Thank you. It's one o'clock, so let's get going. Welcome everyone. I first want to welcome our council members. Councilmember Kathy Plowman, Councilmember Chuck Ellinger, there you are, Councilmember Whitney Baxter, Councilmember Liz Sheehan, Councilmember James Brown, Councilmember Fred Brown, thank you very much for being with us. I want to welcome Mary Quinn Raymer, President of Visit Lex, Chris Ford, our Commissioner of General Services, and Monica Conrad, our Director of Parks and Recreation. Well, this is a very exciting day in Lexington. And in a minute, you're going to see why. This is, I think, definitely one of the most exciting in my tenure as mayor in the last three and a half years. And now we want to show you. So here's why it's exciting. And I'll let this go for a few seconds. And Craig's going to put up a map. So what you are looking at is 30 acres of riverfront property that the city is purchasing. This will be the only public access to the Kentucky River in Fayette County. I have been working on this project since the first day in the mayor's office, and I'm thrilled it's finally happened. I learned about this property just before I became mayor. This will provide new opportunities for recreation in Lexington. It will be a beautiful new park. and those who love kayaks and canoes will have a place to get onto the river and travel 12 miles between locks. The city has signed an agreement of sale for the property with John Kelly, whose family has owned this property for decades. As you can see on the map, the property is located off Old Richmond Road near the I-75 bridge into Madison County. Monica Conrad and I have been negotiating with the Kelly family since 2019 and have walked the property with them a few times. Naturally, the pandemic delayed us a bit, but it delayed everything, so we are just thrilled to be here today. Chris Ford got involved with the negotiations in the last few months, and everything came together just this past Friday. And we are wasting no time in moving forward. Now, next, I want us to hear from Councilmember Plowman, who represents the Riverfront area. Councilmember Plowman. Thank you, Mayor. Wow, what great news for the 12th District, our entire community, and the region. This announcement and acquisition today brings a whole new dimension to our city and our county. We have so much going on right now. a new state-of-the-art convention center, Town Branch Commons, an ever-growing, vibrant downtown, Breeders' Cup on the horizon, and, as always, our unparalleled horse farms and rural scenery. Now we can add 30 acres adjacent to the Kentucky River. Years ago, I learned and I repeat often that Lexington, Kentucky, is the largest city in the United States furthest away from a body of water. It's always been a fun fact to know and tell. Well, today we are going to make up for it as we celebrate the city and county has bridged that distance gap. We are right at the water's edge. Thanks to all who have persistently worked to make this happen. Mayor Parks and Rec's leadership, Monica Conrad, and Commissioner Ford. My husband and I have a kayak, and we can't wait to take that first inaugural boat ride down the Kentucky River. This is another feather in Lexington's hat. Thank you. Thank you, Councilmember Plowman. So as we were working on the purchase of this property, we consulted Mary Quinn Raymer, president of Visit Lex. and she's here, I think she's pretty excited too, to talk about new tourism opportunities. Welcome, Mary Quinn. Thank you. You know, in tourism, you're not supposed to have favorite children, but this is at the top of my list. So it is so exciting to be here today. Thank you, Mayor, for the invitation. Thank you, Commissioner Ford and Monica Conrad. It's been a great partnership with you all over these last, it's almost been two years, really, since we first had our initial conversation. And obviously a wonderful and heartfelt thank you to the Kellys for the legacy that they are passing on to us with this wonderful opportunity for us to take some beautiful riverfront property and turn it into a park that's going to be a great source of enjoyment for our citizens but also for our visitors. A few years ago, we took an internal look at Visit Lex about the way that we were promoting our city and how we were conveying that message. and we realized that we had not done enough when it came to outdoor recreation and the opportunities afforded by getting outside and enjoying all that we had to offer. And so we really started to make a conscientious effort to make sure we were letting our visitors know how much fun could be had by taking in our many wonderful outdoor recreational opportunities. And there's certainly no shortage of that throughout the entire state of Kentucky. and as i was looking at some of our materials and going back through the history and heritage of the city i realized that the river had at once been such a recreational destination for folks of course all that changed when the lock system changed and we had lost some of that um some of that travel along the river and i was really curious could we could we get it back of course fast forward to 2020 it's a pandemic everything