should the program be funding new parking lines as opposed to retrofitting old parking lines? You know, the way the program is guided now, it doesn't really point that out. So I think we're just trying to carve out something to where we focus more on retrofits versus new development. Because this is green space. And so we're going to tear up green space, which has infiltration to, you know, even though they're installing carnivals, is still this kind of like kind of a productive trend to reduce the surface right yeah so we plan on adding this item to our jay or meeting to discuss to see how we can possibly deal with this yeah the little note this reminded me because that's a front meeting in here the other day is that if we were going to do new parking lots you know we don't want to discourage it i feel like that a solid recommendation would be the cost difference between a standard parking lot that they wouldn't have to come to us at all, that we, from a grant standpoint, would fund them doing it in the manner that would be preferable to water quality. That's what I said. And this was the one I read. What I read new, and I'm like, wait a minute, it's a yard now, and we're going to give them money to go and run to the park, and I'm not saying it wrong. So we're seeking greater value. That's a good hope. Good thought. All right, any more comments, questions, concerns? I want some information. Let's will agree. Move to support staff's recommendation of full funding. Then move by David. Is there a second? Second. Second by Harry. All in a favor of motion. Signified by David. Aye. Aye. Those like second. Motion carries. Next, Lakewood Village. Metropin, Crispin, Stagox. Approval, marijuana for country cases. Question on papers from papers for use. Is there a problem with grass floating between the cracks and the papers? Is that an issue or concern? No, because grass, I believe, still allows for infiltration. So, I mean, I'm sure if it gets too out of control, that's where our maintenance agreement comes in. They're supposed to tame it a bit, but not with grass killed. They have to just trim it as best they can. So that would be how those, versus something that's a proxy between the ground in between, then they have to vacuum those this week. I should know if in funding these, whether you're saying that to be a concern or an issue or whatever. No, sir. In number three for an underground detention, the comment has existed. How is that determined? Because I believe they do a soil test. Mark, when they do these facilities, they have to commit to a soil test, and if the infiltration rates are less than .5, then they would require an underground system. So not a detention, but an underground system. So you've not just been decided yet. Well, that's why we put the stipulation in this gas tank. We've seen this in here before, it hasn't needed, and that would still, but that's in the storm market, if I'm not mistaken. Yes. That was a quality. I have a question. If they find they do have to go further on the project, how does the funding work with that? Did they automatically increase the funding? as mentioned in the determination form that would then add to their caution so they would have to they would have to fund it on their own it would just increase their cost share percentage that's all okay because this is you don't need increase the grant no we're asking for not to exceed the amount because that's the amount they requested so you know we wouldn't exceed the amount they requested any extra would come out of their pocket and it would just add to their cost And that's noted again for the stipulations. Any other comments, questions? This one came from feasibility studies. Yes, sir. So this is the one you guys like to champion the one that comes from feasibility studies. So they did a study on this stuff. Yeah, I remember the feasibility studies. So this is the result so that this begins to be tangible. I move to approve. It's been moved by George. It's been moved by George. Is there a second? Second by Donna. On every motion signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed, like a sign? I'm curious. Make sure Senator Corporate, this is really a cool project, a cool area. I'm just so happy that we can be a part of that to help you to improve the quality of an existent. Great facility, great community. It's very exciting to see this happening and this taking place. Pave of our rule, unbelievable. 