# Planning Commission Subdivision (Sub) Committee - May 1, 2025 > Auto-transcribed civic record · Commission · May 1, 2025 - **Permalink**: https://meetings.lexingtonky.news/meeting/6417 - **Source video**: https://lfucg.granicus.com/player/clip/6417?view_id=14&redirect=true - **Date**: 2025-05-01 - **Body**: Commission - **Last revised**: March 26, 2026 - **Length**: 10,092 words - **Speakers**: Chair > ⚠️ **Auto-generated content.** Audio from the official Granicus video was auto-transcribed by OpenAI Whisper-1, with speaker labels folded in from Granicus closed-captioning. Structured facts were extracted with GPT-4o; the narrative summary was written by Anthropic Claude Sonnet. Speaker labels and verbatim wording may contain errors. See [methodology](https://meetings.lexingtonky.news/about/methodology) or [report a correction](mailto:editor@lexingtonky.news). --- ## Meeting Overview The Subdivision Committee convened on May 1, 2025, at 8:30 a.m. in the Phoenix Building, 3rd Floor Conference Room. The meeting covered a total of 10 agenda items, all related to subdivision and property matters across the Lexington area. No presiding officer is identified in the available meeting record, and no public comments were received during the session. The committee took 10 votes across the 10 agenda items. Of those, 9 items were approved, including properties associated with Lexington Center Corporation, Leestown Industrial Park, Hospitality Motor Inns (BP Oil Inc.), Schroyer Property, Shriners Hospital/Masonic Temple Association of Lexington, Covey Ridge Development, the Charles & Darlene Martha Property, and the Papert Property. One item — Lexmark International, Inc. Section 1, Lot 7 — was initially tabled before a subsequent motion on the same property was approved. No presentations were recorded as part of the meeting proceedings. ## Attendance All 17 members were present at the May 1, 2025 Commission meeting. No members were absent or late. **Present:** - Vaughan Adkins - David Filiatreau - Ben Cornett - Brooke Gray - Embry Beatty - Rob Poage - Scott Burton - Scott Thompson - Boyd Sewe - Craig Prater - Chris Dent - Traci Wade - Daniel Crum - Chris Chaney - Cheryl Gallt - Paula Schumacher - Tracy Jones ## Votes and Decisions The Commission took action on ten items at the May 1, 2025 meeting, with all motions carried unanimously. Madam Chair made each motion; no seconder is recorded in the data. - **PLN-MJSUB-25-00001** — The Commission unanimously approved the Lexington Center Corporation High Street Parking Lot Property subject to 12 attached conditions. [timestamp: 0:17:47] - **PLN-MJDP-24-00091** — The Commission unanimously voted to postpone the Lexmark International, Inc. Section 1, Lot 7 development plan due to outstanding conditions (26 conditions on record). [timestamp: 0:30:54] - **PLN-FRP-24-00029** — The Commission unanimously approved the Lexmark International Inc., Section 1, Lot 7 final record plat subject to 15 conditions. [timestamp: 0:37:35] - **PLN-MJDP-25-00019** — The Commission unanimously approved the Leestown Industrial Park, Unit 1, Block B, Lots 1A & 2 subject to 14 conditions. [timestamp: 0:40:57] - **PLN-MJDP-25-00020** — The Commission unanimously approved the Hospitality Motor Inns (BP Oil Inc.) development plan subject to 16 conditions. [timestamp: 0:48:14] - **PLN-MJDP-25-00021** — The Commission unanimously approved the Schroyer Property Lots 3 & 4 (Palomar Place) subject to 12 conditions. [timestamp: 0:51:24] - **PLN-MJDP-25-00022** — The Commission unanimously approved the Shriners Hospital/Masonic Temple Association of Lexington development plan subject to 13 conditions. [timestamp: 1:05:16] - **PLN-MJDP-25-00023** — The Commission unanimously approved the Covey Ridge Development, Lot 4 subject to 17 conditions. [timestamp: 1:10:16] - **PLN-MJDP-25-00024** — The Commission unanimously approved the Charles & Darlene Martha Property development plan subject to 17 conditions. [timestamp: 1:18:36] - **PLN-MJDP-19-00013** — The Commission unanimously approved an extension for the Papert Property. No conditions are recorded for this item. [timestamp: 1:25:39] No roll call votes were recorded; all actions were taken unanimously. Individual member votes for or against are not available in the record. ## Lexington Center Corporation High Street Parking Lot Property **Agenda Item:** PLN-MJSUB-25-00001 | [timestamp: 05:08] The Commission took up a discussion item concerning the Lexington Center Corporation High Street Parking Lot Property. The proposal before the Commission was to create five lots and depict a street layout for the subject property. - **Key Speaker:** Andrew Walls presented on this agenda item. - **Recommendation:** Approval was recommended with conditions prior to the Commission's consideration. - **Outcome:** The Commission approved the item. *Note: The available record for this item reflects the presentation and recommended approval with conditions. Specific details of any debate, individual conditions attached to the approval, or concerns raised during discussion are not reflected in the available data for this meeting.* ## Lexmark International, Inc. Section 1, Lot 7 **Case No. PLN-MJDP-24-00091** [timestamp: 18:21] The Commission took up this agenda item concerning a proposed amendment to the Lexmark International, Inc. development plan for Section 1, Lot 7. The amendment sought to revise the building parking and lotting layout for the site. Abby Jones presented the item to the Commission. Staff recommended postponement of the case due to outstanding conditions that had not yet been resolved prior to the meeting. The Commission ultimately tabled the item, consistent with staff's recommendation, pending resolution of the outstanding conditions. ## Lexmark International Inc., Section 1, Lot 7 **Case No. PLN-FRP-24-00029** [timestamp: 31:34] The Commission took up this agenda item involving a proposed reconfiguration of property boundaries on Lexmark International Inc.'s Section 1, Lot 7. Abby Jones presented the case to the Commission. The proposal calls for adjusting the existing property boundaries to consolidate the parcels into three lots rather than the current four. Staff recommended approval of the reconfiguration subject to conditions. The Commission approved the request as recommended. ## Leestown Industrial Park, Unit 1, Block B, Lots 1A & 2 **Case No. PLN-MJDP-25-00019** [timestamp: 38:19] The Commission took up a major development plan for Leestown Industrial Park, Unit 1, Block B, Lots 1A & 2. The plan was brought forward to depict a proposed structure and associated site improvements for the two lots. Greg Smorstad presented the item to the Commission. Staff recommended approval of the plan with conditions. The Commission approved the request with conditions. ## Hospitality Motor Inns (BP Oil Inc.) **Case No. PLN-MJDP-25-00020** [timestamp: 41:34] The Commission took up this discussion item concerning an amendment to the site plan for Hospitality Motor Inns (BP Oil Inc.). The amendment proposes the removal of an existing gas station and the construction of a new building in a different location on the same site. Scott Southall was the key speaker on this item. Staff recommended approval of the amendment with conditions. The Commission approved the item as recommended. ## Schroyer Property Lots 3 & 4 (Palomar Place) **Case No. PLN-MJDP-25-00021** [timestamp: 48:47] The Commission took up a discussion item concerning an amendment to depict the building and parking layout for Lots 3 & 4 of