# Water Quality Fees Board - July 23, 2026 > Auto-transcribed civic record · Board · July 23, 2026 - **Permalink**: https://meetings.lexingtonky.news/meeting/6836 - **Source video**: https://lfucg.granicus.com/player/clip/6836?view_id=14&redirect=true - **Date**: 2026-07-23 - **Body**: Board - **Last revised**: July 23, 2026 - **Length**: 5,537 words > ⚠️ **Auto-generated content.** Audio from the official Granicus video was auto-transcribed by OpenAI Whisper-1. Structured facts were extracted with GPT-4o; the narrative summary was written by Anthropic Claude Sonnet. Speaker labels and verbatim wording may contain errors. See [methodology](https://meetings.lexingtonky.news/about/methodology) or [report a correction](mailto:editor@lexingtonky.news). --- ## Meeting Overview The Water Quality Fees Board met on July 23, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in the North Elkhorn Conference Room at the Tate Building, 125 Industrial Avenue, Suite 180. The board addressed two agenda items during the meeting. One motion was voted on and approved, regarding a Change Order Request. The board also received an informational presentation on FY 2027 Class A Neighborhood Grant Selection. No public comments were heard during the meeting. ## Attendance The following individuals were present at the Board meeting on July 23, 2026: * Eric DeWalt * Tyler * Doug * Doc Baldwin * Frank * Scott Crutcher No members were absent or late. ## Votes and Decisions The Board approved a change order to the Kentucky American Water and Volatile Trash Collection System Project in Reservoir Form. The motion passed by voice vote [timestamp: 0:25:53]. ## Budget and Financial Actions The Board approved a change order budget request totaling $60,000 for the Kentucky American Water and Volatile Trash Collection System Project. This grant funding is designated for Kentucky American Water to support modifications to the project scope. ## Change Order Request Eric DeWalt presented a change order request for the Kentucky American Water and Volatile Trash Collection System Project [timestamp: 00:00]. The presentation detailed the project's progress to date, identified challenges encountered during implementation, and outlined the need for additional funding to complete the work. The change order request was approved by the Board. ## FY 2027 Class A Neighborhood Grant Selection [timestamp: 26:59] The board discussed the selection of Class A Neighborhood Grants for fiscal year 2027. Frank presented information regarding applications and funding recommendations for the grant program. The discussion focused on reviewing the submitted applications and determining which organizations or projects would receive funding through the Class A Neighborhood Grant program. The board examined the applications as part of their deliberative process for making funding recommendations. This agenda item was presented as informational in nature, with the primary outcome being discussion and review of the grant selection process rather than a formal vote or binding decision at this meeting. --- ## Decisions - **Motion** — passed (0-0): Approval of change order to the Kentucky American Water and Volatile Trash Collection System Project in Reservoir Form --- ## Full transcript reservoir, but you also have another entity involved with the Arizona Fishing Club, which maintains that reservoir sort of on behalf or for the public interest as well, but anyways, so that's how that plays it. That's what its role is to the Kentucky River. And with that, I will hand it over to Eric DeWalt here to go through the presentation. All right. Yes, first of all, good morning, and just want to make sure, can you all hear me okay? Doug's shaking his head, so I guess we're good. All right. So, yeah, thank you, Tyler. Tyler's the project manager for this project. My name's Eric DeWalt. We've done a couple of projects for the Stormwater Quality Projects Incentive Grant Program over the past decade or so, and appreciate the opportunity to work on a lot of those. This is one of the ones I'm most excited about out of all of them, because it's making an impact that's really, really big. So the goal, as Tyler said, is to keep trash out of the reservoir. What we're going to talk about today is the reservoir and the trash problem. As Tyler alluded to what the reservoir does, I'll talk about the problem a little bit more. What we've built and how it's working, the remaining challenges that are caused by the site constraints, the proposed solution to those challenges, and then the change order budget request. So as Tyler said, if you're inside New Circle Road, you're probably getting your water from the Richmond Road Treatment Plant located there on Richmond Road, where that blue star is. The water for that plant comes from Jacobson Reservoir, or Reservoir Number 4, same thing, which is pumped to the plant. A lot of times the water is pumped from the Kentucky River to the reservoir, where it can settle out, settleable solids and whatnot, and then further pumped to the plant. So big drinking water issues with whatever's in that reservoir that have, if any pollutants that are in there have to be treated. So this is zooming in a little bit more to Reservoir 4. You can see it down here at the bottom, and we've got two watersheds