Council Work Session
Watch the official video · Markdown version · Full transcript (text) · Agenda (PDF)
Summary
Meeting Overview
The Lexington-Fayette Urban County Council met on May 13, 2025, at 3:00 PM in the Council Chamber in Lexington, KY, with Mayor Gorton presiding. The meeting's agenda included two items: a public comment period for issues on the agenda and a continuing business and presentations segment, both of which were informational in nature. During the meeting, the Council heard 2 public comments and conducted 2 votes. The session also included presentations as part of the continuing business portion of the agenda.
Attendance
The following members were present at the May 13, 2025 Council meeting:
- Wu, Brown, Ellinger II, Morton, Lynch, LeGris, Curtis, Sheehan, Gray, Hale, Beasley, Baxter, Sevigny, Reynolds, and Boone
Absent: Joseph Hale
Late: George Brown
Votes and Decisions
Two motions came before the Council during the May 13, 2025 meeting, both passing by voice vote.
- Approval of May 6, 2025 Work Session Motions 35:17: A motion to approve the motions from the May 6, 2025 Work Session was made by Curtis and seconded by Gray. The motion passed by voice vote. No individual roll call votes were recorded.
- Placement of ZOTA 25-00001 on the May 29, 2025 Docket 3:35:12: A motion to place ZOTA 25-00001, as amended, on the May 29, 2025 docket was made by Baxter. No second was recorded in the data. The motion passed by voice vote. No individual roll call votes were recorded.
Budget and Financial Actions
The Council considered two financial actions at the May 13, 2025 meeting, covering a construction contract amendment and a vehicle purchase.
- Change Order #3 – New Senior & Therapeutic Center (Resolution 0439-25): The Council took up authorization to execute Change Order #3 with Calhoun Construction for the New Senior & Therapeutic Center project. The change order totals $1,132,447.13, modifying the existing construction contract for the facility.
- SVI 18' Air Truck Purchase (Resolution 0478-25): The Council considered authorization to enter into a purchase agreement with SVI Trucks for one SVI 18' Air Truck at a cost of $779,168.00.
Combined, the two actions represent approximately $1.9 million in authorized expenditures. No additional financial details, funding sources, or vote outcomes were included in the available data for these items.
Public Comment
Two members of the public addressed the Council during the comment period.
- Alan Overmyer spoke in support of the Memorandum of Understanding regarding the use of Hazel Park. He expressed appreciation for Lexington's support of UK Army ROTC and indicated he was available to answer any questions the Council might have. 2:07
- Mike Brower addressed the Council regarding House Bill 443, voicing opposition to any interpretation of the bill that would reduce public input in government proceedings. Brower referenced a letter from Representative Chad Aul in support of his position. 3:13
Contested Items
Two items generated notable disagreement during the May 13, 2025 Council meeting.
House Bill 443 and Public Input
Community members voiced opposition to interpretations of House Bill 443 that would restrict public participation in planning processes. Multiple speakers raised concerns during the meeting, reflecting broader community unease about how the bill's provisions might be applied to limit input from residents on development and land-use decisions. The structured data does not indicate a final vote or resolution on this matter, but the volume of community opposition made it one of the more prominent points of contention during the session.
Notification Requirements for Development Plans
A separate dispute arose over how extensive notification must be when development plans are submitted or advanced. The debate centered on competing interests: developers raised concerns about the administrative and financial burden that broader notification requirements could impose, while others emphasized the importance of keeping affected community members informed and involved. This item resulted in a split vote among Council members, indicating that no clear consensus was reached and that the question of balancing developer practicality against community transparency remained unresolved at the close of discussion.
- Both items touched on the overarching theme of community access to planning and development decisions.
- No additional named individuals or specific vote tallies were recorded in the available data for either item.
Public Comment - Issues on Agenda
During the public comment period for issues on the agenda, community members addressed the Council with concerns centered on House Bill 443 and its potential effects on public participation in planning processes.
Two speakers were identified during this portion of the meeting:
- Alan Overmyer
- Mike Brower
Both speakers raised concerns about House Bill 443, focusing specifically on how the legislation could impact the ability of the public to provide input in planning-related proceedings. The comments were informational in nature, and no formal action was taken by the Council in response to the public testimony.
Continuing Business/Presentations
This portion of the meeting focused on efficiencies in development processes and the municipality's compliance with House Bill 443, including related amendments to zoning ordinances.
Council Member Brown and Commissioner Horn were the key speakers during this discussion. The presentation covered efforts to streamline development-related procedures and addressed the requirements imposed by House Bill 443, with particular attention to how zoning ordinance amendments would need to be structured to bring the municipality into compliance.
The item was informational in nature, and no formal vote or binding action was taken as a result of the discussion.