20,000 square feet. This is another one that's sparring from the feasibility slash design that we funded previously, FY21, so the design is looking to wrap up by the end of the year. So this is the parking with the pavement behind the very top of the living house, where were the rough arena? Correct. There's a rather odd shape, I was just wondering how that particular shape was selected more. Is there any indication of how that is being explained that? Not that it really matters that much, but... Are you referring to the job? Part of the big project is how that particular part of it. I'm not sure why they chose that part. They have a new engineer on board than what they had mentioned previously. No. underground existing in the structure. There's sanitary, there's storm, there's all kinds of stuff there. So I think that box is kind of working around where the existing utilities are and the properties of utilities intended. That makes sense. So they got the work platform. I was also going to ask, there was no mention in Project Elements about trees, and yet, it just treats the recommendations. So I wonder why there wasn't an engine of a tree. Well they said, we're placed with a large open lawn, landscape area, so within that verbiage there, we just wanted to trade it carefully. If you look at the map, you can see that that goes across the Great Lawn area and in front of the stage. Can't have trees in front of the stage. I think their trees are more on the periphery of what we're showing there, but there's not a big inclusion of trees because that's all intended to be part of the entity. Yeah, okay. That's a good one. This whole project is just great. Hope it all works out. Major, major impact on the place. Yes. There's a lot of deep things going on with the Elm Ranch Commons and all the other stuff going on. This is great. All right, any questions, any other comments, thoughts? I hope you can move on. If you move by Harriet, is there a second? A second. Second by David. All in favor of the motion signify by saying aye. Aye. Those like so? Aye. Motion carries. And then the Unitarian Universalist Church of Lexington project. Modifications to parking. Another example of making grass and making a park model. Yeah, this was a feasibility study too, so. Well, it's currently a gravel. Most of it is gravel. And there's an old barn that is going to be replaced with the permeable. No. Any comments, questions? So, Let's roll the room. Move approval. Move back here. Is there a second? Okay. I'll second. Seconded by David. All in favor of the motion, signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed like said. Aye. You're standing. Okay. Motion carries. Alright. So, we're down to one item, both item 4 and item 6, and item 5, remaining funds recommendation discussion. Yes, sir. Okay. So, for this question, I will, I probably should give this first, just kind of read what the funding was in the first place. and then we'll add that to the city. With those, so the FY22 Class B Infrastructure Grant amount funded would equal $1,418,866, and that would leave $217,378 remaining in our Class A infrastructure budget. That's why we're doing it. Those funds we will keep in the budget that we will toward next year since we have already awarded the Class A education grants this year. That's typically what we get. God bless you all. So roughly a couple hundred thousand that we added to next year's job. And we go back and clean up the budgets each year for projects that come in under budget or what have you. We're trying to reconcile it and make sure it looks fun. It's all available for the next round of weeks. And we split those proportionate between class A's, the education, and the infrastructure. Okay. I think that is our standard operating procedure. It is. It makes sense. It's good to know that we have more money than we have. We have to fund most of the projects that are proceeding to fund. I think that's good. Yeah. We had a slow year because of the pandemic. It's a bit of a buildup and so we want to pick up our market next year. Sure. Well I think when we decided to maybe increase the local share and concerns I might have them fall down on those many projects but I don't think that's really materialized. We're getting good projects and we're getting everybody in our community to salute. Alright, Mr. Chair, I think revenue-wise we're fine especially in this warm water program because even if the pandemic didn't impact the amount of impervious surface there isn't Bay County and 10-dose impact on it whatsoever. So my understanding is revenues are fine. I think our concern will be like it is with everything else. This is a supply chain issue right now that the board might want to consider over the next couple of months that how they might address folks that may come back to you and ask for some grace as far as their schedules and stuff like that because it's a very good experience what we're experiencing trying to build things right now is a challenge. Right. An increased cost. An increased cost, absolutely, yes. Maybe actually not only to get done what you intended to get done, but it's costing more of where you're actually doing less. The same amount of money. The budget's made, the budget's made this go wrong. We've actually had that several times already with Andover Forest and Andover They mentioned the issue of when they got the proposed budget and the application versus when they put out for bids coming back almost twice the amount. And so in one case, Endover Forest, actually, they had the option of trying to request from you guys to try to phase out the project. But they elected to go with a new gas improvement, actually, in the last week, to allow them to use another medication tactic to arrive at the same conclusion. in a cheaper fashion. So instead of installing some stone agameming around with a pond there, they just did an