the Schroyer Property, located within the R-4 zone and identified as Palomar Place. - **Scott Southall** was the key speaker presenting on this item. - The amendment sought to establish the specific arrangement of buildings and parking areas for the two lots in question. - Staff recommended approval of the amendment with conditions. The Commission ultimately **approved** the item, consistent with the staff recommendation. No additional concerns, debate points, or dissenting positions are reflected in the available record for this agenda item. ## Shriners Hospital/Masonic Temple Association of Lexington **Case No. PLN-MJDP-25-00022** [timestamp: 1:04:38] The Commission took up this item involving a proposed amendment for the Shriners Hospital/Masonic Temple Association of Lexington. Scott Southall presented the case, which centered on a request to amend an existing development plan to: - Add an accessory drive-through facility - Revise parking configurations - Revise open space Staff recommended approval of the amendment with conditions, and the Commission ultimately voted to **approve** the request. No significant concerns or extended debate were noted in the available record for this item. ## Covey Ridge Development, Lot 4 **Agenda Item:** PLN-MJDP-25-00023 | [timestamp: 1:05:51] The Commission took up a discussion item concerning a proposed development on Lot 4 of the Covey Ridge Development. The plan calls for the construction of a facility intended for the indoor storage of large recreational vehicles. David Samacar was the key speaker on this item, presenting the proposal to the Commission. Staff recommended approval of the project subject to conditions. The Commission ultimately **approved** the application with conditions. *Note: The available record does not include detailed documentation of specific concerns raised, debate points, or the particular conditions attached to the approval. Readers seeking the full discussion are encouraged to review the meeting video beginning at the timestamp noted above.* ## Charles & Darlene Martha Property **Agenda Item:** PLN-MJDP-25-00024 [timestamp: 1:10:49] The Commission took up the application for the Charles & Darlene Martha Property, identified as case PLN-MJDP-25-00024. The proposal involved depicting the building layout, parking, and overall site arrangement for a commercial wood lot operation. Joseph Browning was the key speaker on this item, presenting the plan to the Commission for consideration. Staff recommended approval of the application with conditions. The Commission ultimately **approved** the item. ## Papert Property **Agenda Item:** PLN-MJDP-19-00013 [timestamp: 1:19:23] The Commission took up a discussion item regarding the Papert Property, with Rory Kaley serving as the key speaker on the matter. The item involved a request for reapproval of an existing plan to continue development of a mixed residential project, including single-family homes, townhomes, and apartments. Kaley presented the case for reapproval, which would allow the development to move forward under the previously established plan. The reapproval request indicated that the project had not yet been fully built out and required renewed authorization to continue progressing through its various residential components. The Commission ultimately approved the reapproval request for the Papert Property development plan. --- ## Decisions - **PLN-MJSUB-25-00001** — passed (0-0): Approval of Lexington Center Corporation High Street Parking Lot Property with conditions. - **PLN-MJDP-24-00091** — postponed (0-0): Postponement of Lexmark International, Inc. Section 1, Lot 7 due to outstanding conditions. - **PLN-FRP-24-00029** — passed (0-0): Approval of Lexmark International Inc., Section 1, Lot 7 with conditions. - **PLN-MJDP-25-00019** — passed (0-0): Approval of Leestown Industrial Park, Unit 1, Block B, Lots 1A & 2 with conditions. - **PLN-MJDP-25-00020** — passed (0-0): Approval of Hospitality Motor Inns (BP Oil Inc.) with conditions. - **PLN-MJDP-25-00021** — passed (0-0): Approval of Schroyer Property Lots 3 & 4 (Palomar Place) with conditions. - **PLN-MJDP-25-00022** — passed (0-0): Approval of Shriners Hospital/Masonic Temple Association of Lexington with conditions. - **PLN-MJDP-25-00023** — passed (0-0): Approval of Covey Ridge Development, Lot 4 with conditions. - **PLN-MJDP-25-00024** — passed (0-0): Approval of Charles & Darlene Martha Property with conditions. - **PLN-MJDP-19-00013** — passed (0-0): Approval of extension for Papert Property. --- ## Full transcript you you you you you you you you you you Welcome to the subdivision committee meeting for May. We'll go ahead and jump right in. All right, good morning. The first item on our agenda this morning, MJSUB 25-1 Lexington Center Corporation High Street parking lot property located at 371 South Broadway and 500 West High Street. On your plan to the top is High Street. Maxwell's along the bottom of the subject property and then Broadway is to the right side. This is Rupp Arena is just to the top of the plan there. The purpose of this plan is to create five lots and depict a street layout. We do you do have revised conditions in your your packet. We have sign offs for engineering, traffic engineering, landscape examiner, addressing, urban forester, environmental quality, bike ped, green space, and water quality. And then we have three say right yeah three remaining conditions after the the revisions. Number 10 provided the Planning Commission grants waivers for alternate cross sections. Number 11 provided the Planning Commission grants waivers for access spacing along West Maxwell Street and West High Street. And then number 12 was to discuss the access to South Broadway. The alternate cross sections there's a couple of the segments of the streets where they're proposing to not have sidewalks on both sides. One of those is along Lexington Center. On the right side of that as you look at the plan there are existing buildings and there's just not space for sidewalks. And then there's a couple other instances instances where there's not sidewalks on both sides but I'll let the applicant address those. And with that I'll open it up to you all for questions, comments. Any questions for staff? Thank you. Applicant? Thank you. I'm Andrew Walls with Gresham Smith, Civil Engineer for the project. So yes we talked about the sidewalks Lexington Center. So this is Lexity Live at the corner of High Street and Broadway and then there's a parking garage directly behind it. So we do not have any room for sidewalks along the right side of Lexington Center. And then same goes for the condition on Private Street D because of the condominiums and our road being so close in proximity to that we don't have room for sidewalks on the north side of Private Street D. We did add sidewalks on the south side so we have access from Broadway and then down Lot 3 to Maxwell. We met with the developer for Lot 4 yesterday and decided that we wanted to address the connectivity problem and I reached out to Scott to get his approval. So we do have a revision to this plan. Just wanted to bring it to your attention. So there is now sidewalk that connects to Private Street C. So we're going to have a crosswalk right here up the page. I started to hold my hand straight there. So we'll have a crosswalk here and then we'll have a 5 foot sidewalk on the back of the curb on Lexington Center. There's enough room there between the condominium building and our proposed curb and then we'll have a crosswalk