# Board of Architectural Review - November 17, 2021 > Auto-transcribed civic record · November 17, 2021 - **Permalink**: https://meetings.lexingtonky.news/meeting/5474 - **Source video**: https://lfucg.granicus.com/player/clip/5474?view_id=14&redirect=true - **Date**: 2021-11-17 - **Last revised**: November 17, 2021 - **Length**: 1,640 words > ⚠️ **Auto-generated content.** Audio from the official Granicus video was auto-transcribed with OpenAI's open-source Whisper large-v3-turbo model, run locally by The Lexington Times. Structured facts were extracted with GPT-4o; the narrative summary was written by Anthropic Claude. Verbatim wording may contain errors. See [methodology](https://meetings.lexingtonky.news/about/methodology) or [report a correction](mailto:editor@lexingtonky.news). --- ## Meeting Overview The Board of Architectural Review met on November 17, 2021, to review applications for various architectural and site modifications throughout the community. The meeting addressed 24 agenda items, all of which received approval from the board. The applications covered a diverse range of projects including home renovations, roofing work, tree removals and replacements, window replacements, driveway improvements, and site modifications across numerous residential properties. The board conducted 8 recorded votes during the session, with no public comments received. Projects reviewed spanned multiple neighborhoods and streets, including properties on Fincastle Road, East High Street, East Maxwell Street, Preston Court, Bell Place, Delmar Avenue, Fayette Park, North Broadway, West Second Street, Goodrich Avenue, Suburban Court, Arcadia Park, Dantzler Court, Elizabeth Street, South Mill Street, and West Short Street. The approved work ranged from routine maintenance items such as chimney tuck-pointing and gutter replacement to more substantial renovations including structural work and site improvements. The meeting demonstrated efficient processing of architectural review applications, with all submitted projects meeting the board's standards for approval. The variety of approved projects reflects ongoing maintenance and improvement activities across the historic district, encompassing both minor repairs and more significant renovations while maintaining architectural integrity standards. ## Votes and Decisions The board approved eight items during the November 17, 2021 meeting, all by voice vote with unanimous approval. **Certificates of Appropriateness** The board approved six certificates of appropriateness, each with two standard conditions: • **Case 43793017-c**: Certificate of appropriateness for 3017 Old Todd's Road passed. The standard conditions require: 1) Once reviewed by other LFUCG divisions, resubmit any changes to staff or board for review and approval prior to the start of work, and 2) If any changes are made that alter the information submitted, resubmit the changes to the staff for review and approval prior to the start of the work. • **Case 13140243-f**: Certificate of appropriateness for 243 North Mill Street passed with two standard conditions. • **Case 19750125**: Certificate of appropriateness for 125 Wabash Drive passed with two standard conditions. • **Case 08150163**: Certificate of appropriateness for 163 Goodrich Avenue passed with two standard conditions. • **Case 02510326-j**: Certificate of appropriateness for 326 South Broadway passed with two standard conditions. • **Case 12670428-j**: Certificate of appropriateness for 428 East Maxwell Street passed with two standard conditions. **Administrative Items** The board also approved two administrative matters: • Approval of meeting minutes from October 20th and September 1st passed by voice vote. • Approval of the 2022 meeting schedule passed with a modification changing the September meeting date to September 21, 2022. All votes were conducted by voice vote with no recorded individual vote tallies or opposing votes. No transcript timestamps were available for these voting actions. ## 1012-14 Fincastle Road: Tuck-point chimney and install chimney caps. The meeting addressed a staff approval request for maintenance work at 1012-14 Fincastle Road involving tuck-pointing of the chimney and installation of chimney caps. The agenda item was presented as a routine maintenance matter requiring board consideration. The proposed work includes tuck-pointing, which involves repairing and renewing the mortar joints in the chimney's masonry, and installing protective chimney caps to prevent water damage and debris accumulation. No specific speakers were identified during the discussion of this item, suggesting it may have been handled as a consent agenda item or received minimal debate from board members. The request was approved, allowing the property maintenance work to proceed as proposed by staff. The approval indicates the board found the chimney maintenance work to be necessary and appropriate for the property at 1012-14 Fincastle Road. ## 729 East High Street: Re-roof structure. The commission reviewed a staff approval request for re-roofing work at 729 East High Street. This agenda item was presented as a routine administrative matter requiring commission acknowledgment. The proposal involved structural re-roofing work at the specified property address. Staff had already reviewed and approved the project prior to bringing it before the commission for formal consideration. No specific speakers were identified for this agenda item, and no transcript timestamps were available for the discussion. The matter