erosion control like it made a lot cheaper. And they actually just completed it out there since the last time everything from the last started to see if that was pretty successful. That's out there, that was Mr. LaRouge project. Really? Interesting. Yeah. Is it probably the closest to where the clubhouse used to be? Can you see it off of Todd's Road? You can. Yes, you can. If you're going out that way, it's the ones that you're going out. If you're going out of town, it's the ones that you're going out. Okay. This is right. We may want to consider some type of process in which they may get people to stay on their brand and not their reward and we kind of reserve it in some way that if they choose to wait until prices maybe stabilize again and stuff like that they don't completely lose their place in line as far as a grant that might be something you want to consider this is something i'm asking the state to consider with us we're pulling the project today off the docket as far as setting a 27-inch probably went from $133 a year foot to $257. And we just can't, even though we've got a schedule, I'm telling EPA and the state, we can't just pay through the nose randomly with what new way to choose and whatever pricing we're just because we have a schedule. So you've all made very well here that same kind of thing six months down the road from some of our grant authorities and thinking about how to not allow them to completely lose their line in a place in line or their ability to do what we consider to be a great project, but giving them an extension and say, okay, let's wait and see how the market reacts and what they're allocating for money to cancel the project all the way up. So if they decide that they want to, if they can get the project done and the time for the cost to go up, Is that something that they will come here for or will they have to bear their confidence for? Most likely they'll probably approach Frank and Denise first and then, you know, we'll try to figure out a way to be organized in such a way as it doesn't burden the board too much about trying to be able to make that decision. except probably in January we'll have a better feel on it and how you all would want to approach that or how you want to be able to deal with those things in a consistent manner we'll probably be able to work on conversation we don't have a contingency that we allow but it hardly covers the shirt it's that kind of difference so maybe we'll have the option again to phase the project down typically or we would try to discover a route in terms of to mitigate the issues. Well, it is possible in this particular case we have a couple hundred thousand dollars that we're carrying over in the next year. So I think that's something the board's got to decide. Yeah. It would have to be project, you know, based on each project. Sure. Once you get past the scoring and the awarding phase, you know, you just can't go back in and just... Right. Okay. All right. Any other? Okay. I guess we're down to incentive grant status update. Thank you. issue for FY22. We have one last project for 2016. This is Peppermill. I believe Jennifer who volunteered to continue managing this project since she was the grant manager. It's at the ending stage. She just completed a pledge list for me. So we're wrapping up and getting her final report. And we're going to leave a little bit of funding on the project. So we have to do a changeover to put that money back in. Okay. Which is our tip. For the year 2017, there's one left. And this one's all important. And I'd like to know that we have some issues with this grant management, with this property owner here. We went out, and the manager's here. Yeah. He is unresponsive. He doesn't cooperate with us, with our emails and instructions. I mean, we have the liberty to go and do work and accept it as it is. We ask him for it, to provide us. I'm drawing. Look at it. Then you go out and execute. It doesn't come this way. You're supposed to give a land disturbance permit. I'm sure you guys know about the process. Land disturbance permit is a process going through the area. Well, this guy avoided much of it. We looked up and asked to know he had submitted the drawings ready. Design drawings supposed to submit 50%, 90% and then they were supposed to be able to commission at pre-construction meeting and invite the grant manager and the stakeholders out to make sure we're prepared for that part. When we look up at the things built, well, it's semi-built and then it stops because the contract you get billed under the full launch attorney. So the property will be taken upon itself to start installing the permanent pay for the set room. At the conclusion of that, it's a very rough project. So we're challenging whether or not we're going to try to get reimbursed for the minus, I'm sure, as law would probably think of minus whatever value of materials. So we're contemplating that. But I'll email him and try to get him to at least submit, even delinquently, some of these items, the drawings and whatnot, so we can have them on record as built at this point. But, Ahmad, the grant manager has gone out, done inspection, and has