to connect to Private Street C. We looked at the gradient in this area. It's very doable. So that's the connectivity we'll show. So we'll now have pedestrian access from South Broadway to Private Street C. I sent that on to Scott. He thinks that's a good change to the plan. So we have that included. That will be submitted before Planning Commission next week to get that on the final plan. The other waiver was for driveway connections. So there's an existing driveway connection to South Broadway here through the center of Lot 3. We're going to adjust that to the north. So we're actually going to improve that driveway separation from the intersection of Maxwell. Lexington Center driveway connection will remain the same. We made adjustments to align the curb to existing where we're showing that this is actually the rear of the proposed grocery store for Lot 4. So this is the loading dock area. So we've modified this to be a one way for trucks only out to Maxwell. So trucks will enter off of Lexington Center and High Street and come down to access the loading dock or they can access from South Broadway and then a left turn into the grocery loading dock there. So we've modified the driveway connections. We've added an additional one here for our main Spine Road. Patterson, we want to maintain the driveway connection off of Maxwell. So we're showing a private access easement through Lot 1, which will be a parking garage. So we're going to maintain that driveway connection and that existing left turn lane to that driveway off of Maxwell into Patterson. And then we're adjusting the driveway connection of Patterson on High Street and shifting that towards the west and the property boundary here. So that's our modification. So the driveway connections and the sidewalk only being on one side of the street for the cross sections. Is there any additional comments? Just a question. Yeah. My recollection is that a good chunk of this is going to be for housing. Is that right? Could you walk us through each of those lots and sort of tell us what the intent is? We've heard grocery store. Sure. So that is still to be finalized. We have a preliminary concept plan that we're not showing the final uses of each lot just yet, but preliminarily right now, Lot 4 would be the anchor tenant, the grocery store. Lot 1 would be a parking garage with retail on the front here, fronting our Spine Road. Lot 3 would be a multifamily development. Lot 2 would be a multifamily development with a parking garage in the center, so two buildings on either side and a parking garage. Lot 5 is kind of the mixed bag of hotel, multifamily, commercial, and retail space, so fronting the major Spine Road. So there's still some things to work out. Architect and developer are working through those numbers to finalize the final development, so it's not, nothing's official just yet. That's okay. But that's where we're headed, yeah. On your Spine Road, where it comes out on South Broadway, will there be enough usage of that to have to be a signal? So South Broadway connection right here for Private Street D? No, I'm not aware of that. What I'm trying to do is to figure out how you get from South Broadway to Spine Road. Is it that alley goes through there? Through this connection here? Yes. So that is the connection through Private Street D. This is the back of the grocer. So this primarily is going to be accessed for this residential unit here. There is an existing signal for Lexington Center off of High Street, so primarily flow will be through Lexington Center Drive, and then the primary would be the Spine Road as well. That would be the main access point to the development that would facilitate vehicles and pedestrians to access each of the lots. So that was another topic to discuss on South Broadway. We had previously showed a left turn there. We went ahead and striped that condition because we don't want to promote that as an everyday movement, turning movement. So that would only be utilized on game day through controlled access through police or whatever security for the lot would direct traffic on a left turn movement on South Broadway. So that's where we show that left turn. It also provides us with a widened up movement for trucks to turn in at that point. Thank you. I've got one question. Problem not really to remain to you, but knowing that all of that has been for Rupp Arena parking in the past, where will that parking go, do you think? Yeah, so there's an agreement to maintain parking throughout the phase construction, which is why lot one is the parking garage that will be developed first. So there will be three garages on the site, one on lot one, lot two, and lot five that will add parking from what's existing. Right now there's about 1,700 spaces on the lot for Rupp Arena and also the Hyatt Hotel parking up here. All of that will be added back and more for the development because obviously I'm sorry, there will need to be parking for the people that live there for the apartments and then also the grocery store will have their own parking, hotel and such. So there will be a drastic increase in parking. So once this is built out, so to speak, they will still be available parking for Rupp Arena? Yes, that's the plan. Just curious. Yeah, and I'll comment that we've seen an interim plan for basically a new striping plan for the existing parking lot and then so that'll increase the spaces and so that when they go to start constructing the parking garage, it'll still be basically, I think what you have to maintain a minimum the entire time. So exactly, yeah, LCC has a minimum they must maintain throughout the process. So yep, thank you, David. I really got a different answer than I was expecting, but that's good. Yeah, that's all to be finalized, but they're multi-level garages and there'll be three of them. So there'll be a significant amount of parking. We also have a traffic consultant involved that's going to do all the traffic analysis at all the entry points. That's a big concern for us is how we accommodate on a game day, everyone that lives there, everyone that's shopping there. Where is everyone going to go? We want to officiate or make it as efficient as possible to get people in and out of the site. Okay, sounds good. Any other questions for the applicant? All right, thank you. Thank you. Do we have any public comment? Okay, being none, we'll bring it back to the committee. Madam Chair, I move for approval of PLN MJSUB 25-1, Lexington Center Corporation, with the now 12 attached conditions. Okay. It's on. We can hear you. Miss Paula will come over here and she'll survive. She'll get that taken care of. So we're going to move down the agenda to the next plan, which is PLN MJDP 24-91. And if you look in your package, you'll also find revised conditions on this. This is for Lexmark International, Company Section 1, Lot 7. This property, this property is located off of Setzer Way. Setzer Way, let's see here, Setzer Way comes through up here to Freight Boulevard, which then takes and leads us over to Newtown. But if you follow Setzer Way, which is a private street, it'll take you down here to Loudon Avenue. So this is the property within this whole development. We'll zoom in here. They are proposing, they've come back in and we have taken it from four lots. Now they're proposing three lots with a building here on this front one. You can see the dash lines where they're wanting to remove that and create a larger building across this way. And then we have a third lot over