about the way that people was traveling was very different and recreation boomed to the top of the list it was driving nearly all of traffic visitation in those early summer months of 2020 and that's when i started taking a real hard look at the river at that point i realized that no surprise mayor gorton was one step ahead of me and she was already working on it and we had the opportunity in the fall of 2020 to tour the properties with Mr. and Mrs. Kelly got a wonderful history about how active that riverfront used to be and really the wheels just started spinning about all that could happen if we had access to this waterway in such a significant presence. So I am really excited to be standing here to you in front of you today. I can tell you that recreational tourism continues to thrive. It is a multi-million dollar part of our tourism economy in Kentucky and certainly here in Lexington. I look forward to the ways that we can continue to provide environmental education and preservation of our historic waterways and land that is quite precious and certainly all the fun that can be had up and down the river. I too have a kayak and I hope that I am invited on the inaugural trip. So thank you so much. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. I said, I guess I have to get a kayak, right? Finally, I want to invite Monica Conrad, our Director of Parks and Recreation, to the podium. She definitely sees all kinds of opportunities for this property for recreation, and Monica also is very excited about this. Welcome. Thank you, Mayor. I'm gonna have to buy a kayak and get on that inaugural trip. Parks is honored to be entrusted with this land long held by the Kelly family. It will increase our public green space and recreational opportunities for Lexington and the surrounding region. Improving river trail activities, obtaining land for an additional nature park, were all part of our 2018 Parks Master Plan. As we've learned throughout the pandemic, Lexington values their outdoor recreational space. We saw record visitation over the past two years at McConnell Springs and at Raven Run. Expansion of natural areas at the Kelly property not only increases our recreational space, but it'll ease the burden on some of our existing nature parks. It'll also improve that regional trail access and really give the community more diverse opportunities to recreate. We've listened to users requesting expanded recreational opportunities. Having access to the river will allow our natural areas experts to add unique programs to their already robust schedules. We anticipate future programs, such as interpretive canoe trips, geological, water quality, and river ecosystem programming, birding from canoes, as well as sharing the history of Fayette County's relationship with the river. Our parks continue to improve our commitment to bring new programs and recreational opportunities to all ages to your parks. We hope you'll explore all of our natural areas. Our team in maintenance, natural areas, in planning and design look forward to working on this park in the near future. Thank you. Thank you very much, Monica. The city has not yet set an opening date for the property. We have a little bit of work to do to get it ready for people. We think it will be worth the wait and it will be a very exciting ribbon cutting down there. Before we go to one-on-one questions for any of the speakers, I do want to give a special shout out to GTV. Chris Edwards and his team, not only do they help put on these press conferences, but they, Chris enabled us to get drone footage so that we could show you today with the weather we wanted to be on the property but really didn't feel we could. So thank you very much for that. And now those who've been speakers will take one-on-one questions. Thank you very much for being here. All right. Thank you. The End Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I'm going to go ahead and put it in the middle of the room. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. I'm going to go to the next video. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. . . . . . . Thank you. Good afternoon everyone. It's now 1.31, I'd like to call this meeting to order. But before we get started, I'd like just to give a moment of silence for all the lost ones that we've had in the country and also the ones that we've had here locally in the last three days. So if we may, just a few seconds. Thank you. We're on the agenda item two, approval of minutes. This is the April 28th, 2022 minutes. The floor is open for a motion for the approval of the minutes. Mr. Chair. I'm sorry. We actually did not email out the minutes for you to review. So if we could hold those for two weeks, we'll put them on the early June meeting for approval. We'll be happy to. Okay, thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Healy, for stepping up so quick. So we'll go to the agenda item three, any postponements and or withdrawals. Good afternoon, Zach Cato Billings Law Firm. Here to request postponement on agenda item 5C2 on page four. That is the PUD 3 zoning ordinance text amendment. We've been in communication with staff and we think July 14th will be the best