appears to have been handled as a consent or administrative item without extensive debate. The commission approved the staff recommendation for the re-roofing project at 729 East High Street. The approval allows the property owner to proceed with the proposed roofing work as reviewed and recommended by staff. ## 428 East Maxwell Street: Replace tree. The commission reviewed a staff approval for replacing a tree at 428 East Maxwell Street. This item was presented as agenda item 3 during the meeting. The request involved the replacement of an existing tree at the residential property located at 428 East Maxwell Street. Staff had already reviewed and approved the tree replacement proposal prior to bringing it before the commission. No specific speakers were identified for this agenda item, suggesting it was handled as a routine administrative matter. The discussion appears to have been brief, with the tree replacement request proceeding without significant debate or concerns raised by commission members. The commission approved the tree replacement at 428 East Maxwell Street. This approval allows the property owner to proceed with removing the existing tree and installing a replacement tree at the specified location. *Note: Specific transcript timestamps are not available for this agenda item.* ## 14 Preston Court: Renovate structure. The board reviewed and approved a staff recommendation for renovating the structure located at 14 Preston Court. This agenda item was presented as item 4 during the meeting. The proposal involved renovations to the existing structure at the Preston Court address. Staff had reviewed the renovation plans and provided their approval recommendation to the board. The item proceeded without extensive discussion, and the board voted to approve the renovation project as recommended by staff. No specific concerns or objections were raised during the consideration of this item. **Outcome:** Approved *Note: Specific transcript timestamps are not available for this agenda item.* ## 202 Bell Place: Replace replacement window. The Historic Preservation Commission reviewed a staff-approved application for window replacement at 202 Bell Place during agenda item 5. The proposal involved replacing an existing replacement window at the property. This item was processed through staff-level review and received administrative approval prior to the commission meeting. The application was presented as part of the consent agenda or routine business items that had already been vetted and approved by preservation staff. No specific speakers were identified for this agenda item, and no transcript timestamp was available for the discussion. The straightforward nature of the request - replacing a replacement window rather than an original historic window - likely contributed to the streamlined approval process. The commission approved the window replacement project at 202 Bell Place. The approval allows the property owner to proceed with installing the new window as specified in their application materials reviewed by staff. ## 206 Bell Place: Replace tree. The commission reviewed agenda item 6, a staff approval request for replacing a tree at 206 Bell Place. This item was processed as a routine administrative matter requiring commission acknowledgment. The request involved the replacement of an existing tree on the property located at 206 Bell Place. Staff had already reviewed the proposal and recommended approval for the tree replacement work. No specific speakers were identified for this agenda item, and no transcript timing information was available for the discussion. The matter appears to have been handled as a consent or administrative item without extended debate. The commission approved the staff recommendation to allow the tree replacement at 206 Bell Place. The approval enables the property owner to proceed with removing the existing tree and installing a replacement tree at the specified location. This type of tree replacement request typically involves considerations such as the condition of the existing tree, appropriate species selection for the replacement, and compliance with local tree preservation ordinances. Staff approval suggests the proposed replacement met all applicable requirements and standards. ## 220 Bell Place: Re-roof garage. The commission reviewed a staff-approved application for re-roofing a garage at 220 Bell Place. This agenda item was processed as a routine maintenance matter under staff approval authority. The application involved replacing the existing roof on the garage structure at the Bell Place property. As a standard maintenance and repair project, the re-roofing work was determined to fall within the scope of activities that can be approved administratively by staff without requiring full commission review. No speakers were identified for this item, indicating it proceeded without public comment or extended discussion. The straightforward nature of the roof replacement project, which maintains the existing structure and appearance of the garage, likely contributed to its processing as a staff-approved matter. The application was approved, allowing the property owner to proceed with the garage re-roofing work as proposed. This type of routine maintenance approval helps preserve existing structures while streamlining the review process for standard repair and replacement projects that do not significantly alter the character or appearance of historic properties or structures within the commission's jurisdiction. ## 206 East Bell