that were evaluated as part of the grant. I'll start with the blue one, 270 some acres over off of Squires Road, where the little blue star is, mostly residential, not a lot of trash we ended up finding coming from that relative to the red watershed, which is 800 acres of over 50% impervious area. And it's kind of that Richmond Road, Man O' War to almost New Circle Corridor. The uppermost building there on Richmond Road is Lowe's, to put that in perspective, and as you can see, it's mostly impervious area along Richmond Road. And so we get a lot of garbage that comes off those parking lots and roads that drains down the storm sewers through the creek into the lake. And at that red star there, that's where we're going to be spending most of our time today at what we call the northern inlet under Squires Road. These are just pictures of trash that have washed up on the bank. These are probably from 2019, 2020 timeframe. So this is looking upstream of that inlet at Squires Road. You can see the trash all in this little ponded area. There's a little track up in the creek for some reason that day. But trash just piles up in this little ponded area upstream of Squires Road. This is the culvert entrance inlet of Squires Road. You can kind of see it's exposed. It's not underwater on the picture there. And this is what it looks like when it rains. So you've seen the rivers of trash that flow in countries like India and Central America. This isn't quite that bad, but we do have our own little river of trash that washes in from that watershed. So this trash is just piling up over the top of that culvert right in this picture because the water's up over the top of the pipe. So it just flows in. And then on the downstream side, this is what it looks like when it comes out. So we're now downstream of Squires Road. Now hopefully the video's good enough that you guys can see all the trash that's washed into the reservoir. This was, again, before the project, the trash project was installed. See the bottles floating around kind of in an eddy? There's that sign. And just keep that in mind for reference. And then the banks just get littered with this trash. So again, this is our drinking water supply where all this trash is washing in. So in 2019, I guess, we were asked by Kentucky American to help put together a grant for dealing with the trash. It was awarded by the Water Quality Fees Board for a FY 2020 grant. The full amount at that time, I think, was $300,000 from the grant and $75,000 cost match. We got started in 2021 with the design-build team of Ridgewater and Stantec. COVID kind of slowed it down. But one of the big issues during the contracting phase was between Kentucky American and LFUCG. Who was going to maintain this trash trap? And so I don't know if you're aware, but LFUCG has installed several floatable trash traps around the city, but they're usually in storm sewers. The Division of Environmental Services installed two trash traps on streams, one at Cross Keys Park and one at Picodome Sinkhole. They worked great at catching trash, but they also caught walnuts and leaves and everything else. The maintenance was just the problem. In fact, the maintenance was so hard that LFUCG paid Eco-Gro to go tear out the trash traps because the city just couldn't maintain them. So the maintenance became a big part of this contract negotiation. So we needed to come up with a solution where people were not manually handling trash, picking up bags of trash or big nets of trash, or even having to pick it out of the stream. So that turned us into what our goals were. So the first must-have goal, and these were the goals that had to be met, was to catch the floatable trash. It needed to be stable for a long time, 20-year design life. So it needed to be made of plastic or aluminum or stainless steel. And it needed to be stable in the 100-year storm. As you can tell, that's a pretty big culvert. Eight hundred acres of drainage area produces a lot of water flow during big storms. As we found out probably last month in June, it got tested a lot. It needs to be safe to empty, so no manual picking of the trash. We didn't want anybody having to go in and reach with their hands or with pickers to pick the trash up. It also needed to be safe because it's near water. We wanted to collect data for research to determine what type of trash and how much was coming in. And obviously, we wanted to meet the grant budget. Like to have goals, and these were, if we can make it happen, it'd be pretty cool. We wanted to develop a low-cost trap design that could be used anywhere in America or around the world. A lot of the traps that are on the market are tens of thousands of dollars just for the trap, which is prohibitively expensive for a lot of municipalities to install. We wanted to educate as much as possible because the more people that know about trash going into our creeks and our streams and our lakes, the better. So we started off with this concept. This was the concept from our grant application. Just to put you in context here, there's Squires Road. This is the northern inlet. A little ponded area to the north is not owned by Kentucky American Water. It's actually owned by several landowners that own little townhouses. So in that top right, you can see the little property