here, which we have a two-story office warehouse over on the third lot. So with this revision, because they had proposed four buildings previously with four lots, and now they're combining one lot or combining two lots to make one. So now we're three buildings on three lots. So this is revising it. They're adding square footage to the buildings. So with that, the first 12 conditions are our typical sign-offs with everybody included, engineering, traffic, landscape, addressing, forester, environmental quality, bike, green space, fire, waste management, divisional water quality, U.S. Postal Service. Then we had some cleanup conditions. Improve legibility, shading, and some color because some colors do not reproduce in black and white. So we want to make sure that they have a lot of color on here, but sometimes like the yellow won't reproduce that. So we need to make sure that we get it where it can be reproduced. Denote no outdoor storage on lot 7D until approval of the amended final development plan. When they first came in, they were talking about having outdoor storage here on lot 7D. That's why they're going to have an office here. So we want to make sure that should they decide that they want to have outdoor storage, they make sure that they have the correct paving, asphalt paving for it to have equipment stored out there. Remove consolidation lines from plan face. We only want to see the property boundaries. Clarify lot coverage and building square footage and site statistics. They're adding the second floor to all of these buildings, so therefore that increases your square footage. So we want to make sure we have those numbers corrected. Clarify all site statistics for vehicular landscaping. I went through several of them and they didn't come out to the right totals at the end. So we want to just make sure that's done. Denote planning commission action on a waiver from the final record plan. We'll have a final final record plan here. We'll show shortly that they're doing a continued discussion on it because this is where they were creating four lots and they're coming back and they're wanting to do three lots and they're wanting to revise the access driveway that that you all had approved previously when it was four lots and like I said they're converting it now into three. So we want to make sure we have that note on the plan. Denote the release of the sanitary sewer and storm sewer easements prior to plan certification. We have several easements that are running through buildings and we want to make sure that those are removed prior to construction because we don't want to have that conflict. Clean up text written over text. Some of the text is over top of other text. Therefore it makes it hard to read some of the numbers. So we want to make sure that this is kind of cleaned up so that we don't have any problems and also improves plan legibility when you have numbers written over numbers. It makes it harder to see. Provide lighting plan per article 30 of the zoning ordinance. That's a new requirement. We need to have that. Denote location of parking for lot 7d. They're calling for this 7d to be an office warehouse. So if you have an office you typically have one parking space for your office. So we just want to have it denoted. Resolve timing of the plat recordation which is the one we're just talking about as far as continued discussion. Correct. Note number 40. Discuss note number one in the site statistics box for outdoor storage on lot 7d. It was kind of a unique note so we just wanted to have it discussed. It says natural trees save is provided for outdoor storage area asphalt which is not considered BUA. So I'm not quite sure what it means. We need to have that clarified. Discuss lack of landscape islands on the southeast side of building 7a, lot 7a and non-compliance with article 18-3. As you can see there's landscape islands on most of the property here up along the top here but for whatever reason we do not have any landscape islands on the portion on the back portion here of this what shows of this building. So that's a new part of the zoning ordinance that we have those and it's required in the zone because this is office space and warehouse. So we require that. So if there's any other comments or questions. Any questions for staff? They currently have they currently have a development plan that they can pull a grading permit on. So that's fine. So that gives them the ability to go in there and do the work to create the new access easements to go around the buildings because that's what they're wanting to do is to take this access easement and reroute it around the building. So with the current development plan they can get a grading permit because it's signed so that they can do start the work to do the new sewer line and while they're doing that then they can work through the process through the council to get this one released. And so then once we're finished then they can come back and create the new easement. Yeah we don't want to have buildings over we don't want them over any easements truthfully. Cheryl you're still in postponement mode on this? Yeah there's still some questions on some of the things. The applicant's here so maybe she can help but we're just kind of concerned on a couple different issues. Okay all right. Thank you. Applicant? Morning. Abby Jones. Abby Jones Consulting. We got Cheryl's updated comments yesterday late afternoon and I believe we'll be able to take care of those and get those back to Cheryl to her satisfaction probably tomorrow. So I think that we're pretty close. We were able to talk before the meeting to understand what she was looking for on a few of the items. So I believe we've been able to get through those items. I'm trying to think of anything else that is just worth mentioning besides the fact that we're going to clean up or adjust numbers and charts because that's what most of these are is adjusting little numbers and charts. I believe the one specific thing on number 25 will remove that note and on number 26 your request is to add islands there so we'll add four islands since that's a new requirement. And we're glad to add two parking spaces on number 22 as well. So all of those things were fine to to address. I guess I would also mention on number 19 new number 19 it's only a release of sanitary sewer not storm. And we have we have that on a new version and a new note that we'll have for Cheryl tomorrow. So again we're glad to address these to Cheryl's satisfaction here shortly. So I just want to clarify it's not Cheryl's satisfaction it's the ordinance requirements. Correct. So I don't want to mislead everyone to think Cheryl's like in charge of just making a list for you to correct. It's it's on it's the ordinance that requires these things. So landscape islands on the southeast side of the building you have none. We weren't sure if there was overhead door access or if there was some other reason why you didn't have landscaping. There are significant numbers of overhead doors on that side. But we were able to shift and adjust some things to be able to have four islands which I believe would meet your requirements. So you well you also have to meet the 10 percent. So in your site statistics you're not showing that you meet the 10 percent. You're at about two and a half percent. So it could be that you need bigger islands or more to meet the 10 percent. This is where some specific notes rather than just saying meet article 18 is sometimes helpful to be able to just understand