Court: Replace addition. The Historic Preservation Commission reviewed a staff-approved application for replacing an addition at 206 East Bell Court during their November 17, 2021 meeting. This agenda item was processed as a staff approval, indicating that the proposed work met the established guidelines for historic preservation and did not require extensive commission deliberation. The application involved replacing an existing addition to the property rather than constructing entirely new structures. The commission approved the staff recommendation for the addition replacement project at 206 East Bell Court. No significant discussion or concerns were recorded for this item, suggesting the proposed work was consistent with preservation standards and compatible with the historic character of the property. The approval allows the property owner to proceed with replacing the addition as outlined in their application materials reviewed by staff. ## 157 West Bell Court: Remove damaging tree. The City Council considered agenda item 9 regarding the removal of a damaging tree located at 157 West Bell Court. This item was presented as a staff approval request for tree removal due to damage concerns at the specified residential address. The agenda item was categorized as a discussion item, though specific details about the nature of the tree damage, the type of tree involved, or the extent of the damage were not detailed in the available meeting materials. No specific speakers were identified as presenting or commenting on this particular item during the meeting. The Council approved the staff recommendation to remove the damaging tree at 157 West Bell Court. The approval allows city staff to proceed with the tree removal process at the residential location. This type of agenda item typically involves situations where trees pose safety hazards to property or infrastructure, though the specific circumstances necessitating removal in this case were not elaborated upon in the meeting documentation. Tree removal requests generally require city approval when they involve trees on public property or trees that may impact public infrastructure. The approval of this item represents routine municipal maintenance and safety management, allowing staff to address what was determined to be a problematic tree situation at the West Bell Court address. ## 241 Delmar Avenue: Replace storm windows The commission reviewed a staff-approved application for replacing storm windows at 241 Delmar Avenue. This agenda item was processed as a routine administrative matter under staff review procedures. The application involved the replacement of existing storm windows at the residential property. Staff had already reviewed the proposal and determined it met the appropriate standards for approval without requiring full commission deliberation. No speakers were identified for this item, and no transcript timing was available, suggesting this was handled as a consent or administrative item without extended discussion. The straightforward nature of storm window replacement, which typically involves maintaining the existing window openings and architectural character of a building, likely contributed to the streamlined approval process. The commission approved the staff recommendation to allow the storm window replacement to proceed at 241 Delmar Avenue. This type of maintenance and improvement work is generally considered compatible with historic preservation standards when it preserves the visual appearance and proportions of the original windows while improving energy efficiency and weather protection. ## 416 Fayette Park: Replace walks. The meeting addressed agenda item 11 regarding the replacement of walkways at 416 Fayette Park. This item was presented as a staff approval matter for infrastructure improvements at the park location. The proposal involved replacing existing walks at the Fayette Park facility. The item was categorized as a discussion item, though specific details about the scope, cost, or timeline of the walkway replacement project were not detailed in the available meeting materials. The agenda item was approved by the governing body without recorded opposition or significant debate. No specific speakers were identified as presenting or discussing this particular infrastructure project during the meeting proceedings. The approval allows staff to proceed with the walkway replacement work at 416 Fayette Park as proposed. This represents routine maintenance and improvement of public park infrastructure to ensure safe pedestrian access and circulation within the park facility. ## 247 North Broadway: Replace storm windows The board reviewed and approved a staff recommendation for replacing storm windows at 247 North Broadway during agenda item 12. This item was handled as a staff approval matter, with no extended discussion or debate recorded in the available meeting materials. The proposal involved the replacement of existing storm windows at the North Broadway property. **Outcome:** The storm window replacement project was approved. *Note: Specific details about the scope of work, cost, contractor selection, or timeline were not available in the provided meeting materials. No transcript timestamps were available for this agenda item.