lines. And that's one reason we were not able to put a trash trap upstream of Squires Road. The other reason was if the trash trap broke loose, it could clog the culvert. So it was decided to put the trash trap downstream of Squires Road, and our first concept was we were going to do a pretty typical engineering thing, which was to put a bunch of rock and concrete in and try to catch it in a big screened area. Once we got into it, though, we found out that the water levels rose and went up and down five or six feet because, as Tyler said, the water not only is pumped out of this reservoir, it's pumped into the reservoir. So the water actually flows upstream through the culvert a lot of times. So any trash that would be caught in this system, we don't know when we would get it out, so it may just wash right back upstream. In addition, it was going to be just kind of a not very good system to access. So we decided not to do that. Then we thought, okay, we'll put a trash trap and some booms, and we'll catch it, and then we'll haul it up a boat ramp, and we might put an entrance off Squires Road where a garbage truck could come in and get it. Again, water levels go up and down, that's fine. But what we found was the wind blows to the north a lot, and any trash that's on these banks actually blows up into the fence and into the trees and makes a big old mess. So we trashed, no pun intended, that idea and decided to keep the trash trap right at the headwall. So what does that mean? Three things with the floating trash trap. We would put the booms on riser rods that would allow the booms to float up and down as the water level went up and down. We would use an HDPE container, something that floats, to catch the trash, and then LFUCG Waste Management agreed to dump it as long as it was in a standard receptacle that they could pick up with their garbage trucks. So kind of like Iron Man, we started with some big ugly stuff and worked our way and refined it over time. So this is what we call the heavy metal prototype. This is our metal fabricator. He's converting this bulk box into something that could be lifted with a dump truck by welding steel on it. It's a prototype, so we weren't worried about making it out of aluminum or stainless, which was expensive. So we rigged that up, floated it out to the location of the headwall, and tied it to the headwall with booms, and it worked great. It caught trash wonderfully. So we knew that we could make it work by putting the booms in and having to trash it. The problem was it was just too heavy, and it was a maintenance nightmare to try to get that thing in and out of the water. So the next one was what we call the blue plastic prototype. It was a small 4x4 box. Again, caught trash, as you can see in the picture. We've got the riser rods that we installed on the headwall there, a half-inch pipe. The trap would float up and down with the water level, and it did a great job catching trash. The problem was it was too small. It couldn't hold all the trash that would wash into it. So one day while driving around UK, I noticed they had some plastic dumpsters, which I had never seen before. So we went and bought one and converted it into what looks like this moon rover at the bottom, a floating trash trap dumpster. We installed it, and it worked great. It catches the trash. It's big enough. It floats. It's not too heavy. It's easy to move around. As you can see in this picture, we caught trash. And you can see we've installed more permanent risers on the headwall here that are one-inch steel pipes. So just like Goldilocks, we found the one that was just right. Now, how we got it out of there, in hindsight, was kind of stupid. We thought we would just pull it up the bank with a winch, which we did. As you can see on the right, we caught a lot of trash. We categorized it into buckets of styrofoam and plastic and metal and organics and whatnot. So we were meeting the grant requirements. But it was kind of hard to get the trash trap out of the lake. So we ended up having a conversation with the Lake Ellerslie Fishing Club. And they said, gosh, we love what you're doing. You've kept the trash out of the lake. You don't have to pick it up off the banks. And we said, well, can you haul the trash trap to your boat ramp? They said, absolutely. So this is Jimmy. Jimmy's driving the boat back there without a life jacket on. And so he agreed to haul the trash trap from the headwall to their boat ramp, which is the bottom picture, where it could easily be accessed by a LFUCG waste management garbage truck. So we got some information from Jimmy as he hauled this thing back and forth. It can only be three feet deep because there's a sewer line that runs across Lake Ellerslie that this thing would drag on. So he said, you know, that was his contribution to the design. Otherwise, he's glad to help. So we haul the dumpster to the boat ramp. LFUCG's Scott Crutcher agrees to come over and pick it up. And voila, trash disappears. And it works great. So over the past several years, we have collected 1,500 plus gallons of trash. That's enough to fill a dump truck. And so it's working pretty well. Now that brings us to a couple of problems that we've identified that we're working on. One, trying to work from a boat on a trash trap