date to have this hearing. That will allow us time to go over the most recent revisions from the applicant, iron out the details and be prepared to present. So we request postponement to the July 14th hearing date. Okay, thank you Mr. Cato. Any questions for the applicant, commission? Okay, the floor is open for a motion for a one month, actually one and a half month postponement to the July 14th meeting. Mr. Pinn? Mr. Chairman, I move for a one and a half month postponement to July 14th for PLN, Zota 22.6. Thank you, sir. We have a second by Mr. Beall. Any further discussion to that motion? All in favor, please vote via Granicus. Motion passes unanimously. Thank you, Mr. Cato. Thank you. Mr. Murphy. Mr. Chairman, I'm Dick Murphy on page three, item C1, PLNZOTA 22-1, amendment to Article 17, signage regulations to allow a digital marquee. I represent the applicant in that. We're requesting a one month continuance on that. You had a hearing a month ago on that. We'd asked for, you did a continuance then, so we'd ask for a continuance today. We've been speaking, we've had a number of dialogues with the staff on that over the last month. And what we're doing now is my client is getting some sketches and putting some things together so he can visualize what we've been talking about. It just takes a little time to get those done. So we're asking for the one month, that would be June 23rd. Okay, got it. Any questions? I know Mr. Penn has gone. Yes. Mr. Murphy, Ben, it's just going to be two months since we had the hearing at the continuance. Can we just see inside have an abbreviated statement of how we got to where we are so that both, so the people going forward two months from now have a refresher on where we are, how we got to where we are. Yeah, you mean on June 23rd? Can we do that? On July the 14th. No, no, this one's, uh. I'm asking for June 23rd. This was June 30th. June 23rd, I think, is the technical committee. 23rd. Is it the 30th? Oh, my. Our hearing is June 23rd. Oh, my. Yeah. Nope, that's wrong on the agenda. I apologize. Is it wrong on the agenda? Mm-hmm. That's what I'm going by. Yep, June 23rd is our hearing date for the Zoma. Okay, I didn't forget that. Thank you, Mr. Murphy. Thank you. Any questions? Further questions? I thought you said July 14th. Okay. Mr. Penn, you want to make that motion? I will. Yes, sir, the floor is open. June 13th, postponement. 23rd. 23rd, messed up everywhere. PLN is owed at 22-1. Okay. The June 23rd meeting. So we have a motion for the continuance for June 23rd. And we have a second by Mr. Bell. All in favor, please vote Villagranicus. Motion passes, thank you. Thank you. So next on the agenda item will be page two. Agenda item one, PLN MAR22-6AU and Associates Incorporated. Mr. Chair, I believe that this item is available to be heard as an abbreviated item. If there is anyone in the audience that has any comment on this or would like this application to be pulled for a full public hearing, please raise your hand now. Sir, I do believe this could be heard in an abbreviated fashion. Okay. Okay. Thank you. I got you. I got you. Ladies and gentlemen, this is PLNMAR 22-00006, AU Associates, Inc. This is for the properties located at 96 Codell Drive and 601 Old Todd's Road and a portion of remnant right-of-way that separates this property from a neighboring property. The applicant is seeking to change the zone from an agricultural urban or AU zone to the planned neighborhood residential R3 zone in the effort to develop an affordable housing multifamily complex on these two properties as well as an adjacent parcel. Associated with this application is a variance request. After Mr. Martin reviews the development plan, I'll come back up and quickly go over that request. We are located off of Richmond Road located right here just up to old Todd's Road. Old Todd's Road was actually shifted at one point in time it came across the site here and then came back down over towards Richmond Road. This is one aspect of what we will be reviewing with this application and somewhat of the unique characteristic of the site. Jumping in a little closer you can see that there's a host of different zoning including commercial zoning with the B3 located to the south. professional office and then various different types of residential zoning including the R1T our townhouse zoning planned neighborhood residential and that high density apartment R4 zone jumping into the aerial photography of the site you can see how this area has developed over time and we have some townhouse development located here and here the commercial as I indicated below here and then single-family detached to the north and east of the subject property. This portion of the property we're located right here, well not part of the zone change application, is part of the development of this property. It is currently zoned R3 and is currently just being utilized as a single-family residence. It was actually the location of a club at some point in time. The Properties that we are discussing are the remnant portions of land that were created through the realignment of old Todd's Road. This was a state project that created a little bit more access to Richmond