* ## 602 North Broadway: Renovate structure. The meeting addressed agenda item 13 regarding the renovation of a structure located at 602 North Broadway. This item was presented as a staff approval matter for the proposed renovation project. The agenda item was categorized as a discussion item, indicating that the renovation plans required review and consideration by the meeting participants. The proposal involved renovating an existing structure at the specified North Broadway address, though specific details about the scope of work, timeline, or budget were not captured in the available meeting data. The item proceeded through the standard approval process and was ultimately approved by the meeting body. No specific speakers were identified as presenting or debating this particular agenda item, and no concerns or objections were recorded in the meeting documentation. The approval of this renovation project allows the work at 602 North Broadway to move forward as proposed by staff. The successful passage of this item suggests the renovation plans met the necessary requirements and standards for approval. *Note: Specific transcript timestamps are not available for this agenda item.* ## 322 West Second Street: Replace gutters. The commission reviewed agenda item 14 regarding the replacement of gutters at 322 West Second Street. This item was presented as a staff approval matter for necessary maintenance work on the property. The proposal involved replacing the existing gutter system at the West Second Street location. The item was categorized as a discussion item requiring commission consideration for the proposed improvements. No specific speakers were identified during the discussion of this agenda item, and no transcript timestamp was available for this portion of the meeting. The matter appears to have been handled as a routine maintenance approval without extensive debate or concerns raised by commission members. The commission approved the gutter replacement project at 322 West Second Street, allowing the necessary maintenance work to proceed as proposed by staff. ## 157 Goodrich Avenue: Install new fencing and gate. The meeting addressed agenda item 15 regarding the installation of new fencing and gate at 157 Goodrich Avenue. This item was presented as a staff approval matter for the proposed improvements to the property. The agenda item involved administrative approval for the installation of new fencing and gate infrastructure at the specified address. The proposal was handled as a routine staff approval process without extensive discussion or debate recorded in the available meeting materials. The outcome of this agenda item was approval, allowing the property owner or responsible party to proceed with the installation of the new fencing and gate at 157 Goodrich Avenue as proposed. No specific speakers were identified in the discussion of this item, and no particular concerns or objections were noted in the meeting record. The matter appears to have been processed as a standard administrative approval within the meeting's proceedings. ## 131 Suburban Court: Renovate garage roof. The board reviewed a staff-approved application for renovating the garage roof at 131 Suburban Court. This item was presented as agenda item 16 during the meeting. The proposal involved renovations to the existing garage roof structure at the residential property. Staff had already reviewed and approved the renovation plans prior to the board meeting. No specific speakers were identified during the discussion of this agenda item, and no transcript timestamp was available for this portion of the meeting. The item appears to have been handled as a routine administrative matter. The board approved the garage roof renovation project at 131 Suburban Court without recorded opposition or significant debate. ## 211 Arcadia Park: Remove dead tree. The city council reviewed a staff request for approval to remove a dead tree located at 211 Arcadia Park. This agenda item was presented as a straightforward administrative matter requiring council authorization for the tree removal. The proposal involved removing a tree that had been determined to be dead and presumably posed safety or aesthetic concerns at the park location. As a standard municipal procedure, staff sought formal approval from the council before proceeding with the tree removal work. No specific speakers were identified during the discussion of this item, suggesting it was handled as a routine matter without significant debate or public comment. The straightforward nature of the request - removing a dead tree from city property - likely required minimal discussion among council members. The council approved the staff request to remove the dead tree at 211 Arcadia Park. This approval allows city staff or contractors to proceed with the tree removal work as needed to maintain the safety and appearance of the park grounds. ## 538 Arcadia Park: Remove hazardous tree. The council reviewed a staff request for approval to remove a hazardous tree located at 538 Arcadia Park. This agenda item was presented as a discussion item requiring council action. Staff had identified the tree as posing a safety hazard and recommended its removal. The request followed standard procedures for addressing dangerous trees on city property that could potentially cause injury or property damage if left unaddressed. The council approved the staff recommendation to remove the hazardous tree at 538 Arcadia Park. No significant discussion or concerns were raised during consideration of this item, suggesting the safety assessment and removal recommendation were straightforward and uncontroversial. This type of tree removal approval is routine municipal business, typically handled when city arborists or maintenance staff