Technical Review Committee

Summary

Meeting Overview

The Planning Commission convened to consider nine agenda items spanning a range of subdivision and development plan applications. No presiding officer, meeting time, or location information is available in the record for this session. Across the meeting, the Commission took 9 votes, heard no public comments, and considered no formal presentations. Of the nine items on the agenda, six were approved and three were tabled for further consideration.

The approved items included PLN FRP 26 8 Thomason and Asbury property, as well as five major development plan applications: PLN MJDP 2613 Newtown Springs Lot 4A (Jaggers amended), PLN MJDP 2614 Ellsford Addition Block 5 Lots 1–3 (Woodland Village amended), PLN MJDP 2617 Great House Property to the Village of Great Acres Lot 9, PLN MJDP 2619 The Maxwell and Hersta Division amended, and PLN MJDP 2623 Beaumont Forest Unit 2 Lots 2 and 3. The three items tabled without resolution were PLN FRP 25 35 NDC Property Unit 3 Lot 3, PLN FRP 26 7 Coventry Belmont Farm Belmont Center Lots 1–11, and PLN MJDP 2622 Bryan Property.

Votes and Decisions

The committee took action on nine items at the March 25, 2026 meeting, all decided by voice vote. No roll call votes were recorded, and no individual vote counts or member attributions are available for any item.

Postponed Items:

• PLN FRP 25-35 (NDC property, unit 3, lot 3) was postponed. 18:12 Conditions attached to the postponement include correcting the notes under requirements not met to read four, five, six, and seven; removal of the landscape examiner's approval of landscaping and number six, Department of Environmental Quality's approval; and addition of Planning Commission's approval of a waiver.

• PLN FRP 26-7 (Coventry Belmont Farm, Belmont Center, lots 1 through 11) was postponed. 31:56 Conditions include removal of landscape examiner's approval number 3 from sign-off and number 8, open space planner, and addition of Planning Commission's approval of the waiver.

• PLN MJDP 2622 (Bryan property) was postponed with no conditions noted. 1:53:14

Approved Items:

• PLN FRP 26-8 (Thomason and Asbury property) was approved. 38:20 Conditions include removal of landscape examiner number 3, number 7 bike and pedestrian planner, and number 8 open space planner's approval.

• PLN MJDP 2613 (Newtown Springs, lot 4A, Jaggers amended) was approved with no conditions noted. 1:02:42

• PLN MJDP 2614 (Ellsford Addition, block 5, lots 1 through 3, Woodland Village amended) was approved. 1:12:40 Conditions include removal of Department of Environmental Quality approval of environmentally sensitive areas.

• PLN MJDP 2617 (Great House property to the Village of Great Acres, lot 9) was approved with no conditions noted. 1:23:24

• PLN MJDP 2619 (The Maxwell and Hersta Division amended) was approved with no conditions noted. 1:47:13

• PLN MJDP 2623 (Beaumont Forest, unit 2, lots 2 and 3) was approved. 2:02:19 Conditions include removal of Division of Water Quality Capacity Assurance Program approval and United States Postal Service Office approval of kiosk locations or easements.

Contested Items

• Sidewalk Waiver for The Maxwell and Hersta Division [timestamp: N/A]

A heated discussion arose during the meeting regarding a waiver request to eliminate the sidewalk along the north side of Hagerman Court, connected to The Maxwell and Hersta division. The disagreement centered on concerns about pedestrian safety and questions over maintenance responsibilities should the waiver be granted. Committee members debated whether removing the sidewalk requirement was appropriate given the potential impact on safe pedestrian access in the area. No outcome or resolution details were recorded in the available meeting data.

PLN FRP 25 35 NDC property unit 3 lot 3

2:30

The Committee took up discussion of PLN FRP 25 35, a final record plat application for NDC Property, Unit 3, Lot 3. Key speakers during this item included Chris, Tracy, and James Chambliss.

The discussion centered on the final record plat for the subject property, with participants addressing requirements that had not yet been met as well as design considerations related to the plat. Specific concerns were raised regarding outstanding requirements, though the record does not detail the precise nature of each deficiency or the specific design elements under review.

The item was ultimately tabled, indicating that the outstanding requirements and design considerations were not resolved to the Committee's satisfaction during the meeting and that further action or additional information would be needed before the plat could move forward.

PLN FRP 26 7 Coventry Belmont Farm Belmont Center lots 1 through 11

19:18

The committee took up a discussion item concerning PLN FRP 26 7, a proposal involving the subdivision of one parcel into 11 lots and public right-of-way in the Belmont Farm/Belmont Center area of Coventry.

Presenter: Matt Carter led the presentation and discussion on this item.

Key Issues: - The proposal centers on dividing a single parcel into 11 individual lots along with the dedication of public right-of-way. - The discussion addressed requirements that had not yet been met by the applicant, as well as design considerations related to the proposed subdivision layout.

Outcome: The item was tabled. The committee did not advance the proposal at this meeting, likely pending resolution of the outstanding requirements and design issues identified during discussion.

*Note: Additional detail on the specific unmet requirements, design concerns, and any public comment is not available in the source data for this item.*

PLN FRP 26 8 Thomason and Asbury property

32:43

The committee took up PLN FRP 26 8, concerning the Thomason and Asbury property, as a discussion item focused on a proposed subdivision of property located in the PDR zone.