Road and a safer access for this collector roadway. Jumping into the site itself, on this top photo you can see we're looking into the property. It is a smaller property. It is just the confluence of those two roadways. The two roadways you can see are kind of aligned right here in which we're here. We're looking up Old Todd's Road. We're looking down Codell Drive towards Lowe's. Then we're looking down Old Todd's Road towards Richmond Road and then Codell Drive at this location. Here's just another view on the top of that commercial that is opposing this property. And then at the base, there is actually that driveway that enters into the property and provides access. This is actually the location of the current right-of-way, that remnant portion of right-of-way that separates these two properties from 100 Codel Drive, the already R3 zoned portion of property, which will hold the vast majority of the proposed development. With most zone changes, you would hear me talk about compliance with the comprehensive plan and the place builder element of our comprehensive plan. In this case, the applicant is really focused in on trying to deal with these remnant portions. This remnant portion of the project is small and unique in characterization and would make it very difficult for the applicant to apply the place builder and meet with a lot of the elements of the comprehensive plan that are outlined within the place builder. The applicant has indicated that they are seeking to apply various different elements of the comprehensive plan to their development as a whole, but on this site, it is very difficult. Therefore, they are utilizing an alternative justification for their zone change. They are seeking to indicate that the current zoning is inappropriate, and the R3, or the planned neighborhood residential zoning, is the most appropriate. Staff is in agreement with the applicant with their justification that the AU zoning is inappropriate for this location. The AU zoning is meant to be a placeholder, the agricultural urban. It is within our urban service boundary. It is not able to be utilized for agricultural purposes specifically at this location. And it does have access to urban services at this location. The R3 zoning is an appropriate zone as there is significant R3 zoning abutting the subject property, and the property that they are seeking to group in with to create their development is currently zoned planned neighborhood residential. Staff is recommending approval of the zone change from the AU to the R3 as the AU zoning is intended to be transferred over to our more urbanized zoning. And the proposed R3 zoning is most appropriate as it is associated with the adjacent parcel that will be developed at this location. With all zone change applications, this is subject to the approval and certification of PLN MJDP 22-00023, which Mr. Martin will come and present to you here just shortly. If you have any questions about this zone change, I'd be happy to answer them now. Any questions for staff? Thank you, Hal. Mr. Chairman, members of the planning commission, this is the preliminary development plan that is associated with this zone change. And as Hal explained, let me be sure I hit, there we go. We have Todd's Road realignment, Codel Drive. Here is the old right-of-way of Todd's Road that currently serves as a driveway into the property. This is the area to be rezoned. You can see they're proposing an apartment building in this location and a considerable amount of green space as well on the property. This is the existing R3 property. And as Hal mentioned, it's a small piece of property. It's oddly shaped. So, you know, that presents challenges and certainly presented challenges. So you can see sort of a perimeter layout with their apartment buildings The parking in this area, the kiosk and a little bit of an island here to help direct the traffic flow and delineate that parking area. The variance is associated with the perimeter setback, particularly in this area. And again, the challenge of the site and Hal's going to elaborate on that, on that small site. And they're proposing 84 units with 102 parking spaces, though they're not particularly over-parking the site. And again, it's a challenge of this shape on these old remnant parcels like this that presents an obstacle sometimes to a layout on the property. As you all are aware, you've seen a lot of these now. So it was reviewed by your subdivision committee and recommended for approval. One interesting aspect is the old bit of right-of-way controlled by the state. That's a challenge. And it's going to be a challenge for this applicant to deal with, to clear that up. It just, the state handles things differently than we do locally when it comes to disposing of right-of-way. So they're very much aware of that. They've been looking at that and working through that. You will see a final development plan. So there will be no development of this property until, of course, that's worked out. And that will be handled at the time of your final development plan, which you will of course review and either approve or not. We think you will, but again, this is an affordable housing project. You will