Council Committee of the Whole
Watch the official video · Markdown version · Full transcript (text) · Agenda (PDF)
Summary
Meeting Overview
The Committee of the Whole met on March 9, 2010, presided over by the Vice Mayor. The meeting covered three agenda items, all of which were informational in nature: Council Rules Revisions, Council Committee Changes, and Other Business. No final decisions or binding actions were taken on these items, as the session was structured to inform and discuss rather than to vote on substantive policy matters. Over the course of the meeting, 4 motions and votes were recorded, and no public comments were heard.
Attendance
Present (12 members): - Council Member Crosby - Council Member Myers - Council Member Lane - Council Member Beard - Council Member Lawless - Council Member Gordon - Council Member Martin - Council Member Stennett - Council Member James - Council Member Feigl - Council Member Wallace - Council Member Blues
Absent (1): - KC
Late: None
Votes and Decisions
The Council considered four motions during the meeting, all of which passed.
- Amendment on Unclassified Positions 1:02:43: Council Member Myers moved, and Council Member Stennett seconded, an amendment to exclude unclassified positions from a provision that would not require Council approval. The motion passed on a voice vote.
- Amendment on Professional Service Contracts 1:28:17: Council Member Martin moved to add the phrase "in the aggregate per project" to language governing professional service contracts. The motion passed on a voice vote. No second was recorded.
- Removal of Items from Resolution and Referral to Intergovernmental Committee 2:08:10: Council Member Crosby moved, and Council Member McCord seconded, to remove items B, C, D, and F from the resolution under consideration and to move the procurement and professional services matters into the Intergovernmental Committee. The motion passed on a roll call vote of 9 to 3.
- Voting yes: Council Members Crosby, Myers, Lane, Beard, Lawless, Gordon, Martin, Stennett, and James
- Voting no: Council Members Feigl, Wallace, and Blues
- Software Purchase and Implementation 2:10:54: Council Member Myers moved to proceed with the purchase and implementation of software by September 2010. The motion passed on a roll call vote. No individual vote tallies or a second were recorded for this motion.
Budget and Financial Actions
The Council discussed two financial figures related to proposed changes to the legislative process during the March 9, 2010 meeting.
- Projected Savings from Reducing Resolutions: The Council considered an estimated $335,000 in savings associated with reducing the number of resolutions processed. No specific resolution number or vendor was identified in connection with this figure.
- Software Purchase for Legislative Process: A software solution to support changes to the legislative process was discussed at an estimated cost of $80,000. No vendor or specific procurement identifier was provided in the meeting materials.
No additional budget items, appropriations, contracts, or financial transfers were recorded for this meeting.
Contested Items
Professional Service Contracts and Procurement Process
The Council engaged in heated discussion regarding the transparency and approval process surrounding professional service contracts and procurement. The debate centered on concerns about how these contracts were being handled and whether the existing process provided sufficient oversight and clarity.
The discussion was significant enough that the Council ultimately decided the matter required further review rather than resolution at that meeting. As an outcome, the Council moved the discussion of professional service contracts and procurement to the Intergovernmental Committee for continued examination.
No additional details regarding the specific individuals involved in the debate or the precise points of contention are available from the meeting record.
Council Rules Revisions
The Council held a discussion on proposed revisions to its operating rules, with the stated goals of improving efficiency and transparency in council operations. A key element of the proposed changes involved reducing the number of resolutions requiring full council approval.
Key speakers in the discussion included Council Member Lane, Council Member Myers, and Council Member Gordon. The item was informational in nature, meaning no formal vote or binding decision was taken at this meeting.
No additional detail on the specific concerns raised, the scope of proposed rule changes, or the positions of individual council members is available from the provided record.
Council Committee Changes
The Council took up Agenda Item II, a discussion regarding changes to council committees aimed at streamlining processes and improving legislative efficiency.
Council Member Lane and Council Member Myers were the key speakers on this item. The discussion centered on proposed adjustments to the structure or composition of council committees, with the stated goal of making the council's legislative workflow more effective.
This item was informational in nature, meaning no formal vote or binding action was taken as a result of the discussion. The matter was presented to keep the full council apprised of the changes under consideration rather than to seek immediate approval.
No additional details regarding the specific committees affected, the nature of the structural changes proposed, or any concerns raised during the discussion are reflected in the available record for this agenda item.
Other Business
The Council moved into Agenda Item III, Other Business, which included general discussion on various topics. The primary subject of conversation was the implementation of software intended to manage legislative processes.
Council Member Myers and Council Member Lawless were the key participants in this discussion. The item was informational in nature, and no formal action or vote was taken as a result of the conversation.
No additional details regarding the specific software under consideration, the concerns raised, or the positions taken by individual Council Members are available from the meeting record.
Decisions
- Motion — passed (0-0): Amendment to exclude unclassified positions from not requiring council approval
- Motion — passed (0-0): Amendment to add 'in the aggregate per project' to professional service contracts
- Motion — passed (9-3): Remove items B, C, D, and F from the resolution and move procurement and professional services into Intergovernmental Committee
- Motion — passed (0-0): Move forward with the purchase and implementation of software by September 2010