Decisions
- Motion — passed (0-0): approve the May 6, 2025 Work Session Summary
- Motion — passed (0-0): approve New Business
- Motion — passed (0-0): approve Council Capital Projects
- Motion — passed (0-0): require the applicant in the development plan process to post signage at the development site announcing plans and include the Division of Planning contact information; mandate that the Planning Commission agenda include a list of recent certified development plans, and provide opportunity for public comment about certified development plans at the Planning Commission meeting immediately following the aforementioned agenda item
- Motion — passed (12-9): amend the ZOTA to delete Sec. 12-9(b)
- Motion — passed (12-9): amend the ZOTA, Sec. 12-9(c) to read: loading docks, trash collection areas, and outdoor storage of items not intended for sale shall not be located within the front yard. Accessory outdoor sales areas for merchandise shall be permitted within the front yard
- Motion — passed (12-9): amend the ZOTA, Sec. 12-9(d) to read: sidewalks a minimum of five (5) feet in width are required along the full length of any exterior wall featuring a customer entrance or an abutting off-street parking lot, and along sides of the lot that abut a public or private street
- Motion — passed (12-9): amend the ZOTA, Sec. 12-9(f) to read: sidewalks a minimum of five (5) feet in width shall be provided to connect the customer entrance locations to the public or private right-of-way. A maximum of two (2) crosswalks are allowed to make the connection
- Motion — failed (16-6): refer to the General Government and Planning Committee, Sec. 16-6 (a)(3)(c) of the ZOTA
- Motion — passed (12-8): amend the ZOTA, Sec. 12-8(h)(1) to read: for all commercial centers abutting a transit route, a minimum of one (1) transit shelter with seating shall be provided on such route, and shall have sidewalk connections a minimum of five (5) feet in width to both the internal and perimeter pedestrian circulation systems. Such transit shelter shall not be required when an existing transit shelter is present within 1/4 mile of the development along the same side of the roadway, and connected to the development with a continuous pedestrian network
- Motion — passed (21-9): amend the ZOTA, Sec. 21-9(a)(1)(c)(i) to read: The applicant has incorporated other design measures that exceed the minimums of the zone and mitigate for non-compliance with the requirements to be waived (net beneficial effect)
- Motion — passed (21-9): amend the ZOTA, Sec. 21-9(e) to read: The Commission may impose additional conditions or restrictions intended to mitigate the specific impact of the modification or waiver. These conditions or restrictions shall be noted on the plan and are only able to be modified by the Planning Commission
- Motion — failed (18-3): amend the ZOTA, Sec. 18-3(b)(4)(c) to read: Every other row of double- loaded parking requires a continuous interior landscape area of a minimum of eight (8) feet in width when trees are provided
- Motion — passed (16-12): amend the ZOTA, Sec. 16-12(d) to read: 50% or greater of the required bicycle parking for multi-family developments shall be covered and either located directly adjacent to the structure, or in a location internal to the structure. Bicycle parking shall be allocated proportionately between the residential structures on a development based on the number of residential units in each structure
- Motion — passed (0-0): replace Sec. 16-15 of the ZOTA with the language presented to Council and displayed on screen
- Motion — passed (0-0): refer Sec. 16-9 of the ZOTA to the General Government & Planning Committee
- Motion — passed (21-4): amend the ZOTA, Sec. 21-4(c) to add: the applicant shall provide mailed notification of the development plan to all property owners within a 250-foot radius of the subject property. Addresses shall be obtained using current available data from the Property Valuation Administrator. Such notice shall be given no less than ten (10) calendar days prior to the Technical Review Committee at which the request is to be considered, as amended
- Motion — passed (11-3): amend the previous motion to add: the applicant shall provide mailed notification of the development plan to all property owners and occupants within a 250-foot radius of the subject property
- Motion — passed (21-4): amend the ZOTA, Sec. 21-4(c) to add: the mailed notification shall state when the development plan has been filed, the address of the property to be developed, information about how to find the file of the development plan, and contact information for the Division of Planning
- Motion — passed (21-9): amend the ZOTA, Sec. 21-9(b) to read: Following receipt of a completed application, the applicant shall provide notice of the request for modification to property owners within a 250-foot radius of the proposal now under consideration for waiver. Addresses shall be obtained using current available data from the from the Property Valuation Administrator. Such notice shall be given no less than ten (10) calendar days prior to the meeting at which the request is to be considered
- Motion — passed (0-0): amend the motion on the floor to place the proposed amendment into the General Government and Planning Committee
- Motion — passed (0-0): place the ZOTA, as amended, on the May 29, 2025, Council Meeting Docket
- Motion — passed (0-0): place on the docket for the May 29, 2025, Council Meeting, a resolution amending Resolution 684-2004 to revise various parking restrictions on Cherokee Park