see a final on it and I'll answer any questions you may have for staff. Any questions for staff? Okay, yes, Robin. I understand that this is a preliminary development plan, but were there any discussions on the, so in this sort of use of the space, the green space is pretty much all chopped up what's left. Was there any discussion with them on where are they planning any sort of outdoor amenities that are usable or logical for the residents? On this preliminary plan, they don't indicate that. On the final development plan, I think we would explore that issue. Again, the challenge of the site impacts that to accommodate both the buildings, the parking, and dealing with the surrounding properties as well. So that is part of their challenge. And I'm sure they would be happy to elaborate on any plans they may have to address that issue. And was there a tree inventory done at the time that this preliminary plan was submitted? Pardon me? Has a tree inventory been done on the property? Yes. And could you go over the findings on that? The tree inventory? Yeah. I'd have to go take another look at it on the plan to actually see. generally the inventory describes existing species. There were no significant trees identified, as I recall, which is generally our concern. Hal just told me that he was aware that they met with the urban forester on site, and there were some trees in bad shape that are dying that will be removed. But a quick look. They've got the trees. No, they don't identify any significant trees. Double check this underneath now. All right. Oh, there is one. Here it is. It's green ash in poor condition. And as you know, our ash trees have been under attack as well with the borer. So they did identify one significant tree. The rest are primarily perimeter trees with your common species, cherry, hackberry, that sort of thing. Thanks. Thanks. Tom, I think that's all the questions for now. Thank you. Applicant? Applicant? Yeah, you're not. You do got a variance. Sorry, sir, I'll just quickly go through this. The applicant is requesting a reduction of the minimum project area perimeter. Essentially, it is the area for a group residential project that goes around to the outside of the project. This is meant to be 20 feet. During the review of many of these group residential projects, we are concerned about the buffering from the surrounding land uses. In this case, we set a start point of that 20 feet between the proposed buildings and any type of development nearby. The area of concern that the applicant is seeking to reduce is at this portion of the property. I'll zoom in just a little bit. Just looking at their site in a whole, there is this tapering effect in which you're going from front to back, in which it creates a unique shape on the site. The applicant is seeking to maximize this site for the use of affordable housing and to get all of their required parking as well as open space and the buildings that they are proposing at this location. They needed to shift those buildings over just a bit, 10 feet, to allow for a lot of that open space along the front of the buildings and then access over into their clubhouse space over at this location. In review of their letter of justification, staff was in agreement that because of the unique tapering of this site, as well as the need to have proper circulation, both for fire and EMS services, as well as for waste management, in which they do have their dumpsters located back in this location, that it would be appropriate or it would be approvable to reduce the perimeter setback from 10 feet along this location from 20 feet to 10 feet to allow them to have a little bit more wiggle room in the rear of their site. I will also point out that this area over here is actually the LFUCG Housing Authority's programmable space. It is not a residential building. It is more of their offices and management site. So the only area of single-family detached housing that is impacted by this 10-foot variance is located right here. And if we jump back over to the aerial photography of this site, you can see that these households that are located along this cul-de-sac are actually set a significant way off of the rear property line. That is really associated with some of the easements and utilities that run along the rear of the property. So staff, jumping back ahead, is recommending approval of the variance for the project exterior yard from 20 feet to 10 feet, as the 10 feet should not adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare of the surrounding land uses. The request arises from the unique characteristics of this site itself, that tapering element, and that the applicant has requested this prior to any construction or modification of the site. with all of our variances that we review it is incumbent upon the R3 being approved by the urban County Council that the development be constructed in accordance with their major development plan as mr. Martin presented and then all necessary permits shall be obtained by the various different divisions the action will be noted on the development plan for review in the future as well so So if you have any questions on this, I'd be happy to answer