identify trees that have become structurally unsound, diseased, or otherwise dangerous to public safety. The approval allows city crews or contractors to proceed with the removal work. ## 203 Dantzler Court: Replace driveway. The board reviewed a staff-approved request to replace the driveway at 203 Dantzler Court. This item was presented as agenda item 19 during the meeting. The proposal involved replacing the existing driveway at the residential property located at 203 Dantzler Court. The request had already received staff approval prior to being brought before the board for consideration. No specific speakers were identified during the discussion of this agenda item, and no transcript timestamps were available for this portion of the meeting. The item appears to have been handled as a routine matter requiring board approval. The board approved the driveway replacement project at 203 Dantzler Court without recorded opposition or significant discussion. ## 1565 Elizabeth Street: Repave driveway. The council reviewed a staff approval request for repaving the driveway at 1565 Elizabeth Street. This item was presented as agenda item 20 during the November 17, 2021 meeting. The proposal involved standard driveway repaving work at the residential property located at 1565 Elizabeth Street. Staff had reviewed the application and recommended approval for the project. The item proceeded without significant discussion or debate from council members. No concerns were raised regarding the proposed driveway repaving work, and no speakers addressed the council on this matter. The council approved the staff recommendation for the driveway repaving project at 1565 Elizabeth Street. ## 1609 Elizabeth Street The meeting addressed agenda item 21 regarding 1609 Elizabeth Street, which involved staff approval for an unlisted action at this property location. This item was categorized as a discussion item and resulted in approval. However, the meeting transcript does not provide specific details about the nature of the unlisted action, the substance of any debate, or the identities of speakers who participated in the discussion. The outcome shows that whatever action was proposed for 1609 Elizabeth Street received approval from the governing body during this November 17, 2021 meeting. *Note: Limited information was available in the source materials for this agenda item, including no transcript timestamps or detailed discussion content.* ## 1613/1615 Elizabeth Street: Replace steps and side porch. The board reviewed a staff approval for replacing steps and a side porch at 1613/1615 Elizabeth Street. This item was presented as agenda item 22 during the November 17, 2021 meeting. The proposal involved replacing existing steps and side porch elements at the residential property located at 1613/1615 Elizabeth Street. The item was handled through staff approval procedures, indicating it met established criteria for administrative review rather than requiring full board deliberation. No specific speakers were identified for this agenda item, and no transcript timestamp was available for the discussion. The matter appears to have been processed as a routine approval item without significant debate or concerns raised during the meeting. The outcome was approval of the proposed work to replace the steps and side porch at the Elizabeth Street property. This approval allows the property owner to proceed with the replacement work as submitted in their application to the city. ## 353 South Mill Street: Replace replacement window. The Historic District Commission reviewed a staff-approved application for window replacement at 353 South Mill Street. This agenda item involved replacing an existing replacement window at the property. The application received staff approval, indicating that the proposed window replacement met the established guidelines for historic district properties without requiring full commission review. Staff approval is typically granted for routine maintenance and replacement projects that comply with existing standards and do not significantly alter the historic character of a structure. The commission accepted the staff's recommendation and approved the window replacement project. No specific concerns or objections were raised during the review process. **Outcome:** Approved *Note: Specific transcript timestamps are not available for this agenda item.* ## 728 West Short Street: Renovate site. The commission reviewed agenda item 24 regarding staff approval for renovating the site located at 728 West Short Street. This item was presented as a discussion item requiring commission consideration. The proposal involved renovation work at the specified address, though the extracted meeting data does not include detailed information about the specific nature of the renovations, the scope of work planned, or the estimated costs involved. No key speakers were identified in the available meeting records for this particular agenda item. The item was processed as a staff approval matter, indicating that city staff had reviewed the renovation proposal and was seeking commission authorization to proceed with the project. This type of approval typically involves administrative oversight of construction or improvement projects on city-owned or city-managed properties. The commission approved the renovation project for 728 West Short Street. The approval allows staff to move forward with the planned renovation work at the site, following standard city procedures and requirements for such projects. No