given him a punch list of things that have to be corrected before we can sign on. And so, another point I want to make about this project is that since the construction is under par from our perspective, we're asking him not, we want to ask the board's permission to forego the educational assignments, which would have LFUCG's name up on there. So we don't even want, you know what I mean? You know, we know we say it in the contract. We know it's a project coming. But one good thing is there wasn't funding for the educational signage in the budget in the first place. I'm not sure why at the time. But that's a great reason to say, hey, let's just forego this. One, to expedite the process. And two, to make sure we're not broadcasting. But before we sign off on it, if we do, he has to fix this. It's this project. You know, the subway for the parking lot area, he didn't prepare it. He didn't compact it to 95% high. You know, the standard factor. And there's dips and depression. Go on, correct it. So if you ever visit that parking lot, you'll be out there. I mean, it's a really rough line. So, is he made any effort to work on any other projects? I don't know. This is a guy, he's an individual. He has a couple apartment complex. And so he has an entity, that's how he qualified. He has a business with a registered secretary of state. He had a cost sharing. His application looked normal and he was supposed to go about things the right way. He had GRW as a consultant, but I think it was a situation where he was trying to get something for nothing. nothing for nothing, so he was being advised by them. They did drill up the preliminary drawings and what have you, and then they contacted me and said, hey, have you heard from this guy? We haven't heard from him for our pay. So, you know, but then I think at the 11th hour, he went back out to them, maybe paid him, paid his bill and got them to stamp his drawings and what have you. I don't even know that they were aware of what was actually built. And so we're in communication with them to make sure that they know what they're getting themselves into. He turned in what he thought was ass bills, but they were actually just the final drawings and not the ass bills, the red lines and whatever. So we're trying to deal with that. All right. That's it. So that's the longest update I have on 8th. Okay. 10.218. Yeah, 218. Keep that for us long enough. Yes. Most of these projects, we only have one, two, five, six of these remaining. These are moving along quite well. We had some issues also with the personal list, with the Bullhunt. This is a young man, Tom Johnston, who was kind of managing the project out there. He's kind of another guy that puts the park before the horse and kind of does his own thing. He didn't turn his labor service permit, so we're dealing with that as well. We're being advised by law as to how we are proceeding with that. Because this report is a little bit more to spec. It's a decent project. There was a few minor issues out there that they're tackling to try to get back in order. But I think we'll be able to iron this one out before it's over there. Cardinal Valley is moving along. Great. Scott, do you want to speak to that on where we are with the plaintiffs? I'm sorry, which one? Cardinal Valley. Cardinal Valley, we have had a number of challenges throughout the length of this project. I'm happy to say that we have got all the trees planted in the spring, and we have got the pollinator garden material ordered. It is due in. We're trying to nail down the timeline in the next three or four weeks, and we will be getting that installed I just got a mock-up of the sign I'll be getting that to Frank or review we are planning to do it both in English and in Spanish because the neighborhood that we're dealing with so we're working with an individual to help us translate the language there and yeah by the end of year we should have it. This is a project that you guys allow for them instead of doing a rain garden. I remember moving along just had some issues and the reason that we switched to a polyamory because utilities. Utilities. Right. There's no longer questions wrapping up Jennifer. You can do it with Keith very very there to just turn in with the final report. They actually turned it in and were just revising it. So that should be wrapped up. Uber has a resource. They had some issues with illegal outfall at the site. And so they're in limitations to try to get that removed and get some payment for that illegal outfall. That's how we have a sensor in across the Hope Center. Yeah. We're hoping that moves forward because we're excited about that project. Pepper Distillery is the... Pepper Distillery. We're there beginning to have some issues regarding just the economic climate and now with we've got plans about 50% complete but now with the material shortages we're seeing those price increases that are spending and so they're weighing their options at this point. I'll get with Brandon in greater detail here in the next couple of days. from the University of Kentucky in the 18th. They were granted an extension by Jennifer with another part of the admissions. People in their senses near the end. They had some supply chain issues as well. They're trying to get their signage up because that's the only thing left here. This is the one out on alumni at the stadium. They're just trying to sign up. They just had some supply chain issues trying to get their signage up. 2019 Prince of Wolf Run is moving along. 