those. I've seen any. All right. Thank you. And you're up now. Now you're up now. Good afternoon, I'm Steve Garland with Prime AE. I'm the engineer representing AU. And I'm gonna take Mr. Penn's advice and when you have nothing that can add to Presentation like the staff just gave, I'll take any questions. Unless we got to do something, you guys bald heads. Any questions for the applicant? Not seeing it. Is there anyone in the audience that like to speak? Nope, okay. So we'll bring it back to the commission. Any further questions or concerns? If not, the floor is open for a motion. Remember we have a zone change, preliminary subdivision, and a variance request as well. Mr. Chair, I'd like to move to approve PLN MAR 22.6 For the reasons cited by staff, and can we do the variance at the same time? All right, do it separately. Separately. Okay, so we have a motion for the zone change and a second by Mr. Demovalon. Any further questions? Please vote via Granicus. Okay, that motion passes unanimously. Okay, Mr. Polk. I move to approve the variance request for the same application. We have a motion, seconded by Mr. DeMovillen. Please vote via Granicus. Motion passes unanimously. Yeah, Grant. Got one more. There's another one. Page three to bottom. C. Move to approve PLN NJDP 2223, Shadowwood Phase 2. Thank you. We have a motion and a second by Mr. DeMovillen. Please vote via Granicus. Motion passes unanimously. Thank you. See our next item on today's agenda appears under the commission items. It's on the top of page five, and it's a public facility request by the Bluegrass Community and Technical College specifically for their north campus expansion. The site is located on Newtown Pike at 690 Newtown Pike, and the current Bluegrass Community and Technical College is located south of Loudoun Avenue. This is going to be considered their north campus expansion, so it's actually on the north side of Loudoun Avenue. They are proposing today to show a new classroom building, expand their parking, and then also provide for a new vehicular access to the site. So a little bit more information on the aerial photograph. Here you can see this is the Lexington Fayette County Health Department to the south of their site. This is 690 Newtown Pike. To the east is the YMCA, Northside YMCA. to the west, a single-family residential neighborhood, and then to the north is the edge of the Lexmark property, which has been developed with some industrial uses, and they have frontage or very close to frontage on Freight Boulevard in this location. That's our aerial photograph, and you can see there are a few buildings on the subject property already. there's a an existing educational vocational building and then two or three other structures that are going to remain but aren't necessarily being used today by the Bluegrass Technical College the existing zoning is agricultural urban and that remains at this location dating back to the Eastern State Hospital when that was located along Newtown Pike. This is their site plan for the subject property and our north has moved. So north is now to the to the right side of the paper. So the access to Loudon would be on at this location. This is Newtown Pike frontage and then Freight Boulevard up here to the north but is on your the right hand side of the paper. the new building will be located up along newtown pike it'll be about 26 000 square feet also new parking associated with the classroom building and then these are again the buildings that will remain at this point for possible future use and or renovation and then also they could remove those and and build something else in the future one of the major improvements proposed on the site is this roundabout which will connect both the access from Newtown Pike in as well as the access from Loudoun and then a third new access to Freight Boulevard or West Road off of Freight Boulevard and again Freight Boulevard will have or does have an I believe an intersection with lighting on Newtown Pike so the the Bluegrass Community and Technical College is is is just bringing this forward to the Planning Commission in order to gain, I guess, a, not approval, but to acknowledge that it is in agreement with the Comprehensive Plan. So the staff did review their plan in association with their written summary from Carmen and Associates, and they acknowledged several goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, specifically providing for school sites. Obviously, this is a secondary education school site and providing for training in the Lexington area, as well as providing for a variety of job opportunities as people in our community move to gain training and knowledge for advancement in careers. also cited promoting pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and providing for community facilities which are well integrated. In addition to the comprehensive plan, this site is also located within our central sector small area plan. The location was identified as a semi-public or other semi-public use location in that small area plan. And at that time, BCTC had not moved to Newtown Pike yet in 2009. And so that small area plan had really sort of a generic reference to BCTC moving