exactly which section. But we're glad to make sure that the 10 percent is adjusted. Right so we I mean we want to encourage the design professionals to you know have a conversation. We'll have find the the space on their plan where they can fit that in as opposed to the staff saying you need four islands and they need to be 200 square feet each and then you know what I mean. Like we can't do that level of review for you. That's really your. I'm not asking for that purview. Yes. Yeah. Cheryl says in the background mark the overhead doors. So there's one I said typical and then there was a symbol for it. But maybe it's hard to read because we're having to show such a large plan. We'll make that more clear. Okay any questions? Okay Frank. There is no storm going under the buildings. Correct. No. No we have 14 easements on the property that we've managed to avoid all but one. All right. I'll take that compliment. Okay any other questions for the applicant? All right thank you. Any public comments? Okay we'll bring it back to committee. Madam Chair considering the work still needs to be done. Sounds like they are working though. My recommendation is going to be for postpone and plan MJDP 24-91 Lexmark International with the still or now revised 26 conditions. Okay I'm going to go ahead and skip up to the plat. So this will be plan FRP 24-29 Lexmark International. So let me go through here and find the plat. It's probably one of the last handouts you had. Yes there's revised conditions on it. Oops there we go. Here we are. Yeah Frank there's a handout too. It's just it's probably at the back of the packet. Back of the packet. We just thought it would be easier to review them both at the same time here. Did you find it? All right. Okay so you can see this is Setzer Way. Whoops what did I do? I held the button too pressed it too many times. This is Setzer Way. Here's Loudon Avenue. Like I said here's lot 7a, 7b, and 7d here. 7c anyway. This is where you can see that they had the four lots. One, two, three, four. So now they're having three. One, two, three. This when you have a record plat, a record plat can reconfigure the property boundaries. So we don't need to show the consolidation information because that's on a minor plat. But for a major plat all you have to final record plat to show the reconfiguration of the property boundaries. So that's really what they're doing here is reconfiguring the property boundaries on the property so that they can create three lots instead of four. So again we have our typical sign-offs. Engineering traffic, landscape address, forester, environmental quality, bike, the utilities. We like to have all utility sign-offs. Documentation from water quality, U.S. Postal Service. Then we have a few cleanup conditions. Addition of the length of the street frontage and the site statistics and remove the acreage and right-of-way dedication. Street frontages, street frontage of each lot. You know what they have on the street. And so the lots back here, this lot back here will not have street frontage but this lot here will have street frontage along Setzer and then this lot here will have street frontage along Setzer. So that's typically when we ask for street frontage. We just want to know what the length of the street is at the front of the property. Then this is a private and I received an email yesterday speaking with Mr. Greg Smorstad and he said that they are still working through the process to have this dedicated to a public street. So that's still a private street at this moment. So that's why it's not right-of-way dedication either. So I just wanted to clarify that. Then cleanup, update purpose of amendment to subdivide one lot into three lots. Remove consolidation notation from plan phase. Correct street name and the purpose of the amendment. Ms. Jones has worked with addressing and they've renamed the street to Foundation. They have this access easement. They've renamed it now from McGee Court to Foundation Way. So in the purpose of the note, they talked about the easements and they talked about McGee Court. Well, it's no longer that. We want to make sure we have the right name in the sites in the purpose of amendment note. Provided Planning Commission grants a waiver of exhibit 6-3, which is the street cross-section for the access easement that they have. They want to take it from a 40-foot wide to a 30-foot wide. So I will have a report for you guys at the Planning Commission meeting about the waiver. So with that, I'll open it to you all to see if there's any other things. You have any comments or questions? You have something? Okay. All right. Any other questions for staff? All right. We'll hear from the applicant. Hi there again. Thank you for letting us have these back-to-back. It just makes a lot more sense. I think the one item that is worth mentioning besides updating a few things, charts and words, which of course we're glad to do, is just mentioning that on the waiver, we have some steep slopes and some very large power poles and also a gas easement. That's a 10-inch transmission line and an underground. So two underground easements and one above ground easement that are limiting factors for the road location. And so we provided a graphic for that with our request for that. I think that will be helpful in explaining why we have that limitation. Any other questions? Any other questions for the applicant? All right. Thank you. Thank you. Okay. Any public comment? All right. We'll bring it back to the committee. Thank you. Madam Chairman, I move for approval of PLN FRP 2429 with the revised 15 conditions. The motion has been made and properly seconded. All those in favor? Aye. Opposed? All right. Moving along on the agenda. The next plan is MJDP 25-19, Leestown Industrial Park Unit 1, Block B, Lots 1A and 2. This is located at 2405 and 2409 Merchant Street. The purpose of this plan is to depict the proposed structure and associated site improvements for Lot 1A and 2. This site's located, this is Leestown Road. This is Merchant Street. It's a cul-de-sac. They're proposing a structure there with associated parking. I believe it's for a dentist office. You do have revised conditions in your packet. We have 12 standard sign-offs including engineering, traffic engineering, landscape, addressing, urban forester, environmental quality, bike ped, green space, division of fire, waste management and water quality and a postal service. There are two remaining conditions from the original staff conditions. Remove shading and provide separate open space exhibit in compliance with Article 20 of the zoning ordinance and provide a lighting plan for Article 30 of the zoning ordinance. And with that, I'll open it up to you all for questions or comments. All right. Any questions for staff? All right. Applicant. Thank you. Good morning. My name is Greg Smorstad with Banks Engineering and we're okay with the two conditions. I guess we want to go ahead and remove vegetated area from the plan also. Just show it on open space. Is that correct? Is that what you mean by remove the shading? Yeah. Okay. Yep. We can do that and we are working on the lighting plan now. So. All right. Sounds great. All right. Any other questions for the applicant? Thank you. We have any public comment? No. Okay. Being done, let's bring it back to committee. Madam Chair, I move for approval of PLNMJDP 2519 with the attached 14 conditions. All right. Then motions remain in second. All in favor? Aye. All right. Moving along. Next plan, MJDP 25-20 