Technical Review Committee

Summary

Meeting Overview

The Technical Committee convened on November 26, 2025, at 8:30 a.m. in the Phoenix Building, 3rd Floor Conference Room. The meeting's presiding officer is not recorded in the available materials. The committee worked through a full agenda of 10 items, spanning final subdivision plans, development plans, zoning development plans, reapprovals, and previously postponed items.

Of the 10 agenda items considered, 8 were approved and 2 were postponed — specifically the Development Plans for Wolf Run Industrial Park, Lot 1, and the Zoning Development Plans for Lexmark International Corporation, Lot 1. A total of 10 motions and votes were taken during the meeting. No public comments were heard.

Attendance

The following members were present at the Committee meeting on 2025-11-26:

• Tom Hatfield
• Steve Garland
• Johan Graham
• Brad Boaz
• Stephanie Blaine
• Tony Barrett
• John Hill

No members were recorded as absent or late. All seven members were in attendance for the meeting.

Votes and Decisions

The Committee took action on ten items at the November 26, 2025 meeting, with eight approvals and two postponements, all decided unanimously.

• PLN FRP 2532 – Quintana Estates was approved unanimously with conditions: the addition of note number 8 to add access easements to lots 2 and 38, removal of note number 4 under plans, questions, or concerns, and removal of note number 6 regarding Department of Environmental Quality approval of environmentally sensitive areas. 17:57

• PLN-MJDP-25-64 – Wolf Run Industrial Park was unanimously postponed. 30:16

• PL&MJDP-25-67 – Margaret C. Kamick Property was approved unanimously without conditions. 1:01:31

• PL&MJDP-25-70 – Park Hills Shopping Center, Lot 3 was approved unanimously with conditions: removal of note number 1 under plan questions and concerns, and removal of sign-offs for the addressing office and the Division of Waste Management. 1:15:25

• PL&MJDP-25-59 – Lexmark International Corporation, Lot 1 was unanimously postponed. 1:32:51

• PL&MJDP-25-68 – Hazen Property, Montmullin Street Subdivision was approved unanimously with the condition that the Department of Environmental Quality's sign-off be removed. 1:43:42

• PL&MJDP-25-71 – Great House Property, The Village at Great Acres, Lot 9 was approved unanimously without conditions. 1:52:18

• PL&MJDP-25-44 – Interstate Park Development, Tract 1M was approved unanimously with conditions: removal of note number 2 under plans, questions, or concerns, and removal of several sign-offs. 2:05:18

• PL&MJDP-25-23 – Highmount Subdivision Unit 1, Lot 2 was approved unanimously with the condition that several sign-offs be removed. 2:08:42

• PL&MJDP-25-42 – Phelps Property was approved unanimously without conditions. 2:26:55

No roll call vote tallies were recorded for any item. No motions were attributed to specific members in the available data.

Final Subdivision Plans - Quintana Estates

0:00

The Committee opened its meeting with a discussion of the final subdivision plans for Quintana Estates. Tom Hatfield presented the proposal, which calls for 50 buildable lots and 8 HOA lots within the development.

The discussion covered various requirements and conditions associated with the final subdivision plans, though specific details of individual concerns or debate points were addressed as part of the review process. The item was categorized as a discussion matter, indicating the Committee examined the proposal's particulars before moving toward a decision.

Following the discussion, the Committee approved the final subdivision plans for Quintana Estates.

Development Plans - Wolf Run Industrial Park, Lot 1

18:27

The Committee took up Agenda Item 3a, a discussion of development plans for Wolf Run Industrial Park, Lot 1. The proposal involves the construction of several buildings intended for office and storage use on the lot.

Key speaker Josh Despain participated in the discussion, which covered the specifics of the development proposal as well as various requirements and conditions associated with the plans. The meeting record indicates that multiple conditions were raised and debated during the course of the discussion, though the specific details of those requirements were not further enumerated in the available materials.

The item was ultimately postponed, meaning no final decision or approval was reached at this meeting. The matter is expected to return before the Committee at a future date.

Development Plans - Margaret C. Kamick Property

1:01:31

The Committee took up Agenda Item 3b, a discussion of development plans for the Margaret C. Kamick Property. The proposal under consideration included a senior living facility alongside single-family residential lots.