transcript timestamp was available for this agenda item, and no specific concerns or debate points were recorded in the meeting documentation. The straightforward approval suggests the renovation proposal met standard requirements and did not raise significant issues requiring extended discussion among commission members. The approval of this renovation project represents routine city business involving property maintenance and improvement activities under staff supervision and commission oversight. --- ## Decisions - **Case 43793017-c** — passed (0-0): Approval of certificate of appropriateness for 3017 Old Todd’s Road with two standard conditions. - **Case 13140243-f** — passed (0-0): Approval of certificate of appropriateness for 243 North Mill Street with two standard conditions. - **Case 19750125** — passed (0-0): Approval of certificate of appropriateness for 125 Wabash Drive with two standard conditions. - **Case 08150163** — passed (0-0): Approval of certificate of appropriateness for 163 Goodrich Avenue with two standard conditions. - **Case 02510326-j** — passed (0-0): Approval of certificate of appropriateness for 326 South Broadway with two standard conditions. - **Case 12670428-j** — passed (0-0): Approval of certificate of appropriateness for 428 East Maxwell Street with two standard conditions. - **Motion** — passed (0-0): Approval of minutes from October 20th and September 1st. - **Motion** — passed (0-0): Approval of 2022 meeting schedule with change of September date to 9-21-2022. --- ## Full transcript And we now have a total of 15 historic districts. The board, which is appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the Urban County Council, is a part of the Division of Historic Preservation. The Historic Preservation Office maintains a full-time staff to assist you with your projects. The board encourages and recommends that applicants use them as a resource. The Historic Preservation Office is located at 101 East Fine Street in room 220. It is our procedure to consider applications in the order in which they are listed on our agenda. In each case, we will have a presentation by the staff and will hear any additional comments from the applicant. The board will then ask questions or make comments regarding the application and then hear comments from any other interested parties. The chair will then ask the board members to enter a motion. If you wish to address the board, please come to the microphone and state your name and address for the public record. We also ask that you write your name on the sign-in sheet by the door so that the information can be recorded correctly. I would like to note the following staff approvals before we begin our review of applications. There are certain items that the staff can approve, eliminating the necessity for all applicants to appear before the board. There are a total of 24 approved applications noted on today's agenda. And I'll go ahead and list those quickly. Number one, at 10-12-14 Fincastle Road, Tuck Point Chimney and Install Chimney Caps. At 7-29 East High Street, re-roof structure. At 4-28 East Maxwell Street, replace tree. At 14 Preston Court, renovate structure. At 202 Bell Place, replace replacement window. At 206 Bell Place, replace tree. At 220 Bell Place, re-roof garage. At 206 East Bell Court, replace addition. At 157 West Bell Court, remove damaging tree. At 241 Del Mar Avenue, replace storm windows. At 416 Fayette Park, replace walks. At 247 North Broadway, replace storm windows. At 602 North Broadway, renovate structure. At 322 West 2nd Street, replace gutters. At 157 Goodrich Avenue, install new fencing and gate. At 131 Suburban Court, renovate garage roof. At 211 Arcadia Park, remove dead tree. At 538 Arcadia Park, remove hazardous tree. At 203 Dantzler Court, replace driveway. At 1565 Elizabeth Street, repaved driveway. At 1609 Elizabeth Street, unlisted. At 1613 and 1615 Elizabeth Street, replace steps and side porch. At 353 South Mill Street, replace replacement window. And at 728 West Short Street, renovate site. We shall now proceed with the review of applications for certificates of appropriateness. The first application we have on our agenda is 428 East Maxwell Street. change openings in rear addition and construct garage and site work. Is the applicant here? The applicant is on its way, but it's not here presently. Okay. We'll move that one to the end. We'll move that to the end of the agenda. Our second application has been withdrawn. The third one we have is at 3017 Old Todd's Road to demolish shed, construct garage and site work. Is the applicant here? Mr. Chairman, the applicant is not here, but they were emailed their staff report. Okay. Can we assume that we could go ahead and make a motion on this one? That they would have no objection? I would think not. It's only the two standard recommendations. All right. Well, I'll turn to the board. If you have any questions or comments about this one or any from the audience, would there be a motion to approve the application? Chair, per case number 43793017-C at 3017 Old Todd's Road, I move that we approve this application for a certificate of appropriateness with the two standard conditions. Would you like for me to read those? Oh, yes, if you could read those on this particular case. Standard condition number one is once reviewed by other LFUCG divisions, resubmit any changes to staff or board for review and approval prior to the start of work. Number two, if any changes are made that alter the information submitted, resubmit the