Hospitality Motor Ends BP Oil Incorporated located at 2115 and 2143 North Broadway. The purpose of this amendment is to depict the removal of the existing gas station and construction of a new building in a different location on the site. So this plan is located. This is the exit ramp for Interstate 64 and 75 on to North Broadway. This is Judy Lane up here. The site, the subject site is the existing BP station. And what they're proposing is to remove the existing building and to relocate it on the north side of the property. The canopy will remain where it is now. And they have existing fuel tanks that they're not proposing to move. Let's see. We do have 12 standard sign-offs including engineering, traffic engineering, landscaping, addressing, urban forester, environmental quality, bike ped, green space, division of fire, division of waste management, division of water quality, and the postal service. And then we have to denote all buildings, pavings, signs, fences, walls, and retaining walls that are depicted, described or required. What? Nope, no? Okay, sorry. The building inspection note. And then to denote building line along interstate frontage, correct purpose of amendment to match staff report, discuss use of vehicle rental operation which is not permitted in a B5P zone, and to discuss potential pedestrian connection to existing sidewalk along North Broadway. The number 16 we did discuss at Tech and the applicant indicated that they won't have the rental operation. It won't continue. And then in regard to the building line, they do show a 20-foot utility and landscape buffer easement, but they're building, this is their frontage along the exit ramp, and so we just wanted them to add that as the 20-foot building line as well. So just kind of a cleanup thing on that. And with that, I'll open it up to you all for questions, comments. I've got a question. So they're, presently they're operating a rental unit in a B5P? Uh, U-Haul. Yeah, correct. Okay, thank you. This maybe should go to the applicant, but I'll go ahead and ask it. So they're keeping the fuel canopy, they're keeping the tank, so they're still operating a gas station there. They're just building a larger building for their operations. Is that like a convenience store? Correct. You guys hang out there? It's been a long time. Chris? Yes. Hospitality and motor inns. Are we talking about just the BP station at this point? It's, yeah, for this. Not the hotel? Yeah, this amendment is just for this site. Okay. Yeah. Did you have a question about the hotel too? Mr. Southall might be able to answer it. I know, they're in and out. All right. Any other questions for staff? All right, we'll hear from the applicant. Yeah. Good morning. Scott Southall, EarthCycle Design, representing the applicant for this development plan. And we're good with all the conditions and have already started to address, as Chris mentioned, several of them. All right. Any questions for the applicant? No, sir. It's a separate owner. Yes, sir. It is a separate piece of property. The reason that is on the development plan is because those three lots were originally on the, yes, the, these three lots up top were on the development plan. So, yes, yes. So, the BP, the hotel, and the outlot here were a part of the development plan. Yeah. Okay. Any other questions for the applicant? Doesn't appear so. Thank you. Thank you. Do we have any public comment? Being done, we'll bring it back to committee. All right. Motion has been made and seconded. All in favor? Unanimous. Thank you. All right. We're going to move down the agenda. We're going to go to PLNMJDP25-21 Shroyer property. You'll find revised conditions on this plan. We got a lot of revisions this month. We did a good job. Okay. This property is located, you're going to go out to Harrodsburg Road, Wellington Way. We have our Panera over here. This is a corner lot. We've seen this come through a couple different times. They're coming back in with an apartment building here. So you'll have access, you'll come off Palomar Center Drive, have access into the parking lot. You know, you go Palomar Center Drive and it'll go over here to Palomar Center Shopping Center. So with that, you can see that on this revised conditions, they did clean up a lot of stuff. So the first 11 are clean up or our standard conditions, engineering, traffic, landscape, addressing, forester, environmental quality, bike, green space, fire, waste management, and U.S. Postal Service. They have one condition left. It's provide outdoor lighting plan per Article 30 of the Zoning Ordinance. Other than that, everything else has been cleaned up. OK. That's great work. All right. Any questions for staff? All right. Applicant? Good morning. Scott Southall. EarthCycle Designed again. We're good with the conditions. And I will add that yesterday, we also got addressing resolved. So. Wonderful. Thank you for working through those. Well, I like to thank staff for working with us and getting through these and resolving them too. Now, this is what we like to see. OK. All right. Any other questions for the applicant? All right. Thank you. Thank you. Any public comment? All right. Let's bring it back to the committee. Second. All right. Motion has been made and seconded. All in favor? We are unanimous. OK. We're going down the agenda. We're heading to MJDP 2522 Shriners Hospital, Masonic Temple Association of Lexington. We spend a lot of time over here. This is out. All right. So we're going to go out Harrodsburg Road. Over here is this is Fountain Blue that connects up over here to where our Publix is because Man of War is here. So down Harrodsburg Road, we're coming in here. Last month, we talked about a convenience store here and a car wash here. Now, because they lost Tupelo Honey. Yeah. So because of the storm, from what I understand, the storm kind of took out some of their money so that they can't increase or something like that. So anyway, so what we're going to do now is, where we have this big patio area, we're going to take and make a drive-thru for our graders ice cream. So you can see where currently there's some currently they're showing people coming from this direction and people coming from this direction. And me personally, I'm not going to let somebody cut in front of me for ice cream. So with this, they have revised conditions. We have the first 11, our typical sign-offs, engineering, traffic, landscape, addressing, forester, environmental quality, bike ped, green space, fire, waste management, the postal service. I agree, they have a lighting plan from the previous plan that they're working on right now. We're still working to get that finalized. But we need to have that copied again in this plan. So we want to make sure we have it in this folder too. And then we have resolved drive-thru facility circulation and stacking. This is something we talked about and we were a little concerned at the tech committee because you have people that are going to come around this way and you have people that are going to, whoops, go back. And you have people that are going to come around this way. And like I said, I'm not letting anybody cut in front of me for ice cream. So definitely. So that's why we asked and I think traffic was in on this. We were kind of concerned over having two folks lapsing trying to come in because this car here is going to be blocking somebody who's going to be trying to get through either direction. So we left that as a resolve through this plan. So with that, I'll open it to you