in the middle of the lake is kind of dangerous. As you can see, these guys are reaching around, trying to hook and unhook things. It's not super deep water, but not the safest thing. So we came up with the concept to install a pontoon dock system, which is in purple here. If you notice, we've got it attached to the headwall. We've got the blue trash trap behind it. And that is actually under construction right now. So we're building the pontoon boat as we speak. We also would like to put in a walkway so that people from the bank can just walk out to it and access it. And that way nobody has to get in the boat just to, you know, unhook, hook, push the trash into the trash trap, that sort of thing. All right, this brings us to our... And we've dealt with that problem. This brings us to our second problem. And this problem has to do with the operation of the lake. So as I said, sometimes the water's pumped in, sometimes the water's pumped out. But when we get a big storm event, or when Kentucky American pumps a lot of water in, the water can actually get up over the headwall. And since we're attached to the headwall, anything, any trash that's caught can actually sneak out around the bank. And it's very frustrating to catch trash and then it sneaks out on you when the water level goes up. So this bank gets kind of trashed. This is what it looks like up close. You can see the headwall is underwater about six inches. And the trash trap is floating there, catching some of the trash, but some of it escapes. So to finish the job, we've got two steps. Raise the headwall. And because we're raising the headwall, we need to structurally connect the trash trap to something other than the headwall. So raising the headwall is going to be pretty straightforward. We're going to raise it up two feet with either concrete or a plate. We're leaning toward the plate right now. But we can't connect to it because we've got a pretty high hydrodynamic load of water coming out of the culvert about 15 feet per second during the 100-year storm when the lake level is low. It produces 12 kips, or 12,000 pounds, which would be about six cars. So we don't want the headwall to turn over. So we've come up with the concept of putting ground anchors in. So one concept of ground anchors is to put a big block of concrete called a concrete deadman in. This is an example on the right of a reservoir in Colorado. As you can see, it's just a big block of concrete. You attach whatever you want to, and the gravity holds it in place. Problem with that, we can't use it because we don't have room for something that big in between the fence and the lake. So the recommended solution is a soil nail that can be drilled down into soil rock or rock fill. It has a drill bit on the end, and as they're installing it, they pump it full of grout, and then it seals up and provides tensile resistance for forces. All right, so that brings us to our overall design, which we've got a 3D rendering here. I wanted to go over with you. You can see we've got the ground anchors in the bank on both sides of the headwall. The headwall's underwater right now. You can see the plate of the headwall extension in light green. You got the floating booms. You got the pontoon boat with the gangway, and then you got your trash trap on the back. All right, I'm going to play a movie here. Hopefully it works. I'm going to go through it in animation. So first we're going to look at the ground anchors. They're attached by a cable to the pontoon boat. Got your pontoon boat where you can access the trap, and you can actually rake the trash through the middle into the trap. You can see the little cans floating. We've got a one-way door there, kind of like a pool skimmer. It floats up and down with the water levels. The gangway will also be able to adjust with the water levels. Looking underneath here, you can see that the booms are not attached to the pontoon boat, so they're free-floating so that there's no structural load applied to the headwall. Again, everything floats up and down with the water level. And we'll take a little view coming from the perspective of the trash entering the trap here shortly. So that's the trap. I wanted to pause this. There's the headwall extension in light green, and there's where the trash comes in. The ground anchors, though, they're not cheap, and it's only specialty contractors installed them. So from geospecialties, we've asked for quotes from a couple more, but conservatively, it's about $112,000 to install ground anchors. The other items that we've got left to finish, such as the pontoon boat and the walkway, you can see what those numbers are. And our remaining construction budget is about $143,000. So $218,000 minus $143,000 leaves us with $75,000, with some contingency left in there. So the request is for $60,000 from LFUCG, and $15,000 would be provided by Kentucky American as a cost share. So what does that give us? It gives us a raised headwall that contains the trash at any level. It provides ground anchors that protect Squires Road to Culvert, and it provides safe access for the personnel that are going to keep the lake clean. So with that, thank you to Kentucky American Water and LFUCG and the Water Quality Fees Boards. And special thanks to Frank and Doug for their patience as