2019 Prince of Wolf Run is moving along. We're just waiting on the result. Actually, we reached out to them, and I was waiting on an update from Ken and Cook. I hadn't heard from him, so I don't really have an update for that. First of all, Prince of Wolf Run. Village of Rabid Run, I believe, they're pretty much wrapped up, according to the ! Yeah, there was three dead trees one day, the contact and the land escape from what he came back. Replenish the trees? Yeah, basically. Good. Like the Harish winter that we have, Yeah. So we wanted to see those replanted before we allowed it to wrap up. And then we have opportunity for learning, how. Goblin? No, he's right there. He's right there. Yeah, they, again, through COVID, had a lot of internal challenges associated with it and the project has had some challenges but we're on track in terms of the design now we met with division of engineering and they had some questions about the location of the paper units themselves so we made some adjustments to the plan and we're moving I think you reverted back to the original location, right? We reverted, yes. Well, yes, we reverted back to the original property address location and then we made a switch from one parking lot to the other parking lot because there are some property line issues that Division of Engineering was concerned with. with but then we've also expanded the scope of the project in terms of areas that we're capturing and their house but pick up those additional costs thank you Scott for FYI 20 projects all of these I had just spoken to a few of these and on the force they just wrapped up construction we just did a inspection, finance inspection, functionalization at that site. And we're from Neighborhood Association, the next one, they decided to do the construction entrance at Tides Road, but they had challenges getting a permit from the state. They're successful now. They're only a permit to have access from that site. We just did a pre-construction meeting out there. They're resuming, and I would also like to mention with this one, this was one of the additional agenda items, and the issue was that one of the RMP projects at the Arden Ridge trunk was going to conflict, but we just heard a word from Greg Newman that I believe the EPA has given us approval to forego that project. So, Andover Neighborhood Association will be allowed to install the permanent papers because that was the portion of the project that they thought made conflict with the design of that project. So, ma'am? This is going to happen. Yeah. So, they had plans to show up to request to utilize the funds for those permanent papers if they weren't going to be allowed to install them to fund the additional traffic measures caused by moving construction entrance. But since they will be allowed to go forward with the Permanent Papers, their request is never going to be removed. So they're going to have to take those additional costs and they're about to come out of your own pocket. And so they're going to submit a revised budget that shows those additional costs. Because they were set to go from Forest Hills initially and move the construction entrance to Todd Road. Which is pretty odd because it's a pretty busy road. So they're going to have to restore it since there's some cost behind moving the construction entrance. But it was just less damage to the green space ultimately and they wouldn't have to take out some of the trees. Okay. Thank you. The rest of the project, Fringe of Wolf Run, is moving along. Tanmark, I believe, the grant manager has been trying to see where they are with this project. They should be trying to wrap this one up for a second. They haven't spent any money? Yeah. They're trying to, well, this is one of those organizations that will install it and turn it one, grant reimbursement form, and we've seen that before. They're supposed to submit them poorly, but we've seen them cover all the costs and just submit one single reimbursement. Bluegrass Green Tours moving along just fine, all these educational grants, moving on to science. Division of Environmental Services are tracking those pretty big, and they're moving along quite well. So, Ashwood Townhouse is a little right up. What do we have? Yes. This is the implementation grant, right, that you're speaking of? Yeah. Yeah, because Mike had mentioned in our update here that he was waiting on the response. Yes. So, we met out on site with the new board members to bring them out to speed a couple of weeks ago. and they are now debating whether they want to move forward with the carports as a part of the project that they would pay for. Yeah, so if you recall, what we were doing was taking the, we had enough funding to take the existing carports down and take up the existing pavement, put down the bases for the carports and put the