Key speakers on this item were Steve Garland and Johan Graham, who presented and discussed the proposal with the Committee. The discussion covered various requirements and conditions associated with the development, though the specific details of those conditions were addressed during the course of the meeting.

The item was ultimately approved by the Committee.

Development Plans - Park Hills Shopping Center, Lot 3

1:15:25

The committee took up agenda item 3c, a discussion of development plans for Park Hills Shopping Center, Lot 3. Brad Boaz was the key speaker presenting on this item.

The proposal centered on a drive-through adjacent area intended to serve as a drop-off location for the Goodwill shop at the site. The discussion covered various requirements and conditions associated with the development plans, though specific details of those conditions were not itemized in the available record.

The committee ultimately approved the development plans for Park Hills Shopping Center, Lot 3.

Zoning Development Plans - Lexmark International Corporation, Lot 1

1:32:51

The Committee took up agenda item 4a, a discussion of zoning development plans for Lexmark International Corporation, Lot 1. The proposal under consideration involved the development of an automobile service station and hotel on the subject lot.

Key speakers on this item included Tom Hatfield and William Hodges, who participated in the discussion surrounding the proposal's requirements and conditions. The conversation addressed various requirements and conditions associated with the development plans, though the item was brought forward as a discussion rather than a final action item.

The item was ultimately postponed, and no final determination was reached at this meeting.

Zoning Development Plans - Hazen Property, Montmullin Street Subdivision

1:43:42

The committee took up agenda item 4b, a discussion of zoning development plans for the Hazen Property, Montmullin Street Subdivision. The proposal centers on a multi-story mixed-use building for the site.

Tom Hatfield was the key speaker during this item, presenting the development plans and addressing the various requirements and conditions associated with the proposal. The discussion covered the specifics of the mixed-use building concept as well as the conditions that would apply to the project moving forward.

The committee ultimately approved the zoning development plans for the Hazen Property, Montmullin Street Subdivision.

*Note: Additional detail on specific conditions, concerns raised, or the full scope of the debate is not available in the source data for this item.*

Zoning Development Plans - Great House Property, The Village at Great Acres, Lot 9

1:52:18

The committee took up agenda item 4c, a discussion of zoning development plans for Great House Property, The Village at Great Acres, Lot 9. The proposal under consideration involved the development of a bank with a drive-through on the subject lot.

• Key speaker: Tony Barrett presented and participated in the discussion on this item.
• The discussion covered various requirements and conditions associated with the proposed development plan for the lot.
• The proposal specifically included a bank with a drive-through as the intended use for the property.

The committee reviewed the relevant conditions tied to the development plan before moving forward. Following the discussion, the item was approved.

Reapprovals/Continued Discussion - Interstate Park Development, Tract 1M

2:05:18

The committee took up agenda item 6a, a continued discussion regarding the Interstate Park Development, Tract 1M. Stephanie Blaine was the key speaker presenting on this item.

The discussion centered on a proposal involving a hotel as well as revised lot configurations for the tract. Committee members examined various requirements and conditions associated with the development as part of this reapproval process.

The item was ultimately approved by the committee.

---

*Note: Additional detail on specific conditions, concerns raised, or debate among committee members was not available in the source materials for this agenda item.*

Postponed Items - Highmount Subdivision Unit 1, Lot 2

2:08:42

The committee took up agenda item 7b, a previously postponed matter concerning Highmount Subdivision Unit 1, Lot 2. The item involved a proposal to subdivide a lot that contains a duplex, along with discussion of the associated requirements and conditions tied to the subdivision request.

John Hill was the key speaker on this item, presenting the proposal and addressing the relevant conditions that would apply to the subdivision. The discussion covered the various requirements necessary to move the item forward, which had been the subject of the prior postponement.

Following the discussion, the committee approved the item.

Postponed Items - Phelps Property

2:26:55

The committee took up agenda item 7c, a previously postponed item concerning the Phelps Property. The proposal under consideration included a mix of uses: a convenience store (C store), a restaurant, townhomes, and apartments.

Tony Barrett was the key speaker during this portion of the meeting, leading the discussion on the item. The committee reviewed various requirements and conditions associated with the proposal as part of its deliberations on the mixed-use development.

The item was ultimately approved by the committee.

> *Note: Additional detail on specific conditions, concerns raised, or debate among committee members was not available in the source materials for this item.*