we figure out what we're doing on this project. So with that, I was going to see if you had any questions. Hey, Eric. Yes, sir. This is Doc Baldwin. Do you have any pictures of the construction that has already been taking place on the pontoon? Yes. I thought the board might like to see a little bit of the work that's already been done with the new pontoon. Yes, sir. So our metal fabricator is the name of the metal fabricator is Angry Anvil. So if you see Angry Anvil, it's not because he's angry. That's just the name of his company. Let's see. Can everybody see that? Yes. All right. So this is the pontoon in the metal fabricator shop. It's got a aluminum decking for safety. It's got an aluminum handrail that goes around it. It's not finished, obviously. So you can kind of see the underframing, a couple of views, and then that's the view from the trash trap looking upstream. So basically, for the board's knowledge, is this was an old pontoon that you all purchased and then you basically have disassembled and are now reusing the pontoons, and I believe you even cut the pontoons to shorten them? Yes. It's a 20-foot pontoon boat, and we cut it down to 12 feet. So it's innovative in the sense you're using something old and halfway almost ready to be abandoned, and now we're repurposing it for this task. It's definitely innovative because we started off, obviously, we didn't know what we were doing because we kept doing down different roads until we got to this point. Any other questions? Eric, I appreciate the presentation, and Doug, good idea, thanks for bringing up the pictures. That was a lot of fun. All right. So we need a motion, sir. Well, I'd like to just present a recommendation. Oh, sure. Just a minute. It's a good idea, but as you can see in the background, a lot of the recommendations, so the recommendation that the board consider approval of Chamberlain Plus their six-gallon based on the quality of the work. Similar to the two students, it's $60,000, which is within the program. It's not $50,000. It's $60,000, and that's going to provide an additional match to the contracted percentage. As a project site located in an area, I've got a fraction of the work that comes from So, I'm going to drink water sources that were produced in the work similar to that in the University of Kentucky, storm, pulling water from the stream over it. I'm going to drink water. So, as you can see, Doug, it presents those amounts. Fortunately, it's a local, it's a boarded, as well as what you were asking for here, both from the Plus and additional voucher from Chamberlain. Remember the $615,000? Yes. I would be concerned about that. Frank, any questions or discussion? You're still saying $615,000? Yes. At least it's the maximum. Yeah, I mean, I think my personal experience, this is really exciting. I mean, I think the site visit was really helpful, too, to see it in front of us. So, I'm going to turn it over to you. I think it was a great project. I mean, seeing the trash, being able to see the magnitude of the fact that we were able to bring so many students in together, I think it's an awesome idea. Because of that, it's going to help the city, and I think it's a great idea. Yeah, it looks like a great project. Eric, thank you for your presentation. It was very interesting to go through the whole history of it. I think it seems like a great project. Thank you. Thank you. I make a motion to approve the change order to the Connecticut American Water and Volatile Trash Collection System Project in Reservoir Form. Second the motion. Second. Any discussion? Seeing none, I'll put you to a vote. All in favor? Aye. Opposed? Passed. Thank you, Eric. All right. Thank you. Y'all have a good day. Eric, I want to thank you for doing this on your vacation and a well-put-together presentation. Thank you. I thought there might be a bunch of kids come in trying to play pool behind me, so that worked out well. Thanks, man. Thank you. Have a good one, guys. Appreciate it. Thank you all very much. I appreciate y'all's time. Thank you. The next item on our agenda are the Class A neighborhood grant selection. So, thanks, Frank, for talking to me. Yes. So, I'll start out just by just reading kind of like the summary document. And then we'll just kind of go through our grant termination form real quickly. But I just wanted to mention the grant selection document. And then we'll talk about the length of the grant. So, there's a $40,000. This is the push-off of the Class A program that I came up with. Thank you. For Class A FY27, in terms of funding, there's $120,000 maximum grant request. We still have the target of $45,000 feasibility-only grants. That was one type of basis submitted for this category. We also have the Innovation, Experimental, and Research funded pool with a balance kind of $156,800 available in FY27 budgets, $20,526. Since the unused grant funds, $0 this year, then we also have both remaining FY26 grant funds, $30,000 to $30,082. So, we'll have FY27 funding for Class A grants, $600,000 to $17,082. We received $261,860 in application and grant funds. So, with that, we will just, first, I need to mention applications. So, I'll give a quick go here. Application number one is from Frank's Group 1. We requested a grant amount of $15,405. The cost should amount