pavers down and they are now debating whether they want to move forward with putting up the carport as a part of the overall project and of course we're also dealing with supply chain issues and so we're looking to bid later this year with the hopes that contractors will be gearing up for 2020 too. This would have been a challenging one because they had kept receiving partial since it's such a small footprint. They kept receiving partial so they could do a little bit design here and a little bit there. And they finally got a decent chunk of the parks for the $99,000 there. And so they were able to move forward with planning at least of the eight permanent papers. Correct. Portion. See, Churchill McGee, that project's pretty much complete. We're just finalizing the attachment B, the maintenance agreement document. We had to revise it and then doing some change orders for the remaining fund. And thanks, Mark, for helping us have a program. Kentucky American Water, that project, this is the one with the trash collection that was moving along. The design is moving along quite well on that one. They're making it a little bit of design. Lakeshore Village, I believe they received a bid. The bid exceeded the grant amount here, and so they're exploiting options. We, yes, again, challenges of these times that we're facing. We had originally five bidders. We requested proposals for five bidders. We actually got just one. We actually have added now three more to that. And so we just met with one of them out on site yesterday. So we're exploring, again, bidding climate. and what the new contractor may come back with on price, and then we'll update Michael on that status. Thank you. North Lexington Holdings 2 at the 900 block. I believe they just got their land disturbance permit, and they're planning to move forward with construction on that project. They just did the kickoff of the university. The University of Kentucky, I believe they reached out to see if they could use their UPCs because they felt like it would be cheaper and be a savings for the grant. I believe Jennifer has informed me that they can as long as they don't exceed what they're asking for. I don't think we would have an issue because the UK has their own EPC contract that they did where they'd be able to get some materials cheaper. And this is the project involving the system, the water, the harvesting. That was an innovative project. Sayers, number 15, did they turn safe? Did they turn safe? Yes, they did. This was during COVID and so they had issues in the timeline. mind they just decided to they're going to come back and do this later thank you for the 2021s all these projects are moving instead of going through each one of those moving forward no particular issue with real matter of fact number four griffin gate has completed that construction portion i believe we're just kind of wrapping up they just submitted their request They're one and only requests for funds, and I think it's being reviewed. I think he went over with him yesterday, so he's making some changes. That's the only one that's pretty much done in terms of construction. Everything else is moving along quite well. If you guys got any questions about anyone in particular, we're happy to answer this. Question is, for 2021, looking at the total amount of grant funds, about just over a million dollars, it's quite a bit less than all the other years. They range from 1.2, 1.7 to... But that was our COVID that was great to pick up because we were funding these and so we didn't have as many. And even the ones that had an application request, they announced where it would have been. Okay. So this just reflects the actual grants that were made, not that money was available to me. That's why we have money left out of it. That's why we have money. I got the answer for it. All right. Very good. Let's see. And I believe I jumped ahead and already spoke to the handover of that next item. Unless there are other matters. Yes. I have already jumped ahead. I gave you an update during the status update about them basically counseling this request that they were going to ask to utilize the funds from those permanent repairs. if they weren't allowed to install those. But again, that's a good point, you know, because the new community has approved LFUCT to form a way to open rich projects. Gotcha. And so that's the council. And the other item is the meeting dates that were part of the package. Yes. As we do each year at this meeting, we always provide you with the upcoming meeting dates for the calendar year. and so we want you guys to review those and then approve if you have any conflicts to discuss so if we need to adjust the schedule. I think this gives us some time to know where our commitments are in 2022. I just want to thank you for your time. I hope we ought to go ahead and set those dates approved. Okay, so let's will agree. January 13th, April 14th, July 14th, and October 13th of 2022 are the same days as the second Thursday of each quarter. You want a motion on that? Yes. I move it. Second. Okay. They move by George. They're second. Second. Secondary by 30. I want to favor the motion. Seek five by