to that corridor and suggested coordination with BCTC in their planning efforts to ensure integration of their campus into the community. So as the staff reviewed this, there were a few things in terms of making sure it's in agreement with the comprehensive plan. that we believe that BCTC should review prior to getting to building permits. And those were in response to some of the criteria, place builder criteria, associated with a corridor place type and a non-residential development type, and specifically had to do with provision of a bike trail, or at least an access or an easement for a trail along Newtown Pikes to allow for there to be a connection back to the Legacy Trail. Provide for pedestrian connections from the trail to the proposed buildings directly. Also providing improvements to the trail crossing. And I'll go back where the BCTC is proposing their new access. this will cross the Legacy Trail. And so the transportation planning and MPO section suggested that this median either be extended or that some sort of refuge be provided for pedestrians in that general location to ensure that anyone walking or biking on the Legacy Trail has a protected area if they're crossing what would be a fairly wide access. And then lastly, the staff just recommended making sure that the design of the roundabout and associated pedestrian circulation was consistent with best practices for the geometry as well as safe crossings within the roundabout. So again, back to the roundabout, just making sure that this matches with what our best practice is and suggesting that the BCTC work with the transportation planning section to ensure that meets those standards. So the staff does believe this is in agreement with the comprehensive plan and just suggests that the BCTC make a few changes to ensure for safe access on the site. I don't need to answer any questions. And Chris Howard is here from Carmen and Associates. He's been working on the site planning. Is that correct? For the site. Mr. Mickler. Yeah. If this was a private development along a corridor, what would the guidance be on putting the stormwater detention along the corridor and also sort of angling the building away from the corridor? Not sure that there's any direction in terms of angling the building, but the suggestion is to put our structures up along the corridor and then parking to the rear. So if they could reorient the building, that might work better. But again, if that's the low spot on their site, you do always want your detention to work for you and move the water to the existing low spot where it can connect to other stormwater infrastructure. And so there's not, inherently in our sort of current guidance, there's not guidance away from these sort of pits along the main corridor. No, our place builder criteria doesn't designate locational standards for the stormwater basins. It does suggest using green infrastructure where possible. I'm just asking because along these drives, when you look at these stormwater basins, it's not exactly beautiful. Thank you. Those are my questions. We need to hear from that. He said he's good. I can answer any questions if you have questions, but I don't have anything to add to the presentation. Thank you. Mr. Polk? I do have a question related to Robin's question. To be blunt, I'm really troubled by sticking a building at an angle like that on a major corridor. I just feel like that's such a 1955 kind of thing to do and doesn't serve the urbanity of the location. And so that being said, I guess I'd like to understand why the building is turned at an angle, why it couldn't be addressing the corridor in a more meaningful way. I don't have a response to why the building is oriented the way it's oriented. I mean, it's kind of in keeping with the surrounding campus buildings, but I don't have, I mean, this is the plan that's been agreed to by BCTC after several iterations. We certainly can take back your and staff's recommendations for modifications. Thank you. So at this time, is there any other questions? So we don't take a vote on this. We just. The commission does usually actually vote to acknowledge that the request is supported by the comprehensive plan. Okay. All right. So, Mr. Penn? I move to recommend that this PFR 22 for Bluegrass Community Technical College does meet the conditions of the comprehensive plan. Okay. Thank you. We have a motion, do we have a second to that motion? Seconded by Mr. DeMovulian. Any further discussion? Seeing none, please vote via Granicus. Motion passes unanimously. Thank you, sir. Just a reminder for the commission, I apologize for the error on the agenda today. Training new staff, so we'll get there. With meetings for June coming up next week, we do have our subdivision and zoning committee meetings back in the Phoenix building on the third floor. And then our two hearings in June are June 9th and, as I mentioned earlier, the 23rd. We do have five Thursdays in June. And so we're scheduled to have two work sessions, June 16th and then also June 30th. I think that's it for me. Okay, that's it. Thank you. Well, not seeing anything. Anybody have anything to say? Great, meeting's adjourned. All right, thank you. you