all to see if there's any other comments or questions. Any questions for staff? Well, I'm going to let Mr. Where are the people coming from the top coming to make a left-hand turn? Where are they over? He shows it coming from the left. I was just going to say, can we do signage saying, you know, access only this way for ice cream? You know. So you I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I As far as I'm concerned, I would say leave it as a discuss item, see if they can figure it out and bring it to us next week. Is that OK? Madam Chair, I'll move for approval of plan MJDP 25-22 Shriners Hospital Masonic Temple with the wonderful revised conditions, 13 revised conditions, change in number 13 to discuss drive-through facility and circulation. Check. All right, all right. Next plan on the agenda, MJDP 25-23 Covey Ridge Development Lot 4, located at 125 Canebrake Drive. The purpose of this plan is to construct a facility for indoor storage of large recreational vehicles. This is the final development plan we recently saw that I went out to with a zone change to I-1. So this is located, this is I-75 out here. Athens Boonesboro comes in and then Canebrake comes up and curves around the subject property. The applicant's proposing a 5,800 square foot building for the storage of large recreational vehicles with the associated drive and paved area for circulation. Let's see. We have 12 standard sign-offs, engineering, traffic, engineering, landscaping, addressing, urban forester, environmental quality, bike pedigree, green space, division of fire, division of waste management, division of water quality, USPS, and then buildings, then our additional conditions, the building inspection note, and the number 14 include note 15, going out again, note 15 from the preliminary development plan, depict pedestrian connection to sidewalk, along Canebrake Drive, number 16, light and contour lines for clarity, and 17 is to provide a lighting plan in compliance with Article 30 of the zoning ordinance. I'll open it up to you all for questions, comments. The zone change is complete, and I believe they have the second reading in front of them. And also, the preliminary plan's been certified, and so this is just the final plan. All right. Any other questions for staff? Yes. I just want to point out there are two things that interest me. I just want to point out there are two things that engineering's going to be looking out for our sign-off, and that's just they're going to need to do an overall study for the development because they're encroaching into a stormwater management area, and then they have a dump station for the RVs, which is really close to that stormwater management area that we'd like to look at more closely. So is that covered in here? It can be part of our sign-off. I just wanted to bring it to your attention. Okay. Yeah, and you do have that in your comments in a cell, correct? Yeah. Okay, good. All right. Any other questions for staff? Thank you. Applicant? David Samacar with DNJ Realty. No issues with the items that are on the list. As we said, we just got the zone change approval, so we're waiting on that to start making the adjustments to our plan for final submittal. I did want to mention that you had mentioned last time the sinkholes potential on site. I went back and looked at the USGS thing, and it was retention basins that they identified as sinkholes, so I don't know. Yeah, that was an anomaly, because one day they showed up as LIDAR sinkholes, and then the next time I looked, they weren't on there. I didn't do it. Somebody else corrected it. You're aware of what Ms. Atkins talked about? Yes. All right. Any questions for the applicant? Thank you. Any public comment? All right, let's bring it back to committee. Okay, Madam Chair, I move for approval of PLN-MJDP-2523, Covey Ridge Development, Lot 4, with the attached 17 conditions. Motion's been made. Second? Chair. All right, we're going to move down the agenda. We're going to go to MJDP-2524, Charles and Darlene Martha property. You'll find revised conditions in your packet. This property is located out Georgetown Road. We have Citation Boulevard down here, Innovation Drive, and then we come out Georgetown before we get up here to Spur and Kearney Ridge subdivision. There's a piece of property here that is for industrial, and I think Jim and Rose's is up here somewhere. The bar, so it's up that close. They're proposing to have a wood lot, so they're going to have an office here with parking. They're going to have access off of the service road that runs parallel to Georgetown Road to get into the property. They are going to do wood lots, storage of, I guess, mulch and that sort of thing in the back here. So with that, we have our typical sign-offs, engineering, traffic, landscape, addressing, forager, environmental quality, bike peg, green space, fire, waste management, division water quality, U.S. Postal Service. We have still a few conditions. They did a good job in doing some cleanup here. Denote landscaping to the Georgetown Road corridor landscape buffer. We need to have a note added to the plan. You know, they make reference to Article 18 and Article 6-10 in the subregs, so we need to make sure that it's also noted that there's a Georgetown Road corridor plan that they have to follow. Depict sidewalk on plan face to match street cross-section. They show, we always ask for a sidewalk to go out to the street, so they're showing the sidewalk out to the street, and then they have it just turned here. We need to show it across the total frontage of the property. That way, when adjacent properties come in, they have to build their sidewalk to their property line, and that way, that's how we get our sidewalks along the roads. Then, on the back, the approved lighting plan in compliance with Article 30. They did submit something, but I have not had a chance to review it against our checklist to make sure it meets all the requirements. Denote the review recommendations from the Royal Springs Wellhead Protection Committee. My understanding, they went to that meeting a couple days ago with Tracy, and so we need to have any notes that they made with that plan, and then resolve compliance with Article 6-3 and denote asphalt or concrete pavement. Per Article 16-3, it states that the parking area and driveway shall be paved with concrete, asphalt, brick pavers, suitable hard surface materials, and so right now, they are showing asphalt millings, and when they went and took this to the Royal Springs, they weren't real, I don't think they were in agreement with this. I think they want to see asphalt paving. I know they said that they're going to have large trucks moving, so maybe they do a concrete with a thicker base, but we require all drive areas to be asphalt or concrete, so we need to have that changed here from asphalt millings. They said they've used it elsewhere, but the Royal Springs was not in favor of that, so with that, I'll open it to you all to see if there's any other comments or questions. Any other questions? Driveways, yeah. Well, that's my, I mean, I would think you would want to have a solid surface instead of something that's going to be like gravel or millings, because when you go to scoop up mulch, you're going to be scooping up half of that, too, so my thoughts or understanding would be that it all be storage, would all be asphalt or concrete. Yeah, well that, yeah, it's under storage, under that type of materials, yes. Anybody else? The applicant's here, he can