seven, aye. Aye. Opposed, one, seven. Motion carries. I'd also like to mention that unfortunately we have come to the end of a couple of you guys' terms. Mr. Ealy, this is Mr. Ealy's last meeting. Unfortunately, we really hate to lose you, but you have concluded your second full term, and so has Mr. Warwine. And so we're going to be sad to see you go, sir. I hope you stay in touch with you. We'll be checking in on you from time to time. It's been a pleasure serving you, sir. I would like to say Mr. Woodline is at the end of the second term, but his first term was, he fulfilled the end of, I believe it was, was it Ms. Bonita? I believe you were, as she resigned, I believe you came in and took over the chairman's five, and so they took us to serve a second full term altogether, and so we're hoping that, you know. I haven't heard anything. Yeah, but they will because I heard from her recently. She's about to reach out to you. Yeah, go ahead. Yeah, so put in a new application somewhere. Hoping Mr. Willine can continue. Again, sad to see Mr. Ely go. We wish the rules were different. We'd like to see you continue. We'd like to keep you busy. George has. You have a great deal. Yeah. Value to her. He wants to beg off. He wants to beg off. Now, we're going to miss you, sir, and we want to make that announcement. And so we have applications. We have an application to fill that seat. And so we're waiting to hear back from there as well as your hopeful reappointment. Meanwhile, hope the rest of you stick around and continue as we certainly appreciate your interview. The terms are how many years? The terms are how many years? Two years. Two-year terms? No, they're four-year. I'm sorry. Four-year terms. Four-year concerns. I think there are two of them. They've been here eight years. You don't think? I believe so. They're important to their records. I think you think they're good. You might want to double check that. We're both named George and maybe they super post. You want to go on the line at George? You know, I would definitely sound like I've been here a long time. Sure, right? Not eight years. I said time passes pretty fast. I will double check that. I think you may have super post to George's group. They're looking at your numbers. I think they're looking at your numbers. I think they're looking at your numbers. I think they're looking at your numbers. I think they're looking at your numbers. I think they're looking at your numbers. I think they're looking at your numbers. I will certainly double check that. I think you may have super close to George's. The mayor's office is looking at them clearly. They're looking at the name, the application, the terms. So that's who I'm leaning on. But if I hear anything different, I will clarify with you as soon as possible. That was a way I can keep you both. Assuming that I am not coming back, I've enjoyed it as well. It's been a real pleasure working with our group. and I think we have made some really good decisions and made a purpose of the program and it's going well and it's really an invite to go look at some of these projects we've funded and it's really very well done. I think it's fulfilling the objective of this program. So I think it's been very worthwhile. The endeavor, I've enjoyed being here. If I come back, that'd be great. If not, that's okay too. Good money well spent. I think he said this is not our money. Well, you guys input has been completely invaluable. Of course, both of you guys are former engineers, you know, retired engineers and so on. You know, to have that view, you know, along with, you know, these guys' backgrounds, it's just awesome and so on. It's something that's going to be missing. So, again, we're hoping you can continue on. And Mr. Ealy, you make sure you take care of yourself. And again, we'll check in from time to time. It's been such a pleasure. Okay. I think that. Unless you want the floor for me. No, no. I don't do it. You don't do public talking anymore? No. Okay. I've enjoyed it very much. It gets me to stay up on what's going on in the community. We miss that after a while. Okay. I know we're great. One last thing I wanted to bring up that I've got to mention. During the July meeting, the amount that we had that was allocated to the Stormwater College Projects and Center Venture Program from the Water College Venture Program was a little bit off because they gave us an approximation. So we're correct. So the amount that was allocated aside from the additional funding recovered from underfunded grants or cancer grants was actually $1,520,000 and not $1,516,000. So we just wanted to make that note that there was more money allocated that came from the water quality because they give us 10% of the water quality management fee. That's how we come up with how much they allocate. So I just want to make that approach. Very good. Those are anything else? If not, we'll draw the meeting adjourned. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. We're going to have the outdoor activities. All right. That's 10. All right. And my band will be performing at Great Line if you guys are all right, 5 o'clock. I got a bad leg, so I'm going to be.