Key Speaker: Gary Rowland presented on this item.

• The discussion centered on the proposed subdivision of the Thomason and Asbury property within the PDR (Planned Development Residential or similar) zoning designation.
• Rowland addressed requirements that had not yet been met in connection with the subdivision proposal, as well as design considerations relevant to the application.
• The committee examined the specifics of what outstanding requirements remained and how design elements of the subdivision would need to be addressed going forward.

Outcome: The item was approved by the committee.

*Note: The structured data available for this item is limited. Readers seeking full details on the specific requirements discussed, the nature of the design considerations raised, and any conditions attached to the approval are encouraged to consult the meeting transcript directly beginning at timestamp 32:43.*

PLN MJDP 2613 Newtown Springs Lot 4A, Jaggers amended

50:58

The Committee took up discussion of development plan application PLN MJDP 2613, concerning Newtown Springs Lot 4A, submitted by Jaggers (amended). Brandon Goldberg was the key speaker on this item.

The discussion covered the development plan for the Newtown Springs Lot 4A property, including requirements that had not yet been met as well as design considerations relevant to the application. The amended nature of the submission indicates that the plan had been revised prior to coming before the Committee, likely in response to earlier feedback or outstanding requirements.

Following discussion, the Committee approved the application.

> Note: The available source data for this item is limited. A more detailed summary — including the specific requirements discussed, the nature of any design concerns raised, and the full substance of the debate — would require additional transcript or staff report materials.

PLN MJDP 2614 Ellsford addition block 5, lots 1 through 3, Woodland Village amen

1:03:13

The committee took up discussion of PLN MJDP 2614, an amended development plan for Ellsford Addition Block 5, Lots 1 through 3, Woodland Village. The item was presented as a discussion regarding the development plan for the specified lots within Block 5 of the Ellsford Addition.

Tony Barrett was the key speaker on this agenda item. The discussion centered on requirements that had not yet been met as part of the development plan, as well as design considerations relevant to the proposed project.

The committee reviewed the outstanding requirements and design elements associated with the amended plan before moving to a decision. Despite the noted requirements not being met at the time of discussion, the committee ultimately approved the item.

*Note: The available structured data for this item is limited. Additional details regarding the specific requirements discussed, the nature of the design considerations raised, and any conditions attached to the approval are not reflected in the source materials provided.*

PLN MJDP 2617 Great House property to the Village of Great Acres, lot 9

1:13:13

The committee took up discussion of PLN MJDP 2617, concerning the development plan for the Great House property proposed for the Village of Great Acres, lot 9.

Key Speaker: Chris Howard

Discussion:

• Chris Howard led the presentation and discussion on this item, which centered on the development plan for the Great House property.
• The discussion addressed requirements that had not been met as part of the development plan review, as well as design considerations relevant to the proposal.

Outcome:

• The committee approved the item.

*Note: The available record for this agenda item is limited. Specific details regarding the unmet requirements, the nature of the design considerations debated, and any conditions attached to the approval are not reflected in the provided data.*

PLN MJDP 2619 The Maxwell and Hersta division amended

1:53:44

The committee took up discussion of PLN MJDP 2619, concerning an amended development plan for The Maxwell and Hersta division.

• Key speaker: Matt Carter led the presentation and discussion of this item.
• Discussion focus: The item centered on the development plan for The Maxwell and Hersta division, with discussion addressing requirements that had not yet been met as well as design considerations related to the proposal.
• Outcome: The committee approved the amended development plan.

*Note: The available source material for this item is limited. Additional details regarding the specific requirements discussed, design considerations raised, or any conditions attached to the approval are not available in the provided data.*

PLN MJDP 2622 Bryan property

1:48:13

The committee took up a discussion of PLN MJDP 2622, concerning the development plan for the Bryan property. Matt Carter was the key speaker on this item.

The discussion centered on requirements that had not yet been met under the development plan, as well as design considerations associated with the proposal. Specific details regarding the outstanding requirements and the nature of the design issues were addressed during the presentation.

The item was ultimately tabled by the committee, indicating that the matter was not resolved at this meeting and will require further review or additional information before a final determination can be made.

---

*Note: The source data available for this item is limited. For full details on the specific requirements discussed, design concerns raised, and any committee deliberation, viewers are encouraged to consult the meeting video beginning at timestamp 1:48:13.*

PLN MJDP 2623 Beaumont Forest Unit 2, Lots 2 and 3

1:53:44

The committee took up discussion of the development plan application PLN MJDP 2623, concerning Beaumont Forest Unit 2, Lots 2 and 3.

Key Speaker: Matt Carter

The item was brought forward as a discussion matter, with the presentation addressing the development plan for the subject lots within Beaumont Forest Unit 2. The discussion covered requirements that had not yet been met as well as design considerations relevant to the proposed development.

The outcome of the item was approved by the committee.

*Note: The available structured data for this item is limited. For full details on the specific requirements discussed, design considerations raised, and any conditions attached to the approval, viewers are encouraged to consult the meeting video beginning at timestamp 1:53:44 or the official meeting minutes.*