answer some questions for you. Okay, thank you. All right, applicant. Good morning, Joseph Browning with Contour Collaborative. The owner of this property, or the developer, is Dave Leonard, a tree specialist, so their current operation is on Old Frankfort. Moving this into town allows them to bring all their work they do on trees around town to a more local spot to bring that to the back of this property and process those trees and shrubs and all the stuff they rip out all over town into mulch they can reuse locally. The discussion that's ongoing with the pavement section is because that back half, the dirty half of this site, the front half is all totally good asphalt pavement, parking lot. Those are bins at the bottom in those squares so that they can sell decorative rock. And the mulch that they make, the back dirty half of the site is where there's large wheel loaders that have the big bucket on the front and load trees of large quantities into a mulcher machine and produce those mulch piles that they stockpile in rows there. So that building in the back is a shop for them to park those items. As discussed, the asphalt section, that's something that's in our court to provide maybe a revised section of what that construction is to engineering and traffic because the initial investment of a full asphalt section is still sacrificial for the weight of those vehicles. And so the owner would prefer to use millings as part of that section because when the asphalt does break down, instead of scooping up gravel that's under the asphalt, the millings are a finer material, they can still scoop their buckets across it. And that's how they're currently operating off of Old Frankfort Pike. So that item will remain to be resolved until we have those further discussions about what that section exactly is and have that approved with this process. Do we have any questions for the applicant? I think that they mix some sand into it, but nothing's there to rot or wait till the worms get in it kind of composting process. This is just hardwood mulch that's been replaced in beds and landscape areas. Any other questions for the applicant? It doesn't sound like it. Thank you. Any public comment? All right, we'll bring it back to committee. Can we get a motion? 17 conditions. All right, motion made in second. All in favor? We're unanimous. And with that, I'll take my leave. Thank you. OK, Cheryl, what's next? Help us, please. Well, we're going to go down the agenda. Remember Papert property? Out here off of Spur Road. Out off of Spur Road and Greendale over here. We were just over here off of Georgetown's out this way. This is a mixed use of townhomes and I believe a little bit apartments over in this area. They are coming back and asking for reapproval of this plan. The last time it was approved was in April of 21. And so they have five years to build from it. And so they're coming back to ask for reapproval so that they can, I guess, start construction. We'll let the applicant explain. But since it was already approved, we would just go with the previous conditions with approval. Cheryl, we might need to update the parking areas. OK. All right. And just to, OK. Well, I mean, the landscape requirements have changed. Yes. So I guess we'll. Is it expired? An extension is only a year. So then you'd have to start and have your have significant work done in that year. That's it. He does not want to start over with all the new rules, which is why we're here. One thoroughly. Hello. Rory Kaley with EA Partners here on behalf of Pepper Properties. We are requesting an extension. It was approved twice. It was April and June of 25 years ago. It was certified April 21. Since that time, we've been working with state encroachment permits. We've got the land disturbance permit. They've done the clearing of the site. We just haven't gotten past that. I believe we also have the state sewer approval. Oh, yeah, that was resolved as well. Yeah. Did you resolve the pump station? I can ask and tell you next week. I don't know. There's a pump station on site that's supposed to go off with under the railroad borings is what I remember from five years ago. Yeah, there was an easement issue that was being resolved. And if that didn't get resolved, then the pump station is going to be relocated rather than a capital project sewer line. You don't have to answer that. Okay. I know what we're talking about now. All right. Yeah. Is it one of your other clients? Maybe that helps. It wouldn't be mine. That would be the issue. I don't believe. No names. I'm on a microphone. You can recommend approval. Yeah. Approval of the extension. Yeah. Usually an extension means they've started on grading. Sorry. They've done some work on the property. So the subregs want to explain what an extension is for. Make sure that you're meeting that. Nosiness because I wasn't around here five years ago. What's going on in there? Oh, this one's really busy. Single family homes, townhomes, apartments. It's all housing. Yes. Okay. Single family here in the rear of this on a grid pattern with alley systems. This is Dennis Anderson. So it's a lot like sharky property. Townhouses out front along this area and a clubhouse entrance. And then over here, environmental creek. And on the far side of that, we've got the apartment. It is dense. Yeah. You are continuing the shared use path that the adjacent properties. Mostly building on the north side on this property side. Or is that before? Because I know Barlow had to build the half room and they're building shared use path on the north side. I think it terminates before the before the railroad. Yes. I believe we just have a sidewalk in our cross for a road. Yeah. The houses were supposed to front. We had a real urban looking section of the state to change their mind. Finally, where I believe they let us get a sidewalk and make it look urban as opposed to, you know, for years we've been doing the rural section out there. Anything else from anyone? So this would be for an extension. Do we have a motion? Speak up. Motion has been made and seconded for approval. Recommendation of approval of the extension for plan in J.D.P. 19 dash 13 properties. All in favor. Please say aye. Up. Good work. Good work, Rory. So we do have a motion for approval and seconded. All in favor. Please say aye. Any opposed. Thank you. Thank you. Next. All right. Next on our agenda. And this is more of just kind of an update. M.J. D.P. 25 dash one G.D.K. Farm LLC, the Turner property located at 5447 Tate's Creek Road. This had been previously recommended for approval, but the applicant had postponed a couple of times for various reasons. And then they have they came back with a revised plan on it. The 28th. So we've got some revised conditions. Do we can. We have the 12 standard sign offs and then a few remaining cleanup amends this. I mean, the site statistics to utilize the standard site statistics box provide a lighting plan. Oh, and then there's also a waiver request for a lighting plan for the 20th. And so that's kind of the update. And then the next item is the. The next item is the. The next item is the. The next item is the. The next item is the. The next item is the. The next item is the. The next item is the. The next item is the. The next item is the. The next item is the. The next item is the. Next item is the. The next item is the. Next item is the. The next item is the. The next item is the. The next item is the. The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the The next item is the