to $25,410. I've been told the project budget is $15,000. The grant project dollars, as usual, is to recruit, train, supply, and support students that are currently on this grant. To maintain the budget, it's stated from Frank's Group 1. It should contain those entities. Other project-governed locations are listed in the document. I'm not going to go in and check them out, but just as a general note, some of the sites are similar, and they've added one or two, for a total of at least six sites. And, of course, they have pretty good educational assignments and classroom program activities, as well as the project coordination for the treasury and account systems. Next slide, please. Next slide, please. The Longland Growns, the Longland Growns Association, and they requested a grant of $20,000. The cost should amount to $30,000. $30,000. Their goal is to design and construct a large, surrounding capstream. Their project elements include fund-raising, stabilization, and establishing small-large units, enhancing recreational environments, and water and education. Thank you. Each of these recommendations are listed, so just as a general note. The next application relates from Fremson, parts of the county, requests a grant amount of $41,500. The cost should amount to $20,000 total costs for the project, which should amount to $10. Design and installation, BMPs to address eroding ditches, restoring and enhancing permanent buffer areas, providing extension elements that increase the public's access to natural features in an urban setting. Project grant elements actually include the existing general stabilization of existing extension bases, stabilizing existing surface drainage, channel above extension basin, and increased operative buffer zone and extension basin channels, following the proposed extension plan, which includes a site and plant belt. Thank you. The next application is from the Glen Association. They requested $5,057. The cost should amount to $12,630 for the project, which should amount to $6,029. Their primary goal is to expand the treaty community, which will help reduce stormwater runoff, improve water quality, and replace lost and aging treaties. Their goal was to grant and expand the treaty's permanent current budget area. Thank you. The next application is from the Palo Verde Project. They requested $26,310 for the project, which should amount to $12,940. The cost should amount to $7,330. They plan to host the 2027 U.S. Water Summit. They also plan to provide education outreach, as well as conduct extreme investigation to determine the cause of the disaster. Thank you. The next application is from the Park Township Association. They requested $12,000 for the project, which should amount to $15,366. Their project is a feasibility-based study to propose stormwater solutions to meet existing stormwater infrastructure. The study will focus on areas where runoff for earthing carries debris and potential contaminants in the stormwater system. The organization hopes the project will lay the groundwork for a long-term improvements that will contribute to the program. The project will also incorporate some engagement events and bridge investments towards making the project more action-driven. The final application is from the Cleveland Acceleration Association. They requested $1,000 for the project, which should amount to $1,250. They also plan to install a 250-square-feet of three-cabin housing to stabilize the soil, increase erosion, and serve as runoff. Again, the regulations are listed on each one of those. We'll be announcing the cost at the end of the meeting. We'll be announcing the cost at the end of the meeting. We'll be announcing the cost at the end of the meeting. We'll be announcing the cost at the end of the meeting. We'll start with Friends of Wolf Run. We'll start with Friends of Wolf Run. We'll start with Friends of Wolf Run. The staff recommends full approval The staff recommends full approval of the amount of $1,500, requiring the project of 13 feet, additional risk of 87, to be a motion on front of the committee. of the amount of $1,500, requiring the project All right, we have a motion. All right, we have a motion. Second. Is there any discussion on this application? Is there any discussion on this application? Is there any discussion on this application? Seeing none, we will look at the chair and entertain a vote. All those in favor? Any opposed? Next application is Walnut Grove. The staff recommends full funding of $120,000, requiring the of $120,000, requiring the of $120,000, requiring the of $120,000, requiring the motion to approve. Is there any discussion on this application? Is there any discussion on this application? I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. Has anyone else got a note? But, But, but addressed any concerns about it? Any concerns about it? Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. Any other discussion or questions? Any other discussion or questions? Yeah, we do. Yeah. Any discussion or questions? I'm I'm I'm I'm a I'm I'm I'm I'm a I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm ... I'm I'm ... I'm I'm I'm I'm ... I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm ... I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm I'm a a I'm I'm a a a a a a