changes to the staff for review and approval prior to the start of the work. Is there a second? Second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. All those in favor say, all those opposed say nay. The application is approved. Our next application is at 243 North Mill Street, construct one and a half story garage. Is the applicant here? good afternoon darren taylor 239 north mill street thank you sir um the staff has recommended approval for your application with our two standard conditions uh are you in agreement with those conditions yes i am thank you um would the board members have any questions or comments about the application. All right. Would there be a motion? Chair, as per case number 1314-0243-F at 243 North Mill Street, I move that we approve the certificate of appropriateness with the standard two conditions. Is there a second? I second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. All those opposed say nay. The application is approved. Thank you for your cooperation with the board. Our next application is at 125 Wabash Avenue. Constructor Dormer is the applicant here. Hello, please state your name and address for the record. Jesse Field, 125 Wabash Drive. Thank you, Ms. Field. The staff has recommended approval of your application with our two standard conditions. Are you in agreement with those? Yes. Okay, thank you. Would the board have any questions or comments regarding this case? Or any from the audience? All right. Can there be a motion? Chair, per case number 1975-0125 at 125 Wabash Drive, I move that we approve this application for a certificate of appropriateness with the two standard conditions as noted. Second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Those opposed nay. The application is approved. Thank you very much, Ms. Field. The next case that we have is 163 Goodrich Avenue, construct screen porch edition. Excuse me, I've got to take this off. 1050 Enterprise Drive, Charles Penn. Thank you, sir. Mr. Penn, the staff has recommended approval of your application with the two standard conditions. Is there you in agreement with those conditions? Anytime I'm here, I'm always agreeable. Wonderful. Thank you. Would the board have any questions or comments on the case? No. Or from the audience? All right. I think we even had one letter from a neighbor who was affirmative for the whole thing. Okay. Well, thank you, sir. Would there be a motion to approve? Chair, as per case number 0815-0163 at 163 Goodrich Avenue, I move that we approve the application for the Certificate of Appropriateness with the standard two conditions. We second. Second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed nay. The application is approved. Thank you very much, Mr. Penn. Thank you. And our final application tonight is at 326 South Broadway, install new opening on side of structure. Is the applicant here? Rich Maines, 326 South Broadway. Thank you, Mr. Maines. Staff has recommended approval of your application with our two standard conditions. Are you in agreement with those two conditions? Yes. Thank you, sir. Would the board members have any questions or comments for the audience? Would there be a motion of any sort? Chair, per case number 02510326-J at 326 South Broadway, I move that we approve this application for a certificate of appropriateness with the two standard conditions. Any second? Second. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. Opposed nay. Your application is approved. Thank you. Thank you very much, sir. The other items we have on our agenda will be a review of our minutes. We have to revisit this one. Thank you. Sorry. This is East Maxwell. All right, we will review the application at 428 East Maxwell Street, change openings in rear addition, construct garage, and site work. If you could state your name and address for the record. Jake Wiseman, 428 East Maxwell. Thank you, sir. I believe staff has recommended an approval of your application with our two standard conditions. Are you in agreement with those conditions? I am. Thank you. Would the board have any questions or comments? None. Our audience is gone. Would there be a motion towards this application? Chair, as per case number 12670428-J at 428 East Maxwell Street, I move that we approve this application for a certificate of appropriateness with the standard two conditions. Second. All those in favor of the motion say aye. Aye. Aye. All those opposed nay. The application is approved. Thank you very much, sir. Thank you. Thank you. And that's all of them, right? We don't have any? Yes. Okay. We have minutes to review from October 20th and September 1st of this year. Would there be a motion to approve? I so move. Second. The motion is approved, passed. The minutes are approved. and we're also to review our calendar for the 2022 meeting schedule. Can we just make one change that Ms. Hill brought up, which the meeting in September is the 21st, not the 25th. Okay. What's the date in September? September 21st. 21st. And I'll send out a proper agenda to you all. Sorry, my scribbles on my notepad got overlapped. Okay. So I move that we approve. We have to approve the schedule. So I move that we approve the schedule with the change of date for September being changed to 9-21-2022. Second. All right. All those in favor say aye. Aye. Aye. The schedule is approved. and guys I forget how to adjourn this at the end is there any other business that's all the business is that it? that's it is there a motion to adjourn? so moved we're adjourned okay thank you Amelia